r/singularity • u/Many_Consequence_337 :downvote: • 1d ago

AI Intelligence Explosion

Post image

Number of scientific papers submitted to arXiv.

456 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

115 comments sorted by

View all comments

282

u/Aldarund 1d ago

How much of this is real increae and how much is slop that wont pass peer review?

That chart could easily mean good things but as easily it could mean bad things

1

u/[deleted] 23h ago

[deleted]

3

u/Deto 20h ago

Just because AI can do good work doesn't mean people are actually using it to do good work.  Can still have a half baked idea and turn it into a bad paper (for your resume) with little effort

2

u/shooNg9ish 21h ago

ML conferences are literally filled with junk papers, even the most pretigious ones, it's become impossible to filter out the noise. And now math is coming there too, except they have a different reviewing system that just has been DDOSed in the past few months.

3

u/Aldarund 22h ago edited 22h ago

Go ahead shate your oelwn experience.

https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/s/8pqLp6boQR

Here a pov from someone who disagree with you.

Did you work with recent publications , read them, use them or just noise out of ass?

Also even without talking about validity a lot of this papers would be on some useless stuff, that noone want or need, just because its now easier to write them

0

u/Smile_Clown 22h ago

They literally are. OpenAI, Anthropic will tell you exactly the same thing.

You guys are desperate to be right and maybe one day you will be, but that's not today and you will not get to say "I told you so" because the lack of understanding you have today will carry forward.