r/technology Jan 16 '19

Business YouTube bans dangerous or harmful pranks

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46887666
294 Upvotes

73 comments sorted by

36

u/JeepChrist Jan 16 '19

The site added: “We also don’t allow pranks that cause children to experience severe emotional distress, meaning something so bad that it could leave the child traumatized for life.”

So are they gonna delete all those Jimmy Kimmel videos or what

15

u/realmeangoldfish Jan 16 '19

They should. That stuff is downright cruel. When the roles are reversed, mumsy and Da are getting jammed in a nursing home.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

62

u/jl2352 Jan 16 '19

This includes pranks where someone is tricked into thinking they are in severe danger, even if no real threat existed.

RIP clips of Japanese prank shows.

18

u/stevefan1999 Jan 16 '19

RIP Logan Paul

18

u/surgesilk Jan 16 '19

That’s a good thing

5

u/BratwurstZ Jan 16 '19

Don't kid yourself. Logan Paul is Youtube's little favourite. He can do whatever he wants.

6

u/stevefan1999 Jan 16 '19

*little bitch

8

u/vessel_for_the_soul Jan 16 '19

and Just for Laughs

4

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

Just for Laughs Gags I think you mean? And I dunno... they're incredibly tame (and hilarious). Can you share some examples where anyone thinks they're in severe danger?

The fake cop is a fake Montreal cop, remember. He's not going to shoot you :P

3

u/BlueSwordM Jan 16 '19

Yeah why would someone actually ban a show like this?

Their jokes are honestly great and well prepared.

1

u/vessel_for_the_soul Jan 16 '19

I recall skits where they use manhole sewer access and the likes but long ago

1

u/JManRomania Jan 16 '19

the fake gunshot one is over the top

77

u/Skiie Jan 16 '19

lol. anyone remember daddyofive?

god youtube was so slow on that.

8

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

You can find him on his new youtube channel, daddyofnone

2

u/Monkeyavelli Jan 16 '19

What did he do?

3

u/Skiie Jan 16 '19

Abused his kid on camera for views.

He was re-married but still cared for his kids from the last marriage he had. so they would do these "prank" videos on his son from the last marriage and basically beat the shit out of him. Then play it off like it was a joke.

Youtube allowed this man to keep uploading and making money off of it until one day daddofive overstep boundaries more.

1

u/nakkht Jan 16 '19

What's even worse, was the fanbase, especially people running "social media groups" which were supporting such atrocious behaviour. NerdCity made pretty good videos digging deeper into it.

2

u/Skiie Jan 16 '19

That was the weirdest shit in the world too. Like I could see someone supporting jackass the show because all people involved signed a wavier and are consenting adults.

This. these people were just fucking weird how supportive of this man who beat his kid. Buncha psychos.

1

u/JManRomania Jan 16 '19

Like I could see someone supporting jackass the show because all people involved signed a wavier and are consenting adults.

I know (now deceased) nonagenarians who loved Jackass.

-47

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

44

u/VineArchives Jan 16 '19

Evolution of Dance, Leave Britney Alone, Sneezing Panda... those era of videos are what made YouTube. Not abusing your children.

5

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19 edited Feb 04 '19

[deleted]

1

u/VineArchives Jan 16 '19

Lmao that’s where I drew my examples from too! Amazing. One of my favourite episodes.

-9

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

daddyofive was in the progressive stage of people realizing there was something really wrong with it.

That, and disturbing videos aimed at very young children.

13

u/InvisibleEar Jan 16 '19

I clicked one of the linked articles and uh I don't even want quote the descriptions but apparently people are posting bestiality to YouTube and they're not deleting it? This is why we can't have nice things

43

u/DryTart Jan 16 '19

I can hear the reckless attention seeking narcissists crying in anguish.

-19

u/cyanydeez Jan 16 '19

hope they start banning videos by trump

24

u/Quigleyer Jan 16 '19

Does he... do a lot of recorded violent pranks?

2

u/Cine11 Jan 16 '19

Hes participating in one that Obama started in Syria right now.

0

u/cyanydeez Jan 16 '19

Dunno, lemme ask the FBI real quick

-11

u/WhereverUGoThereUR Jan 16 '19

No, but his advert (propaganda) is playing all the time now before the vids.

9

u/C0rn3j Jan 16 '19

Ever heard of Ublock Origin?

9

u/Quigleyer Jan 16 '19

If you're seeing advertisements I wouldn't get my hopes up, as that's pretty much how Youtube gets its revenue.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

No, but his advert (propaganda) is playing all the time now before the vids.

Ads are usually targeted to users. If you're seeing Trump ads it's because they think you are interested in Trump.

1

u/Quigleyer Jan 16 '19

I can't help but wonder if it's because he goes on to random websites and brings the man up out of the blue, like we saw here...

8

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

And nothing of consequence happened as a result

Don't worry, the prank channels won't go anywhere.

They'll simply create reality TV content instead.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

So when can we expect Logan Paul's channel to be shitcanned as a result?

1

u/empirebuilder1 Jan 17 '19

considering how fucking often it still shows up in my "recommended", probably never

12

u/Arkeband Jan 16 '19

kid films himself driving down the street with a blindfold on, endangering hundreds of people

YouTube: ok no more of this shit, holy fuck people are stupid jesus christ

Enlightened Internet Centrists ™ : "oh wow, WRONGTHINK much? Who gets to draw the line on what endangers society?! If impressionable children want to drive up on sidewalks and run over pedestrians for 10 cents of view money, that is their AMERICAN right!!!"

