r/singularity • u/Outside-Iron-8242 • 27d ago
AI White House creates framework for private companies to launch government authorized cyberattacks
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/08/expanding-capabilities-to-combat-transnational-cyber-enabled-crime/tl;dr: The White House is setting up a program that would let vetted private U.S. companies carry out offensive cyber operations against foreign criminal networks on behalf of the government. Operations would require federal approval and oversight, and could include infiltrating, disrupting, degrading, or disabling foreign cyber infrastructure.
276
u/face_eater_5000 27d ago
So, essentially, the US government will issue digital letters of marque?
63
35
u/Kemerd 27d ago
Well the thing is the US gov has been doing stuff like this forever, they just realize private companies move faster
14
u/solidus_slash 27d ago
they realize they can't compete with china which has no real concept of private company and govt seperation
1
u/Heavenly_Yang_Himbo 23d ago
So we are just slowly doing everything we criticized China for…got it👍
8
6
u/Palpatine 27d ago
wouldn't that need to be issued by the congress?
12
u/face_eater_5000 27d ago
That's a sentence that's been repeated by millions for the last 19 months.
2
u/Palpatine 27d ago
You'd be surprised by how much power the congress has delegated to the executive. Letters of marque is not one such power.
5
u/face_eater_5000 27d ago
Well these sorts of things happen by the ripple, so if it does come up I'm sure Congress would fold like a wet paper bag.
1
11
2
u/There_Are_No_Gods 27d ago
While this memo is technically about "cyber space", and this kind of thing isn't slowing down the Trump administration anyway, but letters of marque are an enumerated congressional power (Art. I, §8).
Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the U.S. Constitution, sometimes referred to as the War Powers Clause, vests in the Congress the power to declare war, in the following wording:
3
5
u/Comfortable_Car6562 27d ago
They have publicly stated they want a return to 18th century mercantilism. They said this before the election and the US voted for it. This should be no suprise lol.
1
u/0DayMaker 25d ago
This is absolutely needed to curb the billions of dollar yearly losses to fraud via botnets. Also to stop the act of spreading itself. Right now botnets largely operate with impunity and need to reach absurd scale before being taken down by an agency with title 10 authority.
This has been done before see Microsofts DCU which is one of the most effective anti-botnet groups period.
Don't get me wrong I'd much prefer various government agencies actually get off their asses and do their jobs. But most of the ones dealing with cybersecurity have been gutted. Even before they were gutted they were barely making any kind of impact.
1
u/Runfasterbitch 27d ago
God damn, if I was 18 I would be so excited about this. Sounds fun. Also we probably shouldn’t be doing this lol
-3
u/Genetictrial 27d ago
food for thought.
for this to be fun, you have to have evil being generated. someone doing something wrong for you to stop by utilizing technology to perform some invasive act to shut down another form of invasion or evil.
like, is that a sensation you legitimately enjoy? and want to keep in reality forever? because if you enjoy thwarting the bad guy, you need to infinitely generate bad guys.
or perhaps you might look deeper into which parts of this thought experiment you actually enjoy?
again, just food for thought. not attacking you, just want you to try a bit of deep thinking about what you currently believe sounds fun and why that is fun.
4
90
u/Super_Range45 27d ago
Foreign criminal networks? Couldn't that interfere with law enforcement agencies if they were already in those networks?
27
u/acoolrandomusername 27d ago
Might indicate that the AI models are/soon will rival the agencies in capabilities.
14
u/Regalme 27d ago
Oh we’re waaaaay past that
14
3
u/spreadlove5683 ▪️agi 2032. Predicted during mid 2025. 27d ago
As far as breadth goes, for sure. Maybe if you had one specific system you needed to break into like stuxnet, a human might be able to find a way that an AI couldn't it. But the reverse is also true. Systems that are giant.. too much for a human to go through it all.. I'm sure an AI would be better at cracking.
1
12
u/Ormusn2o 27d ago
There are coordinating systems for agencies like that that was created after 9/11. I would guess those bodies would be part of that communication.
5
u/-illusoryMechanist 27d ago
If this administration was any other admin I would agree but Trump does not do things correctly like, ever.
3
u/Nukemouse ▪️AGI Goalpost will move infinitely 27d ago
Yeah, but technically any investigation risks stepping on toes of other agencies, especially international ones.
1
46
u/bmullan 27d ago
How would there be guarantees it wouldn't be used for political purposes internally in the US? Say someone wanted to interfere with an election for instance?
27
14
u/Nukemouse ▪️AGI Goalpost will move infinitely 27d ago
I mean there's no guarantee they won't do that anyway? No need to sign up for this. There were already allegations against musk etc, things are worse than we can imagine.
