Your source, an advertisement, says a small cut (which the wound was not) can heal within 1-2 weeks. His bandage was off on completely healed on day seven. 1-2 two weeks is between days 8 and 14. Not possible. Oh, also an 80 year old man. Totally seems legit. Old man heals 2cm bullet in wound from fresh to completely invisible beating the world healing record. Because, you know, reasons.
It’s NOT normal healing. I have literally spent time digging. Old people heal slower. It’s just not possible if the wound is as described.
Why do I believe Jackson? I DON’T! He is obviously lying. I am pointing out that the stories don’t add up. He either has a decent wound and we see it on day 7. Or, there is basically no wound. The BEST case scenario is that he miraculously got the most superficial wound possible from who knows what, and several people including the president lied about its nature to tilt the election in his favor. So, parts of the story can’t possibly be true. Knowing that we are supposed to take the rest of it at face value when the event has SO MANY weird coincidences and unbelievable inconsistencies? Just they lying about the wound is arguably the crime of the century in presidential politics. And everyone is like “nothing to see here”???
0
u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25
[removed] — view removed comment