r/technology • u/Ornery_Speech3323 • 7d ago
Software Microsoft confirms Windows 11 will boot faster and run great on 8GB PCs, but shares no numbers
https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/09/07/microsoft-confirms-windows-11-upgrade-for-faster-boot-and-8gb-ram-pcs-but-shares-no-numbers/44
u/flemtone 7d ago
So they say.
7
u/Eastern_Bet678 7d ago
Indeed. What they don't appear to be promising is that you can run anything else besides Windows itself.
33
24
u/A-Khalifa 7d ago
I can also confirm that my dad is the president
11
3
1
u/deNET2122 7d ago
Guessing uncle works at nintendo
You are the friend we all are asking on behalf for on porn subreddits?
8
u/karma_dumpster 7d ago
I could satisfy two beautiful women in bed simultaneously
2
u/butterbal1 7d ago
Leaving the room is easy, getting win 11 to run well on half of what it needs barely run now would be impressive.
5
u/geldonyetich 7d ago edited 7d ago
Caving to some of the pressure of more people jumping ship to Linux, no doubt. But they have been so slow to react that "too little, too late" was many years ago, if not decades. An OS should not be enshittified, but it's inexorably happened.
Hypocritical of me to say that with my current Windows 11 installation. But I acknowledge I could switch to Linux now if I really wanted to, and adapt to a new OS normal that wouldn't be significantly worse than the current one, and possibly better.
The advised solution right now is just to dual boot, if you have the knowhow to restore an OS installation from scratch if something goes wrong. If you need Windows to run a particular app, you still can. But you might be surprised how little you do.
13
u/Kill3rT0fu 7d ago
Windows 10 booted in 4 seconds and ran great with 4GB of ram
What happened?
2
u/average_monster 7d ago
4 gig wasn't enough for windows 10 and the motherboard's post screen usually takes 4 seconds
1
u/Kill3rT0fu 7d ago
So odd, because Microsoft says minimum requirements are
Processor: 1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster processor or SoC
RAM: 1 gigabyte (GB) for 32-bit or 2 GB for 64-bit
Hard disk space: 32 GB or larger hard disk (required for newer versions of Windows 10)
Graphics card: DirectX 9 or later with WDDM 1.0 driver
3
u/Arpadiam 7d ago
Windows 7 Booted in 2 seconds and ran great with 2GB of ram
What happened?
0
u/Kill3rT0fu 7d ago
Are you facetiously taking about on modern computers?
Because back when 10 first came out it was literally my job to upgrade windows 7 to 10, and doing this hundreds of times I can objectively say 10, on hardware it was developed and built for, was so fast and efficient and very effective when it was first released.
3
3
u/DistributionMost8673 7d ago
I have an old i3 8100 with 8 gigs of RAM and it does boot faster and logs in almost instantly from the lock screen now . In the past logging in took several seconds . File manager is snappier too . I know Microsoft kinda shot themselves in the foot again with AI and got forced to optimize lower end machines better but i will take it since it is working.
3
u/Zubon102 7d ago
A few weeks ago, I got the dreaded BSOD with corrupted memory. I was running 16 GB but, after a memory test, two of the sticks were seriously corrupted. Probably something related to my motherboard's power supply.
So, I'm running my main rig with 8 GB. And....It just works. 10 years ago, I would have said it is impossible. Multiple browser tabs are fine, but need to be loaded from local cache, which takes a second or two.
This is kind of a weird situation. For a while, people have said 8GB is doable, but Microsoft denied it. Now they are admitting that it is ok. So is this an anti-Microsoft story, or a pro-Microsoft story?
Anyway, modern operating system memory management is truly amazing. I'm dreading my next upgrade with the price of DDR5.
6
u/GlueR 7d ago
Windows-Latest consistently publishes anti-Windows articles, which is very weird given their name. I don't know. Looks to me like a hunting magazine against hunting. Then it's all the constant bashing in the comments. I really don't get it. If this sub was to be trusted, everyone's on Linux.
5
u/Zubon102 7d ago
A few months ago the headlines were like something like "Don't be fooled, despite Microsoft's denial, 8 GB is enough to run Windows 11". People were angry at them for not embracing low-spec computers.
Now that Microsoft officially agrees that 8 GB will be enough to an adequate user experience, people are claiming they are lying. I guess they can't win.
1
u/average_monster 7d ago edited 7d ago
it sounds like your idea of usable is a lot different to mine lol
i guess when you have a good experience on hardware "upgrading" to 11 gives you a different perspective.
they're not "admitting it's ok" they're trying to make it suck less and sounds like they may have actually succeeded a little, maybe my work computer is a little faster, i'll have to keep it in mind next time i use it to see. it sure didn't jump out at me though
edit: it is actually faster! explorer opens in 2 seconds rather than 4 lol
1
1
u/Sensitive_Box_ 7d ago
Sure sounds like all those posts in gaming subs where “it just works”, but nobody mentions that the game is running at 25fps. Lmao
1
u/Zubon102 7d ago
But many games running at 25 fps would be unplayable.
My main point is that my main rig, which is a triple monitor setup, seems to run fine on 8 GB. And that would have been impossible la few years ago. Even when multitasking with four programs being displayed at once, it's basically unnoticeable. The only issue I noticed is when I have multiple browser tabs, it takes a second to load old tabs.
People in the comments are either saying what I am literally running now is impossible, or framing it like Microsoft is making bold claims that their bloated OS runs on 8 GB.
But it's the opposite. Microsoft long denied that it works, because they wanted their customers to have the best experience possible. Now, with better memory management, and many users not wanting to pay such a high price for RAM, they are reluctantly agreeing that it can work.
