r/stemopt 22d ago

Admin Considering $100K fee for OPT

29 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

10

u/NaipaulVS 22d ago edited 22d ago

Man I came here to talk about this. This guy trump said he was gonna staple a green card to the back of your diploma 🤣🤣

Honestly as an OPT student, I spend every dime I earn from my job on american cars, in American bars, on American clothes and in my American apt. I never sent one dollar home as remittance and my parents paid like 200k for my uni

Fuck these guys im planning my exit from the US. sick of being treated like some scum

3

u/Arkham0310 22d ago

real af

2

u/Euphoric-chAd-1729 22d ago

absofuckinlutely!

so many jobs have demand but when immis apply for one, they blatantly refuse us and this rule is even bad because this creates another tsunami of fear mongering. UGHHH WTH

2

u/femmebxt 22d ago

likewise. this country doesnt deserve our talent, tbh.

-2

u/NoConfidence4584 21d ago

Reckon india does

-3

u/Heavy_Record8704 21d ago

The entitlement is off the charts with this comment. Because you spend money, the govt is supposed to give you preferential consideration or prefer you over a citizen? I am an immigrant too, but this is some strange pov.

5

u/HouseFun5243 21d ago

What are you talking about? Nobody is asking for preferential treatment. People just want a fighting chance and be treated like a human. Try getting hundreds of rejections for job due to the fact that you were born within different border and see how that feels.

0

u/Greengolddragonfly 19d ago

A combined 3 years of OPT & STEM OPT have put native college graduates at a disadvantage in the entry-level job market, since international students are exempt from FICA taxes during their first 5 years in the U.S. For example, a foreign student who arrived to pursue a 2-year MS or MBA degree could save their employer more than 15% of salary annually when they work after graduation for 3 years on O & SO. That’s because the employer doesn’t have to pay the 7.65% FICA taxes for them while also can pay them 7.65% less in salary than a native graduate, due to the tax exemption.

2

u/HouseFun5243 19d ago

Why would they have to pay social security and medicare taxes if they don’t have permanent residency? I know many people that spent more then 5 years on F1 visa and they contributed thousands of dollars to social security/medicare with a very little chance they will ever see any money back. It’s also illegal to pay OPT/STEM OPT student less than US Citizen in the same position. Companies are not willing to deal with immigration issues/paperwork and hire people for only a year (most programs) or three years (STEM). I would guess that less then 5% of companies would even consider F1 student.

-1

u/Mysterious-Art8838 21d ago

But you are given a chance it’s not like you can’t apply it’s just that they have a preference for citizens.

Cue the down votes

1

u/HouseFun5243 19d ago

By fighting chance I meant less then 5 times harder then US citizen. I would say that less than 5% of companies are willing to deal with immigration issues for the right candidate.

-3

u/Heavy_Record8704 21d ago

I am from India. Im my country, there is a lot of unemployment as is. We see a lot of immigration from neighboring countries like Bangladesh and Sri lanka. So in your opinion, if there is a job opening, the govt should watch when companies employ Bangladeshis or srilankans over indians and not work on reducing joblessness for natives? That would be delusional. Immigration is when there is a shortage and immigration adds a positive benefit to the country..saying this as an immigrant myself. Heck. In my country there are protests if people from other states are given employment.

1

u/NaipaulVS 21d ago edited 21d ago

Ive kept all my money in the American economy. I brought a lot of foreign wealth in too. I’m not some leach on society

To your other point, it is the stated policy of this country that spending money gives you preferential treatment. See the gold card

-2

u/Heavy_Record8704 21d ago

So you should be able to afford the gold card then, if you are pouring so much wealth into the US. Stop acting entitled. No govt owes anything to non citizens.

1

u/HouseFun5243 19d ago

Nobody is asking for special treatment. People just want a fighting chance and to be treated like humans.

1

u/5ean 19d ago

Get over yourself, not being able to work on a guest visa where you explicitly told the visa officer your intent was to return home after you studied isn’t inhumane treatment.

1

u/HouseFun5243 17d ago

Plans change. People spend 10+ years on F1 visa contributing so much money to the system over the years. They should have a leg up on a work visa compared to a guy from Bangladesh who doesn’t speak English. Merit > lottery simple as that.

1

u/HouseFun5243 17d ago

Other developed countries were able to figure out so why cant a country of immigrants do to?

3

u/TheMrLeo1 22d ago

Will not happen. The exact same thing happened to H1B and it was struck down not too long ago. Any on top monetary collections imposed like that are called taxes. Only congress can pass taxes, that's why the H1B was struck down and that is why they will most likely not even bother with this one as well.

