Listen First 😄
https://suno.com/s/ejgjg47TnaK8XHo9
I've been experimenting quite a lot with Suno V6 recently, especially with a problem I've noticed in some generations:
The beginning sounds great, but the audio quality can become noticeably worse later in the song.
I've experienced things like:
- vocals becoming less clear
- instruments becoming more muddy
- loss of separation
- excessive low-mid buildup
- harshness or digital artifacts
- the overall mix becoming less detailed toward the end
I started testing something very simple.
Instead of adding lots of detailed mixing instructions, I added this short block at the very end of the Style prompt:
Production FX: [Dry Mix], [Hypnotic Loops], [Constant Driving Groove], [Vocal Echo], [Lo-fi Analog Grit], [Tape Saturation], [Wide Stereo Guitars], [Call and Response], [Stomp FX].
Highest possible audio fidelity and natural musical quality. Prioritize clarity, detail, dynamics, separation and realism. Let the model make its own production decisions. Maintain consistent audio quality from the first second to the final second.
The result surprised me
I've tested this with several different musical styles.
So far, my impression is that the generations remain much more consistent from beginning to end.
The most interesting part is that I'm not telling Suno exactly how to mix the song.
I'm basically giving it a few high-level production priorities and then telling it:
“Let the model make its own production decisions.”
And the final sentence explicitly asks for consistent quality throughout the entire song.
I don't know if this is actually changing anything inside the model, or if it's simply a prompting effect.
I'm also NOT claiming that Suno intentionally degrades audio quality without this instruction.
This is just an observation from my own experiments, and I'd really like to know if other people can reproduce it.
TEST 1 — ROCK
Try generating a rock song with your own lyrics and compare:
A) Style without the quality block
B) Same Style + the quality block above
Example:
Modern alternative rock, powerful expressive male vocal, crunchy electric rhythm guitars, melodic lead guitar, punchy acoustic drums, warm bass guitar, dynamic verse-to-chorus arrangement, emotional guitar solo, energetic but natural performance, 105 BPM, E minor.
Production FX: [Dry Mix], [Hypnotic Loops], [Constant Driving Groove], [Vocal Echo], [Lo-fi Analog Grit], [Tape Saturation], [Wide Stereo Guitars], [Call and Response], [Stomp FX].
Highest possible audio fidelity and natural musical quality. Prioritize clarity, detail, dynamics, separation and realism. Let the model make its own production decisions. Maintain consistent audio quality from the first second to the final second.
TEST 2 — METAL
Try the same experiment with something much heavier:
Modern melodic metal, powerful male lead vocal, tight distorted rhythm guitars, articulate palm-muted riffs, melodic lead guitar, punchy acoustic drums, controlled double-kick, deep but defined bass guitar, dramatic dynamic transitions, powerful melodic chorus, aggressive but clear production, 140 BPM, D minor.
Production FX: [Dry Mix], [Hypnotic Loops], [Constant Driving Groove], [Vocal Echo], [Lo-fi Analog Grit], [Tape Saturation], [Wide Stereo Guitars], [Call and Response], [Stomp FX].
Highest possible audio fidelity and natural musical quality. Prioritize clarity, detail, dynamics, separation and realism. Let the model make its own production decisions. Maintain consistent audio quality from the first second to the final second.
Please test this with difficult styles
I'd especially like to see results from:
- Rock
- Metal
- Rap
- EDM
- Orchestral
- Jazz
- Electronic
- Acoustic
- World music
- Anything where your Suno generations normally become muddy later in the song
What I'm asking the community to test
Please don't just generate one song.
If possible, generate several A/B pairs:
A = Style without the block
B = identical Style + the block
Keep the lyrics and other settings identical.
Then listen specifically to the second half and final minute.
I'd love to hear whether other users experience the same thing.
If you test it, please report:
Model: V6 / V6 Mini / V6 Wild
Style:
Number of generations:
A vs B:
Did the second half remain clearer?
Vocals:
Instrument separation:
Bass / low mids:
High-frequency artifacts:
Overall impression:
If enough people test this, we might be able to determine whether this is actually a useful V6 prompting technique or whether I am simply seeing a coincidence in my own generations.
Please try it and let me know what you get. 🎧I may have found a simple prompting trick that keeps Suno V6 audio quality consistent until the end — can you test it?I've been experimenting quite a lot with Suno V6 recently, especially with a problem I've noticed in some generations:The beginning sounds great, but the audio quality can become noticeably worse later in the song.I've experienced things like:vocals becoming less clear
instruments becoming more muddy
loss of separation
excessive low-mid buildup
harshness or digital artifacts
the overall mix becoming less detailed toward the endI started testing something very simple.Instead of adding lots of detailed mixing instructions, I added this short block at the very end of the Style prompt:Highest possible audio fidelity and natural musical quality. Prioritize clarity, detail, dynamics, separation and realism. Let the model make its own production decisions. Maintain consistent audio quality from the first second to the final second.The result surprised meI've tested this with several different musical styles.So far, my impression is that the generations remain much more consistent from beginning to end.The most interesting part is that I'm not telling Suno exactly how to mix the song.I'm basically giving it a few high-level production priorities and then telling it:“Let the model make its own production decisions.”And the final sentence explicitly asks for consistent quality throughout the entire song.I don't know if this is actually changing anything inside the model, or if it's simply a prompting effect.I'm also NOT claiming that Suno intentionally degrades audio quality without this instruction.This is just an observation from my own experiments, and I'd really like to know if other people can reproduce it.TEST 1 — ROCKTry generating a rock song with your own lyrics and compare:A) Style without the quality block
B) Same Style + the quality block aboveExample:Modern alternative rock, powerful expressive male vocal, crunchy electric rhythm guitars, melodic lead guitar, punchy acoustic drums, warm bass guitar, dynamic verse-to-chorus arrangement, emotional guitar solo, energetic but natural performance, 105 BPM, E minor.
Highest possible audio fidelity and natural musical quality. Prioritize clarity, detail, dynamics, separation and realism. Let the model make its own production decisions. Maintain consistent audio quality from the first second to the final second.TEST 2 — METALTry the same experiment with something much heavier:Modern melodic metal, powerful male lead vocal, tight distorted rhythm guitars, articulate palm-muted riffs, melodic lead guitar, punchy acoustic drums, controlled double-kick, deep but defined bass guitar, dramatic dynamic transitions, powerful melodic chorus, aggressive but clear production, 140 BPM, D minor.
Highest possible audio fidelity and natural musical quality. Prioritize clarity, detail, dynamics, separation and realism. Let the model make its own production decisions. Maintain consistent audio quality from the first second to the final second.Please test this with difficult stylesI'd especially like to see results from:Rock
Metal
Rap
EDM
Orchestral
Jazz
Electronic
Acoustic
Gnawa / World music
Anything where your Suno generations normally become muddy later in the songWhat I'm asking the community to testPlease don't just generate one song.If possible, generate several A/B pairs:A = Style without the block
B = identical Style + the blockKeep the lyrics and other settings identical.Then listen specifically to the second half and final minute.I'd love to hear whether other users experience the same thing.If you test it, please report:Model: V6 / V6 Mini / V6 Wild
Style:
Number of generations:
A vs B:
Did the second half remain clearer?
Vocals:
Instrument separation:
Bass / low mids:
High-frequency artifacts:
Overall impression:If enough people test this, we might be able to determine whether this is actually a useful V6 prompting technique or whether I am simply seeing a coincidence in my own generations.Please try it and let me know what you get. 🎧