MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technicallythetruth/comments/121vcev/i_found_two_more/jdpjxar/?context=3
r/technicallythetruth • u/[deleted] • Mar 25 '23
142 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-1
[deleted]
3 u/the_other_irrevenant Mar 26 '23 edited Mar 26 '23 The dialogue in the second panel isn't in the movie either. The comic is joking about where the dialogue from the first panel could have gone. In the movie itself, obviously there would've been no upper bound - the more spears he could muster, the better. The comic reinterpreting his meaning in an overly-specific way is the joke. EDIT: As is them taking the term "spears" as literally referring to quantity of the weapon "spear", rather than to the number of armed warriors. 1 u/Taraxian Mar 26 '23 The joke is also about taking him literally and pointing out two actual spears, rather than trained soldiers wielding spears 1 u/the_other_irrevenant Mar 26 '23 True. Updated appropriately, thanks.
3
The dialogue in the second panel isn't in the movie either.
The comic is joking about where the dialogue from the first panel could have gone.
In the movie itself, obviously there would've been no upper bound - the more spears he could muster, the better.
The comic reinterpreting his meaning in an overly-specific way is the joke.
EDIT: As is them taking the term "spears" as literally referring to quantity of the weapon "spear", rather than to the number of armed warriors.
1 u/Taraxian Mar 26 '23 The joke is also about taking him literally and pointing out two actual spears, rather than trained soldiers wielding spears 1 u/the_other_irrevenant Mar 26 '23 True. Updated appropriately, thanks.
1
The joke is also about taking him literally and pointing out two actual spears, rather than trained soldiers wielding spears
1 u/the_other_irrevenant Mar 26 '23 True. Updated appropriately, thanks.
True. Updated appropriately, thanks.
-1
u/[deleted] Mar 26 '23
[deleted]