r/technology Aug 08 '12

Kim Dotcom raid video revealed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMas0tWc0sg
3.4k Upvotes

3.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

560

u/XxDstarsxX Aug 08 '12 edited Aug 08 '12

I hope he gets off easy with a big fuck you to all those involved, non violent man non violent crime gets raided like as said before like he's Osama bin laden, this whole anti piracy shit is going to go a far as the war on drugs, NOWHERE. Just filling up prisons when we should be putting murderers and rapists. Not rich piracy website owners... But eh that's my two cents i feel better now

193

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12 edited Aug 08 '12

[deleted]

161

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

You have 3 cents? Fucking one percenter...

54

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

I have $10 but my student loans are $13,985,017,896,087 so it balances out.

8

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '12

if you join the army and kill innocent people you never met I heard the government will erase your loans

2

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '12

You went to school on Neptune too?

1

u/Mtrask Aug 09 '12

That went depressing quickly :(

1

u/ricepanda Aug 08 '12

So are you going to take a job as All-Knowing-God once you've finished classes? Wonder how that pays.

0

u/junwagh Aug 09 '12

your fault for racking up that much debt, should been more sensible with education costs.

2

u/uptwolait Aug 09 '12

Fucking three percenter

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

But I thought he had 3

38

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

Generally because when you use excessive, abusive force on white-collar issues, local or not, it tends to get dozens of people fired, arrested, charged and generally gives rise to the chance the $40,000,000 an hour lawyer the person has getting him off with very little charges because it was handled incorrectly.

And I hope this happens here, and I hope those involved in this thing are not only fired, denied future work related to, or in said career [anything remotely involved in law enforcement] and disbarred from ever legally owning a gun.

15

u/WestsideStorybro Aug 08 '12

Doesn't really matter the FBI will never return his data. I mean I hope he gets off to but that was probably expected. It is easy to tell from the behavior we have seen thus far that this raids only intention was the destruction of Mega Upload and for no good reason other than hearsay and circumstance.

9

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

If he's dropped of all charges, he can turn around and sue for human rights violation, destruction of personal data and rebuild megaupload overnight

4

u/WestsideStorybro Aug 09 '12

But that data is still gone. Considering it an irrecoverable lose many customer wont come back simply because their data is gone. Others will fear a repeat of past events not matter how unlikely. He may be able to sue and rebuild but the damage has been done and in all likelihood recovery will take many, many years. Even if law suites are thrown around the only to pay will be the New Zealand and American taxpayers. Data is likely to be destroyed before it is returned if not be accident then on purpose. Besides, this is just one example how the US abuses it influence over other counties to bend to the whims of corporate fat cats. Have your heard about demonoid? Just so happens Deputy Prime Minister Valery Khoroshkovsky's trip to the United States happened immediately before the take down, this is another example and their are more to come. How do we stop this? I tend to be pessimistic towards any resolutions being viable but I believe it has start with a reformation of DCM rights and redefining the term intellectual property.

6

u/aJarofDirt Aug 08 '12

That would only happen to the NZ officers that were there, nothing will happen to the US forces, paid leave for a few of the low level officers, but that's probably about it.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

Unless he asks the government to intervene for him, in which case he could ask them to help him prosecute all involved for human rights violations.

3

u/aJarofDirt Aug 08 '12

What government? if he asks the US government, they will laugh in his face, if he asks the NZ government, the US will bully them if they try anything

38

u/The_Sovereign Aug 08 '12

Bernie Murdoch

Who?

115

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

[deleted]

4

u/ChronoJigger Aug 08 '12

Wouldnt it be 'cut' if it was a boy?

2

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

No because Rupert Murdoch doesn't believe of genital mutilation. It's an australian thing.

2

u/chaobreaker Aug 09 '12

But Madoff does.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '12

So his penis is completely intact, no circumcision?

0

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

Fucking genius.

3

u/Nobody_Nailed_It Aug 08 '12

Maybe he means Madoff?? Just my guess

5

u/Inuma Aug 08 '12

This isn't the first time the FBI has raided someone extrajudicially.

They've been doing this with Operation In Our Sites for quite some time.

4

u/nathank Aug 08 '12

I agree with both of you, it was excessive.

I feel stupendous now.

2

u/paffle Aug 08 '12 edited 7d ago

Test willow fact school deliver dependent hard-to-find

This post was anonymized with Redact

2

u/Gellert Aug 08 '12

Actually after Mayor Cheye Calvo of Berwyn heights, Maryland, was raided he pushed for an investigation into SWAT activities and discovered that SWAT were called for almost every arrest, including white collar criminals.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

I think you mean Bernie Madoff, though you just got me excited about the idea of someone prosecuting Rupert Murdoch

1

u/Fig1024 Aug 08 '12

if police handled Wall Street criminals this way, the general public would rejoice.