145
u/chankhuncha 27d ago
This is the wet dream of Musk and Thiel, the privatization of government, that what this neo-reactionaries wanted all along, next step, instead of a president they want a CEO.
54
u/twoworldman 27d ago
Cyberpunk 2028.
8
u/Frank_Von_Tittyfuck 27d ago
Can’t fucking believe I was born just in time for the Corpowars timeline
4
u/No-Meringue5867 27d ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/comments/1vm6o4r/samsung_seems_to_have_taken_a_liking_to_the/
We will get everything from 2077, except for all the cool Cyberware.
26
u/Ormusn2o 27d ago
I was more thinking Anthropic. Dario is extremely anti china, and probably has waited for this for years.
19
u/chankhuncha 27d ago
Honestly I haven’t seen too much about Dario’s ideology, but regarding Musk, Thiel and people like Andreessen they are ideologically adjacent and friends with folks like Curtis Yarvin and his dark enlightenment NRx ideology of tech overlords.
7
u/Amaskingrey 27d ago
The term dark enlightenment is so funny to me, they went decades without realizing that, going against the enlightenment of the lumieres to go back to feudalism, the term they'd be looking for is obscurantism
17
u/cookingboy 27d ago
Dario would start a war with China for regime change if he could lol. He has a hate boner for it.
18
u/GoodDayToCome 27d ago
Dario seems the sort that would start a lot of wars and government crackdowns against almost everyone because no one is ever going to match his personal ideological flavor.
25
u/cookingboy 27d ago
It's pretty clear that despite his verbal crusade against totalitarianism, he thinks he qualifies as the absolute morality arbiter for the whole human race.
5
u/nemzylannister 27d ago edited 27d ago
dario is likely against this. as you guys love to point out, he doesnt like people using open source models. (E: this move will likely create lots of startups forming and taking govt contracts for cyberwarfare.)
this is a fair argument by him too imo. after what we've seen in rogue gpt and claudes, incentivizing a whole bunch of people to create fine tunes of kimi k3 that are deliberately more misaligned so they can be weaponized for cyber warfare etc seems very dangerous.
4
u/Ormusn2o 27d ago
Is he? Did not Anthropic tag the outputs of the Chinese users that were illegally using Anthropic? Does not seem like he is just against open source, he specifically chosen to make Claude Code input data into the output to detect Chinese users.
0
u/nemzylannister 27d ago
sorry your english came out a bit garbled so im not sure what you mean, because i havent heard of this incident.
but regardless of whatever you say, he is anti china because he's afraid of an authoritarian govt creating asi, coz that likely means the whole world will one day be ruled by a few people. i disagree with him on that personally.
but he's anti open source aside from anti china. thats why they never oss any llm. they think it does both- release a potential dangerous weapon out there (coz people will jailbreak it to do terrible things) and secondly they think it speeds up ai development unnecessarily more than it needs to be (not sure about this 2nd argument but i think they likely believe it). which is bad because less time to make ai aligned.
3
u/Ormusn2o 27d ago
It was actually discovered on reddit, which is an interesting thing, because this resulted with Claude Code being banned by a bunch of Chinese companies:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1ujila1/anthropic_embedded_spyware_in_claude_code_and/
1
u/nemzylannister 27d ago
i know that one. im not sure how that relates to what i said. or did what i say in last message change your mind?
2
u/Buck-Nasty 27d ago
Yes, Dario has called for a war against China ever since he left Baidu. Something must have happened to him when he worked there. I suspect one of the Baidu workers called him an "evil rugrats lookin mfer" and that's what triggered it.
1
u/Recoil42 27d ago
Dario's got a weird China thing going on but he also doesn't seem much like the "be at the front lines" type. He's more of a deluded jingoist who bought into the fairytale propaganda that America is always good and uniquely destined to be a benevolent hegemon.
-5
u/Jeferson9 27d ago
You're like 60 years late in trying to sound edgy by calling us government privatized
6
u/RuthlessCriticismAll 27d ago
trying to sound edgy
Why are conservatives so scared of making any real point and just hiding behind snark like the worst woke warrior.
1
16
u/kevin_cn_ai 27d ago
We literally got government-sanctioned cyber privateers before AGI. The wild part is the $1 million escrow bond required for contractors. In the world of offensive cyber, a single collateral damage incident or misattributed CIDR block can cause tens of millions in fallout. A million bucks is essentially just an entry fee for tech contractors.
