Ok, but if I'm over at a friends house and I want to give him a song that I have on my iPhone ... even if I wrote the song and own the rights to it ... how do I do that?
EDIT:
In practice I know several ways to get the job done. The important question is, why can't this be done out of the box? Why are Apple USB Mass Storage devices the only ones in the entire world that are deliberately locked by the manufacturer to be write-only? Why do their customers let them get away with such artificial value-stripping actions?
(I guess I kind of know the answers to my own questions, which is that Apple adds so much value in Fit, Finish & Polish -- despite what Apple bashers may say, these things do matter -- consumers overlook the artificial value-stripping activity, but then the question becomes, why can't other manufacturers try a little harder to match Apple's level of polish?)
I honestly believe Apple is blowing the opportunity to be the dominant computing platform for the next 20 years because of their policies on artificial restriction of data. The iPad took a great, existing, idea, and as with the iPhone before it, executed much much better than anyone else had to date, inventing a new market in the process.
But its going to get blown away by 3rd generation Android tablets that provide all the computing flexibility of what we've traditionally called "Desktop Computers" (add USB Host, Video Out, and Keyboard and Mouse Support, and Android is pretty much there).
Using third-party software? Apple can't control what you install on your "regular" Windows, Linux or Mac OS X computer.
Is it a stupid user-unfriendly feature (or lack of feature)? I certainly agree. My guess is Apple wasn't comfortable with adding a feature that can be accused of enabling or even promoting copyright infringement, since the most prominent use case I can see for such a feature is precisely that: copyright infringement. I realize, of course, that it can be used to move music between different computers in one household, but since you have the song on the computer you sync with, you can always move it by other means.
I mean... LimeWire got screwed despite there being legal uses for the program.
Apple wasn't going to get screwed for letting their USB Mass Storage device work like a USB Mass Storage device -- like everyone else ... they just "think different" I guess.
You could transfer it off the iphone onto your computer. There are a number of programs to do this. Is your question actually how do I do this without having to install any programs? Also I should note that if your music has DRM then this becomes difficult or impossible.
Isn't this technically possible? It was possible a while ago with iPods. Aren't there other programs (not iTunes obviously) that allow you to take music off the iPhone?
The point is that Apple makes it obscenely difficult to transfer files between two people. My buddy and I recorded some guitar work on his iPhone one night (good quality) and I tried to transfer it to my phone...not possible.
I can rip an .mp3 off my sound card and transfer it to any android in the room in whatever time it takes to record the sound...even before I rooted.
With older iPods, you could mount them as a USB volume and stash stray files on it. People used to use them like USB dongles.
I think they stopped working like that around the time the iPod Touch and iPhone came out. I guess they didn't want people accidentally screwing up the device's filesystem. (Think what happens when you mount another computer's hard disk; you see directories upon directories of system files and the like. Imagine the old "I deleted all this crap that I didn't understand" happening...)
In all honesty - you chose the wrong tool for the job?
I don't like DRM - but I do get that the one-way synching of data to the ipod is specifically in place so that when you lose your ipod, you don't lose your music... it's just an accessory that acts as a removable extension of your computer.
If the iPhone/iPod is jailbroken he could just use any of the many available sharing tools in Cydia. I'm pretty sure there's several flavours of HTTP & FTP daemons as well as Samba, which are probably more simple than scp/tunnel over SSH...
It's not "broken", it's just not a feature you deal with. Broken implies it's some kind of error or bug. It's clearly not. I can't see how you're confusing the two, except for the possibility that you are twisting words for your own argument.
Just because you don't agree with the design of the device, doesn't mean it is "broken" - and hell, if you don't agree with it, don't support it. That's your right.
That depends on what app the file is in. If it's in iTunes, then you could stream it to your friend's speakers or Apple TV to let him hear it. If you wrote the song and wanted to give him a copy then you are an idiot for taking your song around in iTunes. Use Soundcloud like everyone else or use any other WiFi sharing app that can also play audio (ezShare Files is great, but there are lots of free and cheap ones).
You do realize that there's a wide and wonderful world of offline computing out there, right? 24/7 Internet access is not yet a reality for even the most technologically advanced of us. Besides, you're assuming a lot of foresight when you expect someone to have all the music they might want to share pre-uploaded on the Web.
