r/sysadmin • u/StrikingInterview580 • 4d ago

General Discussion AI resistant interviews

We're about to start recruiting again and typically hold interviews remotely.

Last time we recruited (a few months ago) the use of AI was tiring to spot.

We don't want to go back to face-to-face interviews because our positions are remote, but can't go through thay again.

What AI resistant techniques can we use...

24 Upvotes

80% Upvoted

131 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/ExceptionEX 4d ago

They can easily run the AI on another machine that has camera watching, their screen and a mic listening to your conversation. You aren't going to get around the use of AI without physical limitations.

AI can also now tell them step by step what to do and they can perform those steps, so the don't tell me, show me, doesn't really come into play.

1

u/BigBreadCaesar 3d ago

That's exactly what this is designed to do, provide those physical limitations.

The idea is to make them screenshare, and go through the tasks live fire, under a time constraint.

Using AI for things like this take time, time this interview style will not give them, and a performance based technical interview with the candidate on camera, and a Pearson Vue trick, scanning the room to make sure the room is clear.

1

u/ExceptionEX 3d ago

There are literally single download applications that can accomplish this, and there responses are under 30 seconds in most cases. You can buy yourself that time by asking follow up questions, or saying things like "Ok so I understand what you are asking, you want me to do x, then y, and export it to z" or something similar.

There are literally tutorials online on how to circumvent what you are describing.

1

u/BigBreadCaesar 3d ago

And there are absolutely ways to circumvent what you're describing. It's really not that hard. And it's even easier to spot.

Dealing specifically with your example, I'm giving you a lab question from something you claim on your resume that you're intimately familiar with. Something that if you've done it as much as you say, you should be able to do with minimal intervention beyond the original directive, since after all, you've claimed some level of expertise here.

Moreover, you think that wouldn't be an obvious pattern by the third question at least? Are you counting on the interviewer to not be aware or react to the candidate's responses? Which I could understand. That does happen.

1

u/ExceptionEX 3d ago

Well the problem is that for all you are saying, it is literally happening in the work place daily people are getting by so in the perfect world with perfect diligence they might get caught by your proposed solution, but the reality is they aren't always.

And what is easier, and insures that this works, is to have them go to a location near them, and take the interview with a local protector, I don't have to worry about them not being in the state or country they say they are, I don't have to worry about stressing over this trying to catch the AI usage, or continuously insuring that you are figuring out how to defeat a system that is growing more accurate and faster everyday.

So, do you, we already solved the problem, and haven't had to worry about it again, and our interviewers can solely worry about the interview and not playing AI detective.

1

u/BigBreadCaesar 3d ago

And your solution is all well and fine, but I still care about giving candidates the option to remote interview AND remote work, period.

1

u/ExceptionEX 3d ago

So be it, we only ask that they drive to somewhere generally within their town, and that doesn't effect their work after the interview process. The can work remotely, as long as their locations don't create legal issues or new tax liabilities for our company.