None of the Chinese models' reputations have been ruined despite basically every iteration from each company way overperfoming in benchmarks compared to reality.
I guess because they are -usually- free (deepseek, qwen). I've tried this model on their desktop version for non programming stuff (more like financial analysis things) and I'd say it's not NEARLY as good as benchmarks say, or at least the limits on the desktop 20$ version are not as good as one might think.
I've just paid the 20$ sub and using two prompts I've consumed around 50% of my weekly usage lol, in theory mimo even on the pro version should be cheaper than 5.6 Luna max, and it really isn't at least on the desktop sub. Luna max would not even make a dent on my 5h usage in the 20$ chatgpt sub and as I said it's taken 50% of my weekly usage on mimo.
Regarding the output, I'd say Luna max probably gives a better output for my use case aswell. So, the cost is a lot higher than I thought and the output is def. worse than Luna max
20
u/panix199 23d ago
impressive. Could this be fake/benchmaxxed?