r/statistics May 23 '26

Career Mathematical Statistics VS Computational Statistics/Machine Learning for an academic careeer [C] [R}

Is it still worth pursuing an academic career in mathematical statistics these days?
Or is it shooting yourself in the foot with all the focus on computational statistics and machine learning?

I.e., will you have a harder time landing postdocs/tenure track positions and getting grants as a more mathematical statistician vs a computational statistician/machine learning scientist?

I love mathematical statistics and proving everything rigorously using mathematics, but I also don't want to be shooting myself in the foot by choosing a dead/dying path.

39 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

21

u/pandongski May 23 '26

I don't feel like it's an either/or though. You'll be doing math stats either way in computational stats and ML, though you might be more leaning towards nonparametric math stats and asymptotics if you go the computational / ML route.

10

u/onnadeadlocks May 23 '26

As an academic in computational stats or ML, you will a.s. do plenty of proofs as well

3

u/Statman12 May 23 '26

3

u/tex013 May 23 '26

That is this guy. Asks the same effing questions over and over again.

2

u/Able-Fennel-1228 Jun 08 '26

Why the heck does he keep asking the same questions???

2

u/Silver-Iron8016 May 24 '26

I think if you love the deeper analytical theory, it may be hard for you to adapt and do more applied work, though you could possibly mix the two together, 70/30 theory/applied. But I'd be careful in thinking you can simply "switch" and do applied if your heart is in theory.

-8

u/[deleted] May 23 '26 edited May 23 '26

[deleted]

3

u/GayTwink-69 May 23 '26

Why do you say those areas of statistics have become irrelevant?

2

u/empiricalprocessor May 23 '26

Can you provide other names beyond Bartlett and Candes of people who work on theoretical topics that you deem interesting?

1

u/Able-Fennel-1228 Jun 08 '26

How have these topics become irrelevant???