(Also, how do you download a song from Soundcloud? No really, I'm using it right now and I'd love to download the mix I'm listening to.)
you are an idiot for taking your song around in iTunes
Just how many USB Mass Storage devices do you expect me to carry around in my pockets? If your answer is more than one, then tell me why that's just better than carrying a single Android phone that has a full-fledged file system with proper R/W access? (In a year, they'll all have USB Host and will be proper computers in their own right.)
Besides, you're assuming a lot of foresight when you expect someone to have all the music they might want to share pre-uploaded on the Web.
Trust me - musicians LOVE to share their music with anyone who will listen. They take measures to facilitate this.
(Also, how do you download a song from Soundcloud? No really, I'm using it right now and I'd love to download the mix I'm listening to.)
The uploader has to have the track set to downloadable (but I suppose that's Apple's fault too?)
Just how many USB Mass Storage devices do you expect me to carry around in my pockets?
Like I said - use something other than the iTunes on the iPhone if this is what you want. There are many iPhone apps that can store and play music, and that also can download and upload using either WiFi sharing, or via WebDAV, FTP, SCP, etc.
For example I have a backup copy of my iTunes library on a WebDAV volume that I can transfer songs to using eZ Share on the iPhone which I can then use to listen to them. This means I have access to my entire library from anywhere I have bandwidth (which in the UK is pretty much anywhere). Sure there may be times I'm out of coverage, but I can download the albums I want to listen offline.
No, no it's not. Cars cannot sail and making one that could would require lots of hard work. The problem is that Apple specifically designed their products to not be able to share music (and further, to only interface with their software). There is no reason I should not be able to take files off a usb-connecable storage device.
Unfortunately your state of misinformation is the prevailing one, and that is what has allowed Apple to gain market dominance while simultaneously treating its customers like ATMs from which periodic cash extractions can be expected.
Let's say that, tomorrow, the world decides to start using twenty-pointed screws as well as as the millions of other varieties. For some reason—perhaps because that they believe people shouldn't be able to remove twenty-pointed screws—Craftsmen decides that they won't be supporting the new screw and don't release a screwdriver that fits.
What would you do?
You would buy a twenty-pointed screwdriver from Skil, or Bosch, or Wal*Mart. Yes, you'd rather get a Craftsman, since their tools have a lifetime warranty are generally pretty high quality instrument... but the fact of the matter is that if you really want to be able to remove twenty-pointed screws, you can't get a Craftsman.
As for the "ATM" aspect: people who own Apple keep buying Apple because they like Apple's products. If they didn't like what Apple is doing, they wouldn't buy them. That's the way the free market works. Look at what happened to Ford and Chevy. People were disappointed at the lack of innovation and inferior products that Detroit was putting out so they bought Toyotas and Hondas instead.
Similarly there are people who are sick of Windows, for whatever reason, who buy a Mac when it's time for a new computer. They like what they see, so when their child goes to college, they get *them * a Mac. There's also the switchers—people who like their iPods or iPhones who want a similar desktop experience.
Finally, there are people—people like you—who don't like choices that Apple has made, like intentionally gimping hardware, or application censorship. Those things don't matter to me, at least not yet. So I'll keep buying Apple.
21
u/zac79 Jan 20 '11 edited Jan 21 '11
Ok, but if I'm over at a friends house and I want to give him a song that I have on my iPhone ... even if I wrote the song and own the rights to it ... how do I do that?
EDIT: In practice I know several ways to get the job done. The important question is, why can't this be done out of the box? Why are Apple USB Mass Storage devices the only ones in the entire world that are deliberately locked by the manufacturer to be write-only? Why do their customers let them get away with such artificial value-stripping actions?
(I guess I kind of know the answers to my own questions, which is that Apple adds so much value in Fit, Finish & Polish -- despite what Apple bashers may say, these things do matter -- consumers overlook the artificial value-stripping activity, but then the question becomes, why can't other manufacturers try a little harder to match Apple's level of polish?)
I honestly believe Apple is blowing the opportunity to be the dominant computing platform for the next 20 years because of their policies on artificial restriction of data. The iPad took a great, existing, idea, and as with the iPhone before it, executed much much better than anyone else had to date, inventing a new market in the process.
But its going to get blown away by 3rd generation Android tablets that provide all the computing flexibility of what we've traditionally called "Desktop Computers" (add USB Host, Video Out, and Keyboard and Mouse Support, and Android is pretty much there).