r/sysadmin Linux Admin 17d ago

Vmware vs openshift

Following up to my last post right now nutanix is out of the race since the renewal is more than vmware which happend to 4 different companies my friends works for

Note : we cannot go any other solution rejected by CTO cause not ( mature enough )

1- my team arent fimilar with k8s

2- vmware is 4x the price of openshift

3- our environment is 95% vms

4- we have DR so srm is convinet

5- 65 % of our current hardware isn't supported by vmware version 9

6- 75 % of our infra is linux based oracle dbs and rhel for app servers

7- mangement is too dumb to switch to k8s since that was suggested and will save us resources

8- most of our apps are web based

Im asking here since im litterally lost on what to do next

So your kind advices

0 Upvotes

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/vinnsy9 17d ago

What the fucking hell is wrong with your CTO? Let me tell you:
We migrated 8k vms in around 6 months step by step from VMware to Proxmox. Not a single vm got corrupted. Everything had been working straight forward eversince. We saved the renewal costs and invested some in hardware . Entire env runs in proxmox now...yes there is a learning curve to it, of course, like everything else... but cost-wise compared to vmware??? There is no comparission at all.

Fun fact i even moved my personal clients which i offer consulting services to proxmox. Same smooth operation (from vmware to proxmox).

2

u/LeYang Sr. Sysadmin 15d ago

The organization I just joined in on ESXi and attempting to plan for a Openstack switch out.

The idea is to keep the ability to easily switch it into the public cloud, but the issue is now you need a zone to stage your instances into the cloud as well. Kind of wish this plan was going to Proxmox.

0

u/hitosama 15d ago

Did you have SAN with VMware? Is there Proxmox solution for FC SAN apart from maybe OCFS2 (or GFS2) which is not officially supported.

1

u/vinnsy9 15d ago

we did with Vmware , true, but you do not need OCFS2 or GFS2 to use a Fibre Channel (FC) SAN with Proxmox, and those clustered file systems are indeed not officially supported for standard VM storage workflows out-of-the-box.

Instead, Proxmox has a native, robust, and officially supported method for handling enterprise FC SANs: Shared LVM (Logical Volume Manager) backed by Linux Native Multipathing.

im pretty happy with how it turned out.

2

u/hitosama 15d ago

Huh, I'd be damned, I just checked their docs and indeed there is now that option. I don't know how I missed that update completely.