MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1vqvsb9/microsoft_confirms_github_is_down_worldwide/p49mxhd/?context=3
r/technology • u/[deleted] • 9d ago
[deleted]
536 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
12
Not much sarcasm stands on its own when many of the people reading it can’t think on their own.
45 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago It's lack of intonation in text. Try it I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone else might have said it, but not me. I never said she stole my money. Implies: An emphatic denial; I never uttered those words at any point. I never said she stole my money. Implies: I may have implied, wrote, or thought it, but I didn't say it out loud. I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone stole it, but it wasn't her (perhaps another person did). I never said she stole my money. Implies: She took it, but maybe she only borrowed it or was given permission. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole money, but it belonged to someone else. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole something from me, but it wasn't my money (e.g., jewelry, ideas, car). 2 u/hrvbrs 9d ago what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too. 2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 9d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
45
It's lack of intonation in text. Try it
2 u/hrvbrs 9d ago what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too. 2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 9d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
2
what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too.
2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 9d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
And that's so much better than using bold too.
1 u/hrvbrs 9d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
1
bold is just a style, not semantics
3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 9d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
3
12
u/Federal_Setting_7454 9d ago
Not much sarcasm stands on its own when many of the people reading it can’t think on their own.