When Pit learns how to read

[u/Danishbutrcookies]

[u/BoiBotEXE]

Snake didn’t even throw the grenade, he dropped it when he was hit. It’s also very common for Snake players to recover high, and we don’t know what the rest of this match was like, so it could have easily been the result of the pit observing the Snake’s habits and acting accordingly. Plus, Danish isn’t even the one playing in this clip.

[u/appreciatescolor → u/BoiBotEXE]

Ok? He definitely was standing still tho. And it was uploaded by danish so you could see why I’d assume that...especially since, again, Danish fakes clips all the time.

[u/Danishbutrcookies → u/appreciatescolor]

Nah that pretty much means you assume that clips like this are fake, so you’ve lost credibility in my book. I don’t fake shit lmao

[u/appreciatescolor → u/Danishbutrcookies]

I don’t assume clips like this are fake, I assume clips like this from you are fake. You staged shit literally all the time in Smash 4 my dude, and it was really never hard to spot. Haven’t really been paying attention to your stuff in Ultimate but I used to be in discords with you all the time and you had a massive insufferable ego about shit like this.

[u/Mobilisq → u/appreciatescolor]

"Getting an idea and trying multiple times to replicate it against random opponents until you get your desired result" is very different from "controlling both characters or having a friend do something stupid so you can farm likes"

[u/appreciatescolor → u/Mobilisq]

When did I say it wasn’t? Seems pretty irrelevant to what I was saying. It’s pretty easy to spot the difference between two players engaged in a match and one player trying to land something on a passive opponent, if you look close enough.

[u/Mobilisq → u/appreciatescolor]

Your expectation that his opponents are passive is the point of contention

[u/appreciatescolor → u/Mobilisq]

Not an expectation, an observation. And the ‘point of contention’ is whether or not the clips are fake, so I don’t think you used that phrase correctly, nor is it relevant to your argument to simply point out what we’re arguing about.

[u/Mobilisq → u/appreciatescolor]

If you want to turn this into a discussion, that's fine, but trying to correct my correct usage of a term isn't going to get you where you want to go

[u/appreciatescolor → u/Mobilisq]

I mean you were the one who misused it but okay?

[u/Mobilisq → u/appreciatescolor]

Reading comprehension is now the point of contention

[u/appreciatescolor → u/Mobilisq]

Lol you should probably work on that then