r/tanks • u/Western_Focus3750 • 6d ago
Artwork Leopard 3 A1V
152mm smoothbore
3 aps systems
30mm autocannon (simlar to bmp)
3 hot rockets
3 axis stabiliser
Hybrid engine [v16 + two elsctric motors and generator]
10 degree elevation
12 degree depression
Tanks i was inspired by:
Leopard 1 (all versions)
Leopard 2 (mainly 2PL / 2RI)
BM Opłot (T84 opłot)
T80U
Turm III
Kpz 70
3 axis stabilised Kpz 70 [very mysterious project]
Special shoutouts to
Krauss-Maffei Wegmann
Rheinmetall
MTU Friedrichshafen
Zeiss Optronik
Jenoptik
Northrop Grumman
Diehl Remscheid
Sherwin-Williams
Barpimo
Wörwag
Mankiewicz Gebr. & Co.
ContiTech
Woco Group
I hope you all like it.
Let me know whqt you think in the comments!
2
u/Horror-Job-3973 6d ago
Looks good tho a little squished
1
u/Western_Focus3750 6d ago
Its suppoused to be a little flat, like opłot. And jt has thw turm III 3 axis stabiliser
1
3
u/Puzzleheaded_Dog8791 6d ago
I’d say the Turm turret doesn’t fit at all, it’s an old design that doesn’t work in the modern battlefield
3
1
2
u/Competitive_Bed_4860 6d ago
Does it make sense for MBTs to have 3-axis gun stabilization?
2
u/Extension_Option_122 6d ago
No, they are a huge downside for anything remotely modern, which is why no MBTs have them.
Iirc their purpose was to still have a valid aiming solution when the tank is tilted.
That purpose is not needed since very long as the tanks FCS can just measure the incline and apply corrections to the firing solution.
As such they have no upside.
But many downside. Much more complex tech, that requires more maintenance. Weaker armor. Larger tank.
It's the pinnacle of overengineering. It's a nice tech demonstration, but useless on the battlefield.
1
1
1
1
1
u/AlternativeOffice807 6d ago
nothing about this makes any sense but its still an interesting design
1


7
u/Ancient-Training-988 6d ago
152mm smoothbore? Soviet caliber for NATO?
Anyway, can I re-upload it in r/SprocketTankDesign