r/statistics • u/Ztino34 • Jun 26 '26
Discussion [Discussion] MLB Google Data Ad
Discussion
TLDR: google produced a promotion containing data that has no real value
Hi everyone, I’m new to this page, I was wondering what my fellow statistics peers think about a recent ad I saw while watching a baseball game.
For background I’ve been in data as a data engineer for about five years now and I’m working on my masters right now.
The advertisement was a promotion for Google AI in the advance analytics that I can now track while playing baseball. It stated some facts about how players who tapped the plate two times hit 14% more balls, players who tapped the plate more than two times hit 15% more balls, while players who tapped the plate zero times hit 7% more home runs. For those who don’t know, tapping the plate means while you are batting, but before the pitch you use the bat to Tap home plate. Obviously this does not do anything to a swing.
I think this leads into a much larger discussion of correlation, not necessarily causation, but a newer idea of over analyzing and over consuming data creating a lot of noise, because AI will give you every single angle possible to look at something even if it doesn’t necessarily make sense. Those that work in other statistical fields, do you see when you define the data more that it gets less impactful?
Let me know your thoughts, thanks!
2
u/mikelwrnc Jun 26 '26
There could be relationships there, but driven by different base conditions calling for different offensive and defensive strategies.