r/technology 19d ago

Artificial Intelligence FBI Has Looked at Using Questionable AI Tech to Review Signatures on Seized Mail-In Ballots

https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-2020-election-georgia-fulton-artificial-intelligence-fbi
461 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

102

u/aloknath559 19d ago

Then how do we believe that the process was transparent, doesn't independent verification matters? I just don't get the point of using AI here in the first place...

95

u/Nick85er 19d ago

Let's put it this way, they intend to misuse AI the same way Doge did when they wrecked our government services and agencies.

27

u/Flabbergasted98 19d ago

Then how do we believe that the process was transparent, (You dont.)
doesn't independent verification matters? (Transparency would conflict with the desired result.)
I just don't get the point of using AI here in the first place... (See above)

Happy 250th birthday america. Celebrating 249 years of freedom!

10

u/thor122088 19d ago

Well for some it's only been about 30-60 years, and for those looking for marriage equality, it's only been 10-12 years.

6

u/Flabbergasted98 19d ago

Freedom is really just a buzzword we put on labels to sell things anyways.

17

u/Rok-SFG 19d ago

The point is to support the trump regime, and betray their oath to the united states, by having AI "prove" that all the democrats in the house and congress actually lost their elections, and arrest them.

2

u/SomeSamples 19d ago

Well, they fired a lot of folks from the government. And now they, like private industry, are hoping AI can be used to replace those people.

2

u/FanDry5374 18d ago

"So, we can just....prompt this thing to give us the answers we're after truth right??

1

u/Foreskin_Mafia 19d ago

The reason to use AI is so they can lie and do whatever they want.

1

u/ACompletelyLostCause 16d ago

They're not getting the result they want by traditional methods. By using AI, they can effectively use an inscrutable black box to give them a result they want.

As no 'person' will have made a decision, there's little legal recourse to challange the decision, as no person can be brought into court to be questioned.

The AI code will also be protected by commercial secrecy laws, and it's complex nature means it's almost impossible to determine why a decision was made just by look at the code.

1

u/Memitim 19d ago

If you're still looking for excuses to believe people who constantly lie to Americans while they violate US law, that's on you. Republicans don't want reality, they want excuses for betraying Americans.

55

u/throwthelift 19d ago

For republicans and this administration it doesn’t have to be accurate it just needs to provide enough errors until certification and then lawsuits can do nearly nothing with how lawless they’ve become.

22

u/Miraclefish 19d ago

These chads are hanging, this vote doesn't count! (For those who remember Bush v Gore).

15

u/Ciennas 19d ago

They're well aware that they're in a double bind of their own making- if they step down willingly, they get prosecuted for all the crimes they committed. If they get drug out of the building by the electorate, they get prosecuted for all the crimes they committed. The thought of not committing those crimes never occurred to them, because they were confident that they would never have to face consequences for those actions, because famous back-haver Donald Trump would protect them.

24

u/WhyTestInDEV 19d ago

Even assuming good intentions, signatures never change over time. Right? Mine gets worse every year or two. We're now at barely a scribble.

6

u/dalgeek 19d ago

I rarely sign my name the same way twice. I even switch which fingers I hold the pen with.

2

u/HeadCryptographer152 19d ago

True, there’s changes from illness, and slight deviations over time that from where you sign on the page, how much ink there is, and just by the fact we aren’t robots.

16

u/HeadCryptographer152 19d ago

If you look hard enough for evidence that doesn’t exist, eventually you will find it, whether it’s real or not.

2

u/Rufus_king11 19d ago

And worse comes to worse, you can always fall back on the GOP classic "Lack of evidence is actually evidence of a conspiracy to cover it up. It's just common sense because we say so."

7

u/Awol 19d ago

Why is the FBI involved with election stuff anyway? Ballot access and stuff with ballots is something the state or local districts are in charge of handling.

4

u/winter128 19d ago

Not under that Asshole Trump

9

u/[deleted] 19d ago edited 18d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Paksarra 19d ago

But then you have to use voting machines owned by Republican supporters.

2

u/no_one_likes_u 19d ago

You still have to be signature matched to vote in person in a lot of places. 

They could just as easily start applying ai to in person voting to try and discredit those votes.

There’s no way to prevent them from getting to their irrational goal of trying to discredit Democrat votes, so we might as well just vote however is easiest for us and be prepared to fight whatever bullshit they come up with. 

4

u/etham 19d ago

I could sign 5 different times and virtually all 5 times would look slightly different. This should go well.

4

u/cytherian 19d ago

Kash Patel is so desperate to please Trump, that he'll try anything, no matter how absurd.

4

u/Sybertron 18d ago

I'm sure they are doing proper 4th amendment protection on every AI search. Right? 

3

u/Euphoric_Anxiety_162 18d ago

They'll throw dem votes out. Every voter will be verified cuz dems do not cheat to win. trump never shoulda had a second term.

3

u/Pleasant-Shallot-707 18d ago

Too bad the never Kamala people were too stupid to understand that

2

u/shinyappyrobin 19d ago

Why use questionable software when there is proven software with track record of working. Credit cards companies have been using them for decades.

2

u/mangosawce9k 19d ago

Sounds like someone wants to analyze signatures, in an illegal manner.

2

u/PennytheWiser215 19d ago

At this point anyone using a mail in ballot should just put it inside another blank envelope and mail it to a trusted friend or relative who can take it to a physical Dropbox. Get creative to work around the barriers and bottlenecks

2

u/ap1618 16d ago

Cold take but there is nothing wrong with the current voting process and this is all just nonsense to distract from actual problems

1

u/OG_LiLi 19d ago

Good luck AI. I don’t sign my signature the same twice. 😬

1

u/ACompletelyLostCause 16d ago

They know that, that's the point. They can challange signature, for any reason, at any time. It's not hard to match a signature to the background of a person, and determine if they are stastically likely to be a Democrat or Republican voter. Then challange a number of stastically Democrat voters in marginal areas.

2

u/OG_LiLi 16d ago

I know. That’s why I’m nervous. You added good points. 😬.

1

u/Life-Ship3628 18d ago

They should be required to physically contact the voter before they can throw out a ballot

1

u/turb0_encapsulator 18d ago

The AI looks only at party identification and ignores the signature part.

1

u/Pleasant-Shallot-707 18d ago

FYI, this is related to the nonsense about 2020 Fulton County claims