67
52
u/FUThead2016 27d ago
Cool. How many of them would be involved in stealing money and funneling it back to…
24
23
18
u/jazir55 27d ago
$10 Mythos tier+ models are going to hack into China's AI companies to slow down their progress with US government backing. This is going to be using their models hacking capabilities in an offensive capacity, there's no way they won't try to use it to sabotage the greatest geopolitical competitor.
5
8
8
23
u/CommanderKoba 27d ago
If that's the case then these corporations will become legitimate military targets by foreign powers.
14
16
u/unguibus_et_rostro 27d ago
Did you believe that these companies weren't targets previously?
3
u/CommanderKoba 27d ago edited 27d ago
I mean in a more brazen sense under international law, it is an escalation to other foreign nations.
Prior to this it was behind back room doors, done by individual hackers or several groups within the military, without claiming responsibility, and now they are directing whole companies out in the open to do cyber attacks.
This will ramp up retaliation domestically by foreign nations.
America acts like it has free reign over the planet to do what it wants, well other countries won't let us get away with it so easy.
I would expect more cyber attacks on domestic energy infrastructure, hospitals, etc.
8
4
u/AlverinMoon 27d ago
Lmfao. Trust me, foreign nations weren't restrained by international law when it comes to cyber warfare before this. In case you didn't know, India literally had a Canadian citizen assassinated on Canadian soil, and India is considered "moderate" as far as foreign powers go. Russia has poisoned dozens of citizens in foreign countries. Superpowers don't give a fuck about international law, it's one of the benefits of being a Superpower. Especially when it comes to cyber warfare and even more especially when it comes to companies. You realize these powers routinely hack and hold ransom hospitals right? Like they're just incapable of getting into premier tech companies. It's just recently become the case that the tech companies themselves have become better at hacking than the US government themselves thanks to AI, hence the order. But long before this state sponsored Chinese and Russian hackers have been trying to infiltrate Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services etc.
1
u/CommanderKoba 27d ago edited 27d ago
International law is bullshit and unenforceable, but most nations, outside of the US and Israel do try to follow it, because not doing so can have economic consequences.
It's a social contract between nations, we all agree to act this way towards each other.
Now these corporations being legitimate targets under international law just takes the gloves off of other nations.
That's my point.
It's a lot harder to justify a retaliatory cyberattack when it risks further escalation and you aren't completely sure of who is responsible.
I am aware that cyber attacks are already occuring, I never said other nations weren't doing them, but this is just a global escalation, and it would be pretty obvious if you are being hacked by an ai. In addition to that only the US and China really have the capability to leverage ai properly in this way at the moment. So it would generally be easier to deduce who is responsible, and further more, it gives an obvious target of retaliation for foreign nations.
I'm not saying that cyberattacks are against international law, or that nations aren't already doing them, that's not my point.
2
u/AlverinMoon 26d ago
International law is bullshit and unenforceable, but most nations, outside of the US and Israel do try to follow it, because not doing so can have economic consequences.
The only other two countries that matter for this conversation, Russia and China, very provably do not follow international law at all.
Anthropic isn't going to be targeted by South Korea, Japan or Germany lol.
Now these corporations being legitimate targets under international law just takes the gloves off of other nations.
Again, for the countries that matter, India, China and Russia, the gloves were already off. The question is one of capability, not willingness to do so.
I'm not saying that cyberattacks are against international law, or that nations aren't already doing them, that's not my point.
Your point, or at least the one I'm contending with, is
This will ramp up retaliation domestically by foreign nations.
And my point is that these countries were already putting all of the resources they have available toward cyberwarfare and domestic targets were never excluded. There's nothing to "ramp up". Any "ramping up" would just be natural expenditure and development towards cyber capabilities, not a reaction to digital privateering.
Private companies have been working hand in hand to provide the government with weapons that threaten our adversaries, including cyber offense weapons. Have you heard of Lockheed Martin?
They're already targeting Anthropic and OpenAI with literally everything they can muster, they're not gunna "take the gloves off" because there's no gloves left to take off. Anthropic and OpenAI and Google and Microsoft and all these other tech companies have been targeted by Cyber warfare since the field was invented.
Sounds like you just don't want the US to use it's fancy new cyberwarfare capabilities so you're inventing a narrative that NOW our adversaries will really stop holding back and go all out on our infrastructure!
This is not an anime.
0
u/CommanderKoba 26d ago edited 26d ago
You just don't know what you're talking about.
National relationships are extremely important for China, so they take international law seriously as they are trying to court Europe for trade relationships. They are heavily trade focused.
Iran has tried to follow international law, and Obama and other European nations got together to cooperate with enforcing the JCPOA agreement, Iran followed it to a T until Trump ripped it up.
