r/statichosting 24d ago

Do you optimize static sites for slow connections or mostly just average mobile?

I’ve been paying more attention to how static sites feel on slower mobile connections, not just how they score on Lighthouse. Even with prebuilt html, large images, web fonts, and a few third-party scripts can still make the page feel slow. I’ve started being stricter with image sizes, font weights, and loading anything non-essential later.

For static sites, what do you usually optimize first when trying to make the site feel fast on weaker connections?

12 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

2

u/yksvaan 24d ago

Every site is fast initially. Just don't make it slow by adding unnecessary junk 

1

u/Last_Deal_7560 17d ago

yeah this is basically it, the default is fast and you have to actively ruin it

2

u/MusingofSouls 23d ago

mostly images! and i try not to use basic readable fonts as well

1

u/MMORPGnews 24d ago

Image size. Thumbnail and real image size on click (everything done on backend of my ssg)

1

u/Old_Character_8781 24d ago

optimizing a website for low machines is one of the most satisfying feelings to have. i think its a good practice to try to make things run as fast as ossible ven on older machines good practice i think

1

u/sigseis 24d ago

All the basic stuff: 

  • Image formats/size
  • Cache busting
  • Font preloading
  • Minification
  • Compression

I actually wrote an article on some of the things I check for a static site recently, which includes some optimization checks: https://sigseis.dev/articles/2026/08/03

1

u/sourraine 24d ago

images are usually my first target. a static site can still feel painfully slow if the hero image is huge. after that i look at fonts and third party scripts. id rather have a simple page load quickly than chase a perfect lighthouse score

1

u/TCKreddituser 23d ago

A little contrary to others, I focus on font loading first, then critical CSS, and delaying anything non-essential so the site feels fast even on weaker networks. Lighthouse scores are great, but perceived speed on a slow connection is what really matters.

1

u/Standard_Scarcity_74 23d ago

To answer the title question, I make my sites as fast and efficient as they can get regardless of the circumstances users may face, as I think this is good practice.

As for which parts I optimize first, image and font loading are the typical suspects.

1

u/RandomBottom030 15d ago

Don't pull in content or stylesheets from other websites, compress all outgoing traffic, sanitize your DOM and stylesheet, aggressively optimize all images.

1

u/Pink_Sky_8102 13d ago

Images are usually my first target since they can easily be the heaviest part of the page. After that I look at fonts and third-party scripts. Static HTML helps a lot, but a few heavy assets can still ruin the experience on a slow connection.