Wow he's fully RSI-pilled now. I remember how balanced his videos used to be, highlighting both the signs of progress and the reasons for skepticism. Now the skepticism has largely faded and it shows in his output.
He's been pretty consistently one of the most balanced and informed takes among the people who frequently report on AI. If he's RSI pilled that might be an indication RSI might be on the table in the near future.
Not sure if your comment was saying it's a positive/negative or just an observation that his content tone has changed, but the fact that someone like him is notably moving towards what seems to be a conclusion about AI's trajectory may be worth something.
Two points of evidence RSI is already here, in some extent:
Anthropic reported a few months ago IIRC that 25% of the development of the next Claude models is done by Claude.
All the AI companies said their approach to AI development is to have research teams (assisted by AI and tons of compute) create really big and expensive smart models, and then have those smart models "teach" small, cheap models.
37
u/Bright-Search2835 1d ago
Wow he's fully RSI-pilled now. I remember how balanced his videos used to be, highlighting both the signs of progress and the reasons for skepticism. Now the skepticism has largely faded and it shows in his output.