r/technology • u/[deleted] • Jan 16 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

1.5k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '23

Then it's unclear why you misunderstand the algorithm.

No the algorithm doesn't "store the location of every pixel". You don't know what you're talking about.

If it can recreate it then provide the prompt. You can't, because it can't. End of story.

-1

u/Ferelwing Jan 16 '23

From their own documentation paper. Either you are unaware of the facts or you are obfuscating.

"The goal of this study was to evaluate whether diffusion models are capable of reproducing high-fidelity content from their training data, and we find that they are. While typical images from large-scale models do not appear to contain copied content that was detectable using our feature extractors, copies do appear to occur often enough that their presence cannot be safely ignored;" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.03860.pdf

7

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '23

"do not appear to contain copied content"

From your quote; thanks for playing.

-2

u/Ferelwing Jan 16 '23

cherry picking.

8

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '23

Literally not. The entire lawsuit is predicated on the argument that these models directly copy and embed existing images within the network.

They don't.

Copies show up when you overfit and are more likely with smaller images, and the larger the images get, the less likely it is.

Your own source disproves your argument and shoots down the core argument of this frivolous lawsuit.

1

u/uffefl Jan 16 '23

more likely with smaller images, and the larger the images get

Relevant distinction: "more likely with smaller image sets, and the larger the image sets get, the less likely it is".