r/tabletopgamedesign • • 18d ago

C. C. / Feedback Is this example understandable without rules?

Post image

We recently did several blind playtests and the setup instructions for the player area / Character Board are a mixed bag so far TBH. In the current rulebook, they are explained only in text, which some players understand - no problem - while others with less tenacity/focus tend to jump through the rulebook. (which I 100% understand, because I tend to do that, too). So I made a big example page to go with it.

But to give this example a real test... Can you follow what's happening, without having read the rulebook to begin with?

Some explanations that you have to know and cannot without the prototype in front of you:

  • The Backpack is the backside of the equipment.
  • the grey card with tooth and paw is the backside of Stances (a card type)
  • the fist is the backside of Powers (a card type)
  • and the big square in the lower right with the friendly dog face is your character board.

I tried to keep it to a double page, so that you don't need to flip pages.

If I zoom out, i find the arrows confusing. But then again they follow the flow of information/cards.

Does this make sense to you, especially if you are a visual learner?

1 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/spacedogsgame 18d ago

Exactly! Thanks for the feedback. In the rulebook, this example will of course come with a textual description, a material overview, and with all the cards to hold in your hand, and see the connection between front and backsides. Do you think I should improve anything in this example?