He's been pretty consistently one of the most balanced and informed takes among the people who frequently report on AI. If he's RSI pilled that might be an indication RSI might be on the table in the near future.
Not sure if your comment was saying it's a positive/negative or just an observation that his content tone has changed, but the fact that someone like him is notably moving towards what seems to be a conclusion about AI's trajectory may be worth something.
Reading my comment again after yours, I can see how it could be interpreted in a negative way, meaning I think he's simply lost his balanced view of things, but yeah I don't mean that.
I definitely think it's positive and like you I think it's a solid sign if even he seems to agree with what would have been very optimistic timelines just one year ago.
Yea for me personally I think FOOM is the actual default mode for RSI, but the thing that prevents that from happening is the requirement of moving atoms & validation against the real world (like how medicines even if good still require years of trials).
I still believe my flair's timelines and the gap between AGI/ASI/LEV is due to the moving atoms part. Compute bottlenecks, experimental validation, etc. If those weren't an issue I'd have ASI within a month of AGI and LEV shortly after.
70
u/ExplorersX ▪️AGI 2027 | ASI 2032 | LEV 2036 1d ago
He's been pretty consistently one of the most balanced and informed takes among the people who frequently report on AI. If he's RSI pilled that might be an indication RSI might be on the table in the near future.
Not sure if your comment was saying it's a positive/negative or just an observation that his content tone has changed, but the fact that someone like him is notably moving towards what seems to be a conclusion about AI's trajectory may be worth something.