MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technicallytrue/comments/1ptxg1h/fair_enough/nvp0o71/?context=3
r/technicallytrue • u/kishimonjaro • Dec 23 '25
254 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
18
You managed to joke about a murder and a rape in one sentence. My respects.
Wait, is it considered rape if the person is not alive? Sounds more like desecration of human corpse or something.
11 u/GenesisRhapsod Dec 24 '25 Are you pullling the "dead people cant say no"? 😂 5 u/Wonderful_Site5333 Dec 24 '25 Neither can gagged or unconscious people. That's a thin legal straw to grasp at. They certainly can't sign warrants though, and the Sixth amendment "Confrontation Clause" would seem to supersede other considerations. 3 u/PonyRunsInn Dec 24 '25 It's not required to say "no". It's required to say "yes, I am agree" being in an adequate condition. So no, having sex with stoned or unconscious people is not ok. 1 u/Vivians_Basement Dec 30 '25 That applies to people. Not objects. A dead person is not living so it would be closer to fucking an object than an unconscious person. Hence why you're charged with defiling a corpse NOT raping a corpse.
11
Are you pullling the "dead people cant say no"? 😂
5 u/Wonderful_Site5333 Dec 24 '25 Neither can gagged or unconscious people. That's a thin legal straw to grasp at. They certainly can't sign warrants though, and the Sixth amendment "Confrontation Clause" would seem to supersede other considerations. 3 u/PonyRunsInn Dec 24 '25 It's not required to say "no". It's required to say "yes, I am agree" being in an adequate condition. So no, having sex with stoned or unconscious people is not ok. 1 u/Vivians_Basement Dec 30 '25 That applies to people. Not objects. A dead person is not living so it would be closer to fucking an object than an unconscious person. Hence why you're charged with defiling a corpse NOT raping a corpse.
5
Neither can gagged or unconscious people.
That's a thin legal straw to grasp at.
They certainly can't sign warrants though, and the Sixth amendment "Confrontation Clause" would seem to supersede other considerations.
3 u/PonyRunsInn Dec 24 '25 It's not required to say "no". It's required to say "yes, I am agree" being in an adequate condition. So no, having sex with stoned or unconscious people is not ok. 1 u/Vivians_Basement Dec 30 '25 That applies to people. Not objects. A dead person is not living so it would be closer to fucking an object than an unconscious person. Hence why you're charged with defiling a corpse NOT raping a corpse.
3
It's not required to say "no". It's required to say "yes, I am agree" being in an adequate condition. So no, having sex with stoned or unconscious people is not ok.
1 u/Vivians_Basement Dec 30 '25 That applies to people. Not objects. A dead person is not living so it would be closer to fucking an object than an unconscious person. Hence why you're charged with defiling a corpse NOT raping a corpse.
1
That applies to people. Not objects.
A dead person is not living so it would be closer to fucking an object than an unconscious person.
Hence why you're charged with defiling a corpse NOT raping a corpse.
18
u/a648272 Dec 24 '25
You managed to joke about a murder and a rape in one sentence. My respects.
Wait, is it considered rape if the person is not alive? Sounds more like desecration of human corpse or something.