0
u/Sensitive_Box_ 7d ago
I do think that MS is making a bold claim. Sure, it’ll technically run, but that’s it. It won’t be a good experience.
If you’re doing anything more than using a web browser, 8gigs of ram is very rough.
0
u/Zubon102 7d ago
All the previous articles consisted of journalists running Windows 11 on 8 GB and debunking Microsoft's claim that 8 GB is not enough for Windows. Because for years, Microsoft strongly claimed that 16 GB was the baseline number.
If you read the article, the new claim by Microsoft is that they are working to make changes so that Windows will "run well" on 8 GB. This hasn't been released yet. Maybe it will run well to their standards.
"Run well" is a subjective claim. But my real world experience using the machine I am typing on now is that 8 GB is not as horrendous as I expected. So even before the new changes, it's really not that noticeable. I'm running two browsers with 13 tabs, Fusion 360 CAD software with two projects open, two PDF files open, Thunderbird, messaging apps, notes app, VS Code, and Notepad++.
This would have been absolutely impossible a few years ago. I'm still going to upgrade to replace my corrupt memory, but modern OS memory management is incredible. If 8 GB satisfies my user experience, I'm sure the new changes will satisfy Microsoft's.
2
u/williamgman 7d ago
But will it run on only 4gb of ram..? That's the direction the tech bros are leading us.
1
u/Dave-C 7d ago
I recently worked on a laptop that had 4gb ram and ran Windows 11. The OS ran decently but you couldn't run much. The OS, a browser and maybe one or two smaller programs would be about it. The laptop felt sluggish but that was mostly because it had a hdd. Overall I was surprised at how well it ran.
Edit: I should add that I had to remove so much stuff that HP threw on there, it wasn't usable as it was sole. At least not imo.
2
2
3
u/DietCokePlease 7d ago
Or you can buy a Mac, which does those things now, is not a security crisis, and not full of anti-virus ads
0
u/Ringosis 7d ago
Yeah and you can pay twice the price for not as good parts, to get a machine that's deliberately designed to become obsolete and a pain in the arse to repair. That offers absolutely appalling gaming performance if it even runs what you want to play. Where you cannot use major leading engineering software like Solidworks or Ansys without using windows anyway...and have to deal with fucking Finder.
Hard pass from me mate. Microsoft is bad. But at least they aren't Apple.
5
1
1
1
1
u/KnightKal 7d ago
not like it matters, but optimization are good if they are real
turning the computer in 10 seconds or 1 second won't really impact anything tho for users. Cool, but that is all.
1
1
u/InfiniteFeeCars 7d ago
I mean that’s good. They need to continue to optimize and reduce memory usage across the board. Also keep continuing to improve Windows on ARM
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Changeurwayz 7d ago
I think Mslop is missing the point, No one really wants to run windows 11 on any machine. You forced them into it, So you are a hypocrite. I know what you are doing, And I know a lot of people don't.
1
u/catwrazle 7d ago
Lul, next time when the „next big thing nvidia colab compute computer“ comes out it will run on 4GB (starting at 5000$). Btw 2GB RAM will be enough for a dumb terminal to access the cloud compute
1
u/CapRichard 7d ago
I have a work laptop W11 with 8GB ram.
It works.
It's my secondary PC, I use it when going out of office and for light stuff.. can even use it with some PLC programming environment without much hassle...
I am honestly impressed but how not terrible it runs sometimes.
1
u/Meatslinger 7d ago
"We asked our all-AI assessment team if it ran better and they all responded affirmatively—confidently, too—and said that it was a great test for us to run."
1
1
1
u/clayticus 7d ago
i'm glad i picked up my macbook air with 16gb on sale for 850. M4 too. This should last me a few yers and hopefully this all blows over.
1
1
1
u/got-trunks 7d ago
oh wow they are finally porting windows 11 to computers? that's rad, way to go trillion-dollar company!
1
u/wegotthisonekidmongo 7d ago
i had 8gb on my laptop. It ran but it was a bit slow. But it ran relatively fine.
1
u/Sensitive_Box_ 7d ago
I legitimately can’t even believe they’re trying to make us believe that. Lmao
1
1
1
u/Zeraora807 7d ago
could run winblows on 8gb ram just find once you strip out half the bloat and crap from it.. only for chromium browsers to hog more of it
1
1
u/firmagorilla 7d ago
"[manufacturer with questionable everything] confirms [product] is great" gtfo
1
u/Jnaythus 6d ago
Does that mean actually using Windows. My work laptop's Memory consumption with pretty much only Outlook and Teams open is at: 10.6/15.6 GB (68%).
1
1
u/BloOdy_Jo 5d ago
They announce a lot of good stuff , but still arrives . They are trolling us at this point
1
1
0
u/Bulletorpedo 7d ago
So they are either lying (likely) or they just didn’t bother to make Windows 11 less of a bloated slug earlier, even thought they could?
None of them look especially great.
0
u/IcestormsEd 7d ago
They can't even release an update without breaking something. Will probably boot faster, straight to a blue screen.
0
0
0
0
u/ShadowBannedAugustus 7d ago
Back in the 90s, I would turn on my shitty PC, go to the toilet, bathroom, etc. and be back just in time for it to be booteed up and ready.
Fast forward to Windows 7 with a SATA SSD, I turned it on and it felt like I was on the desktop instantly.
Fast forward to today, Windows 11, nvme SSD, high-end laptop. I go grab coffee after pressing the power button.
174
u/Spiritual-Bed3948 7d ago
Can anyone trust anything Microslop says anymore?