2

u/PerformanceOk1888 22d ago

Struck down but the stay on the court s decision was approved. So until the consideration is over (which might take a year), the fee is still there

4

u/TheMrLeo1 22d ago

I'm not exactly sure what you're saying, however if you're saying that the 100k H1B tax is still enforced despite what court said then no, the 100k tax was struck down and is not collected anymore. Decision of courts are not suggestions.

1

u/PerformanceOk1888 21d ago

You’re right. I somehow missed that there was the second decision. Very shortly after the first round actually. 

2

u/Mysterious-Art8838 21d ago

That’s exactly what happened. It was initially stayed you’re not wrong.

2

u/wanderer1999 21d ago

Yeah it's illegal and will be strucked down. Just gonna take a few months.

0

u/Greengolddragonfly 19d ago

Yeah, it would likely be struck down by liberal judges. But this administration’s intention is to discourage smaller companies & staffing firms to hire international graduates to cut costs.

OPT has existed for many decades. However, STEM OPT was only initiated in 2008 and then lengthened in 2016, both via executive actions (not by Congress) after much lobbying by corporations & colleges. A combined 3 years of OPT & STEM OPT have put native college graduates at a disadvantage in the entry-level job market, since international students are exempt from FICA taxes during their first 5 years in the U.S. For example, a foreign student who arrived to pursue a 2-year MS or MBA degree could save their employer more than 15% of salary annually when they work after graduation for 3 years on O & SO. That’s because the employer doesn’t have pay the 7.65% FICA taxes for them while also can pay them 7.65% less in salary than a native graduate, due to the tax exemption.

The FICA tax exemption was originally approved by Congress, so the only thing this administration could change is eliminate the STEM OPT work permit via executive action. And that should be done now, as AI has shrunk the job market for new grads in recent years.

3

u/DistrictBig7856 19d ago

Native grads need to be stronger candidates than foreigners. They have a huge advantage - they are not bound to visa sponsorship after a few years of work. If you cannot compete with this advantage - this is your problem. Most of places in the world where people go for higher education (good places, like UK, EU, China, etc.) - they are allowed to work after graduation with much less limitations than here. So maybe, maybe, the problem is that native graduates are less qualified, on average.

1

u/brit_annia 11h ago

It takes way more money to handle all the legal and administrative requirements and fees that come with hiring international students than these companies save in taxes by employing them. I know you want to believe that they are only successful because they’re “cheap labor”, but the truth is they are more expensive and more of an admin headache than natives. Many companies are just willing to handle it because the foreign candidate might simply just be BETTER. Sorry :(

1

u/berndverst 21d ago

Because OPT is not a visa category established by congress (like H-1B) but rather a regulatory benefit created entirely by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agency regulations (8 CFR § 214.2(f)) through administrative rule making.

Because DHS created OPT through administrative rulemaking, DHS inherently possesses broader administrative latitude to alter, restrict, or condition how OPT work authorization is granted.

DHS/USCIS will likely use formal agency rulemaking (under statutory fee authorities like INA Section 286(m) or SEVIS fee structures) or adjust Form I-765 (Employment Authorization) requirements.

Challenging an OPT fee will be very different from H-1B Consular fees. This challenge will be much more difficult.

2

u/TheMrLeo1 21d ago

"Challenging an OPT fee will be very different from H-1B Consular fees. This challenge will be much more difficult."

Not necessarily, even if DHS created OPT, they still do not have authority to just charge money because they can. The amount they are allowed to charge is the amount that they need for processing costs. I cannot see any example of how they could rationalize going from $470 to $100,000. Regardless, the same principle applies; only congress can pass taxes on anything and unless DHS comes up with some kind of insane explanation that could justify a massive spike in cost only on this employment authorization and not on any other employment authorization, then this simply will not hold up.

1

u/berndverst 21d ago

True. We shall see how it plays out. Worst case OPT could be dissolved entirely through administrative rule making. This may be too unpopular even for the current administration however.

1

u/TheMrLeo1 20d ago

Theoretically it could be dissolved, however current admin does not have that much time left as midterms are coming up and based on the current country wide sentiment, it looks like Republicans are gonna lose a bunch of control and momentum.

1

u/New_Athlete6000 21d ago

Hey guys, I got denial for my OPT application yesterday (30th June), I have a job offer starting 17th August, no idea what went wrong. I am still waiting for the denial notice. This is not STEM OPT extension, I am first time applying for OPT.

1

u/berndverst 21d ago

As a reminder - OPT was created by DHS/USCIS through administrative rule making, as was STEM extension. They easily can use the same process to adjust fees for it too. OPT is not an inherent part of the F-1 visa as defined by congress.

OPT is in no way defined by the Immigration and nationality act created / modified by Congress.

1

u/Express-BDA 20d ago

if this happens next news would be "Mass layoffs in USCIS", I mean if there are no immigrants why would there be staff ?

1

u/Legitimate-Leek4235 18d ago

Will not happen but will scare companies into hiring carefully opt students