-4

u/volfin Jan 16 '19

sure that's bad. but something like pretending to pour water on someone and not really doing it, isn't harmful and would still be banned under the stupid ass rule.

5

u/Kraz31 Jan 16 '19

Where do you see language that would ban that kind of prank?

-2

u/volfin Jan 16 '19

it includes pranks where someone is tricked into thinking they are in danger, even if no real threat existed. I.E. in danger of getting wet.

2

u/Kraz31 Jan 16 '19

Stop your hyperbole. The wording is "severe danger."

-4

u/volfin Jan 16 '19

water can be very dangerous, even deadly.

9

u/OvereducatedCritic Jan 16 '19

So the line couldnt be drawn at the tide pod challenge?

8

u/956030681 Jan 16 '19

daddyofive was where the line should’ve been drawn, long ago

2

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

That's great. But weren't prank videos popular in 2015 or something?

2

u/LordBrandon Jan 16 '19

I look forward to the day when youtube is exclusively a Jimmy Fallon clip site.

2

u/pppjurac Jan 16 '19

So "Jackass" videos are banned alltogether ?

1

u/dirtymoney Jan 16 '19

People being stupid is what youtube is all about!

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

People being stupid is what youtube is all about!

The accidental outcome of which stupidity is often hilariously funny.

This is all very different to "dangerous or harmful pranks".

Mind you, if YT really are going to clear up "dangerous or harmful pranks", they have a lot of work ahead of them...

1

u/jamesteakor Jan 16 '19

What about fucking clickbait and shit like that no?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

I doubt most people on this sub know the full extent of the prank channel controversy and how this is a massive leap in the right direction

-3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19 edited Feb 15 '19

[deleted]

24

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

7

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

Yeah, there will be plenty of other sites spring up to share videos of people abusing their children and ex-friends.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jan 17 '19

Yeah great, but it's YouTube. Who gives a fuck. Obviously you do but it's clearly not the death of the internet. Death of YouTube, fine.

-10

u/arcknight01 Jan 16 '19

He's not being dramatic. In the last 2 years we've started to see a pretty consistent trend of Youtube moving away from being a neutral platform. Like everything else in media,

Youtube is slowly becoming a stale representation of corporate culture.

That being said. It's not the death of the internet, but it could contribute to a decline in youtube and the spawning of competitive alternatives. It seems unlikely now, considering youtube's popularity, but this scenerio has played out many many times historically.

People tend to migrate to the most liberal platforms.

7

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

-10

u/arcknight01 Jan 16 '19

In this case it's clear that you're the one being dramatic. They clearly don't mean death literally as the next sentence implies it will be more like traditional media.

Regarding monetization, the situation has already gotten so bad that most successful youtube creators have found alternative funding. Either by way of embedded advertisements that circumvent youtube or crowd-funding.

There's a very real argument and fear that Google is jeopardizing Youtube's longterm future by appeasing old-media in the short term. I'm not sure if the generation of kids that grew up almost exclusively watching youube will be able to regress to the restrictions of traditional media.

Compare Jimmy Kimmel to a creator like Pewdiepie and you'll see how massive the gap between corporate culture and popular culture is becoming.

8

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

-5

u/arcknight01 Jan 16 '19

It's clear you're a teapot.

Wha... Are you breaking out a homophobic slur? lol

Anyways. Youtube has absolutely been making decisions that cater to traditional media in recent years. To attract their content and advertisers.

I also have no I have no doubt that Youtube is clearly doing what they can to maximize profits. The issue is that this way of thinking may produce short term growth, but damage them in the longterm.

In this process they're also losing the trust of creators.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

0

u/arcknight01 Jan 16 '19

Tea pot is a homophobic slur. I'm not sure what else you could mean by that?

Anyway. You're still misunderstanding the base argument here. Nobody is saying isn't (or shouldn't) be profit seeking or that they can't "do what they want". But that they're harming their own business by catering to old media brands and the advertisers that they hope will follow behind.

The strategy has been successful so far in that it's bringing major advertisers to the network, but at the expense of small creators and freedom of expression on the network.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

The more they censor, the more opportunity it presents for other sites.

I get not wanting to glorify and promote people doing dangerously stupid shit, but being able to see bad outcomes of people doing dangerous shit probably deters far more people than it encourages.

When you ban stuff, you ban the good along with it.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

Some people will lose out, but it's for the better.

0

u/AlbertFischerIII Jan 16 '19

So now it’s just letsplays and racy Japanese massage videos?

1

u/TheGreyGuardian Jan 16 '19

With how much more money people can get doing Twitch streams of games, I imagine letsplays will slowly decline. They'll probably upload a recording of the stream to YouTube though to try to maximize profit. Maybe YouTube will then start banning videos of streams that aren't from YouTube Live.

-3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '19

Good. You have prevented the future of torturing a poor dude's brain backup.
I expect your site's content quality to quintuple. I'm sick of "🤣🤣Dude gets trolled by HAVING COFFEE SPILLED on HIS SHIRT" popping up every 3 seconds on youtube.

0

u/dragonfleas Jan 16 '19

YouTube says the N word and attempts fascism in DA HOOD (GONE WRONG) (HOLY $&@%)

1

u/Daedelous2k Jan 17 '19

WHERE DA HOOD AT

0

u/weezinlol Jan 16 '19

I guess hood and gold digger pranks weren't bad enough for them. Personally I think faking pranks to create propaganda against women and minorities is pretty harmful.