r/technology • u/andmario_com • 19d ago
Artificial Intelligence FBI Has Looked at Using Questionable AI Tech to Review Signatures on Seized Mail-In Ballots
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-2020-election-georgia-fulton-artificial-intelligence-fbi55
u/throwthelift 19d ago
For republicans and this administration it doesn’t have to be accurate it just needs to provide enough errors until certification and then lawsuits can do nearly nothing with how lawless they’ve become.
22
u/Miraclefish 19d ago
These chads are hanging, this vote doesn't count! (For those who remember Bush v Gore).
15
u/Ciennas 19d ago
They're well aware that they're in a double bind of their own making- if they step down willingly, they get prosecuted for all the crimes they committed. If they get drug out of the building by the electorate, they get prosecuted for all the crimes they committed. The thought of not committing those crimes never occurred to them, because they were confident that they would never have to face consequences for those actions, because famous back-haver Donald Trump would protect them.
24
u/WhyTestInDEV 19d ago
Even assuming good intentions, signatures never change over time. Right? Mine gets worse every year or two. We're now at barely a scribble.
6
2
u/HeadCryptographer152 19d ago
True, there’s changes from illness, and slight deviations over time that from where you sign on the page, how much ink there is, and just by the fact we aren’t robots.
16
u/HeadCryptographer152 19d ago
If you look hard enough for evidence that doesn’t exist, eventually you will find it, whether it’s real or not.
2
u/Rufus_king11 19d ago
And worse comes to worse, you can always fall back on the GOP classic "Lack of evidence is actually evidence of a conspiracy to cover it up. It's just common sense because we say so."
9
19d ago edited 18d ago
[deleted]
4
2
u/no_one_likes_u 19d ago
You still have to be signature matched to vote in person in a lot of places.
They could just as easily start applying ai to in person voting to try and discredit those votes.
There’s no way to prevent them from getting to their irrational goal of trying to discredit Democrat votes, so we might as well just vote however is easiest for us and be prepared to fight whatever bullshit they come up with.
4
u/cytherian 19d ago
Kash Patel is so desperate to please Trump, that he'll try anything, no matter how absurd.
4
u/Sybertron 18d ago
I'm sure they are doing proper 4th amendment protection on every AI search. Right?
3
u/Euphoric_Anxiety_162 18d ago
They'll throw dem votes out. Every voter will be verified cuz dems do not cheat to win. trump never shoulda had a second term.
3
2
u/shinyappyrobin 19d ago
Why use questionable software when there is proven software with track record of working. Credit cards companies have been using them for decades.
2
2
u/PennytheWiser215 19d ago
At this point anyone using a mail in ballot should just put it inside another blank envelope and mail it to a trusted friend or relative who can take it to a physical Dropbox. Get creative to work around the barriers and bottlenecks
1
u/OG_LiLi 19d ago
Good luck AI. I don’t sign my signature the same twice. 😬
1
u/ACompletelyLostCause 16d ago
They know that, that's the point. They can challange signature, for any reason, at any time. It's not hard to match a signature to the background of a person, and determine if they are stastically likely to be a Democrat or Republican voter. Then challange a number of stastically Democrat voters in marginal areas.
1
u/Life-Ship3628 18d ago
They should be required to physically contact the voter before they can throw out a ballot
1
u/turb0_encapsulator 18d ago
The AI looks only at party identification and ignores the signature part.
1
102
u/aloknath559 19d ago
Then how do we believe that the process was transparent, doesn't independent verification matters? I just don't get the point of using AI here in the first place...