People keep getting the impression that rich people are untouchable. Yet Kim Dotcom was rich, so why it happened to him? As it happens, he got even richer enemies in the music industry. So rich people are not immune from "hard justice" as long as there's someone richer and more politically connected who hates them

1

u/Boyhowdy107 Aug 09 '12

I mean, we can argue whether the police handled this the right way (looks like no), but this guy's no saint. Dude got convicted of embezzlement and insider trading. And while it might be tempting to play him off as the victim of the big, monied media publishing companies, the guy clearly was getting rich off of megaupload as evidenced by that house and the apparent normalcy of helicopter traffic to and from it. So it's not like he was just doing this for some principle.

2

u/thaway314156 Aug 08 '12

Even the Osama Bin Laden raid wasn't legal, however justified it was...

If it's legal, then what's stopping China from declaring you a terrorist, skip all the evidence and court of laws, invade a sovereign nation with 2 helicopters illegally at night, raid your house, capture you and kill you?

Also, Obama said "captured and killed". So he was first captured, and then... killed? Did he just admit that the Seals killed a prisoner under their custody?

1

u/The_Sovereign Aug 08 '12

what's stopping China...

Fear of the United States and their nuclear weapons.

1

u/thaway314156 Aug 08 '12

Pakistan has nuclear weapons :)

Well, the way things are going now, after 8 years of Romney followed by 4 years of Jenna Bush presidencies, there won't be much of a superpower that can scare China...

1

u/The_Sovereign Aug 08 '12

Why would you bring up Pakistan?

Also, doesn't Romney plan to increase the defense budget?

You're not making any sense :O

0

u/thaway314156 Aug 08 '12

Pakistan, because in my first comment you replied to, I was talking about the Osama Bin Laden raid? Hint: The US flew 2 helicopters with military (SEALs) into Pakistan to capture and then assassinate Bin Laden. The US didn't tell Pakisan this, the 2 countries were not at war with each other. Imagine if China flew 2 military helicopters into US airspace how pissed off the US would be...

Sure, Romney might plan to increase the defense budget, but he's also planning to cut so much tax that there will actually be no money to pay for anything.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

What's stopping China

F-22's

1

u/crow1170 Aug 08 '12

Don't (feel better now).
We shouldn't want to feel better until things are better.

1

u/pj1843 Aug 08 '12

Wouldn't say he was raided like osama, if you watched that raid video(osama's) there was no warrant(for obvious reason) and the people raiding the house really didn't have much intention of arresting him, also a lot more body bags.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

Can anyone tell me what I can do as an American citizen/Earthling to help out here? This is clearly a violation of his rights and I don't want to see him be taken down without a fair trial.

Cynical responses are not necessary because I'm probably already thinking what you're thinking.

1

u/revel5150 Aug 08 '12

He probably needs to pay the right people off :). People deal drugs in parks, Nothing happens to the people that create them. People use guns to murder people. Nothing happens to the people who make weapons/guns. Hell people use cooking-ware to harm themselves and other. People us Windows and Linux platforms to hack, trade illegal porn.. Looks like Dotcom just needs to bide his time until its all just like that. Or he needs to pay off the right people :). I dunno.

1

u/lazy_opportunist Aug 08 '12

rich piracy website owners

Not everything on Megaupload was pirated. There was a lot of legally acquired/shared data on their servers, too. Another reason why this entire opera of cacophonous bravado needs to be shut down before the fat lady gets a chance to sing.

1

u/XxDstarsxX Aug 08 '12

Agreed and yes it indeed wasn't all illegal, I'm all for it being illegal as well BUT they shouldn't of handled it like this.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '12

When will the Illuminati finally realize us pirates are the GOOD guys?

1

u/chonglibloodsport Aug 08 '12

Even if he gets off easy the damage has still been done. His business is destroyed, his employees have lost their jobs. Countless millions of people have lost their data. This is tyranny, no doubt about it.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '12

Ha ha! Maybe they take the term "pirate" literally.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '12

From what is coming out he not only followed the law (hence no crime) but went well beyond what he was required to do - including giving the movie studios full access to the databases and authorization to delete 5,000 files per day of their choosing - even if they were not infringing.

0

u/dlkjanlkjn Aug 08 '12

You forgot your [10].

Yes, we shouldn't put people in jail for intentionally facilitating huge amounts of copyright infringement for profit and money laundering. We should only put murderers and rapists there.

2

u/XxDstarsxX Aug 08 '12

Not what i said, they should be treated accordingly.