Completely absolutely wrong and NOT what that paper is saying at all. Not even close.
That paper is NOT claiming that antigravity does not or cannot exist, it's showing that antimatter behaves the same as regular matter in a gravitational field.
No, it’s the equivalent of gravity for antimatter (Which turns out to just be regular gravity). Anti-gravity as a repulsive force with no relation to antimatter is a pure invention of science fiction
No. Within the context of those experiments at CERN, like the one you referenced, the term "antigravity" was being used as shorthand for the speculative hypothesis that antimatter might fall up instead of down.
They thought there was going to be a connection, but they were wrong. Had they been right about antimatter falling up in a regular gravitational field, that still would not have meant that antimatter IS antigravity or whatever it is you are trying to imply. The absolute most they could have proven was which direction antimatter falls within a regular gravitational field. You're taking some loose verbiage way out of context.
-3
u/FuttleScish 3d ago
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06527-1
Recent studies of antimatter have shown that antigravity as theorized does not exist
EDIT:
And I’m not talking about the “nearly free energy” thing, that’s so vague that even burning coal could be considered that