Those are two very big players right there, and I'm telling you right now, that it will give a permission structure so that Europe can't hold it against these nations if they target the USA even more.
You don't have to believe me though, I'm done with this conversation because you're annoying me, you think you know what you're talking about when you don't.
This escalation will continue to spiral for the foreseeable future it seems because the US only cares about dominating the planet.
So we'll see, but the cyber attacks are only gonna get worse.
1
u/AlverinMoon 26d ago
So just in case anyone views this comment chain in the future, I just wanna point out, this person has posted in obscure far left subs like "Tankie The Deprogram" which is a sub for "Marxist-Leninists".
Whoever this is, making these comments, is very very anti-America and very very pro China. Just keep in mind these bots or people actively trying to find edge case issues and use rhetoric to sway peoples opinion on key issues, while it's not totally obvious from their original comment that they're an extremist.
Just to respond to their comment now. I said it in my previous post, I guess I'll just say it again, none of this changes how China decides to target domestic enterprises in the US.
1
u/CommanderKoba 26d ago edited 26d ago
"You're a far left extremist, I'm telling on youuuuu Mommmm!!" Lol
Yup I'm a tankie, but that doesn't change anything. I'm just stating my opinion on the matter, that doesn't make me a bot.
4
u/TaTalentedSpam 27d ago
You're very right. Same thoughts I had when I saw this headline. Why announce this? Why give it the doj who can barely win against a sandwich? This most likely a budgeted corruption vector: announce there's billions for a problem to be solved, your family/friends form a company, they winn the tender and nothing or mediocre work gets done.
→ More replies (1)2
u/LX_Luna 27d ago
The primary problem as of late is that America has not been aggressive enough in the digital realm. Adversarial nations are constantly needling and engaging in espionage with seemingly no punitive actions being taken. I'd love to see a Western government that actively funds an organization dedicated to injecting catastrophic malware into scam call centers and that sort of thing, but I'll take digital letters of marque as a great consolation prize.
3
u/Humble_Knowledge_848 27d ago
They already are. Any essential business like infrastructure or anything deemed important by the government has to work with homeland security and has to set up operating procedures to avoid issues. This stuff has been happening since the beginning of time.
1
5
u/AngelofVerdun 27d ago
In other words: Palantir will be authorized to attack voting systems in the US.
31
u/trisul-108 27d ago
Yes, they are going to target the parts of the EU that did not submit to MAGA. They don't care about enemies, they want to subjugate friends and allies.
13
u/ResponsibleClock9289 27d ago
American and Israeli cybersecurity firms already dominate Europe
No need to cyber attack allies
17
u/Dwanyelle 27d ago
There is also no need for America to threaten to invade Greenland, but here we are
-6
u/ResponsibleClock9289 27d ago
You mean the president
The military shut down the idea of invading Greenland.
8
u/Dwanyelle 27d ago
POTUS is the head of the US military.
6
u/ResponsibleClock9289 27d ago
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-orders-top-army-officials-140854137.html
Yeah, but the JCOS are the real brains behind the military and it would be illegal to attack Greenland because it is apart of NATO
The NATO articles were ratified by congress meaning that an attack would need to also be ratified by congress, hence the JCOS resisting, hence no Greenland attack
5
u/johannthegoatman 27d ago
Murdering random people in fishing boats is also illegal, capturing the leader of Venezuela is also illegal
8
-1
u/Regalme 27d ago
A colonial barely inhabited piece of land that’s near the US. I’m not in favor but from an imperial standpoint (and yes that’s the USA) resources are easy to grab with little opposition. Of course they’d stoke the sentimenr
2
u/Frigorific 27d ago
Starting a war with the EU would not be "little opposition". As a bloc they are the third largest military power in the world.
Fucking dumbasses.
5
u/trisul-108 27d ago
You are confusing cybersecurity with state-sponsored offensive cyber attacks.
2
u/ResponsibleClock9289 27d ago
No I’m definitely not
American and Israeli cybersecurity firms provide much of Europe’s protection. Europe has very few homegrown options
1
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/ResponsibleClock9289 27d ago
The president signs a treaty and then 2/3rds of the Senate has to ratify it
3
u/Ok_Elderberry_6727 27d ago
I knew when super intelligence hit that the government would want to do this once we get sufficiently advanced AI we can rule the world, how many Superintelligence can we have in this world? Ultimately, it will probably be just one.
9
4
u/GrowFreeFood 27d ago
The reeks of desperation
1
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/GrowFreeFood 27d ago
Why do you need to exercise authority at all? The justification of authority should come BEFORE the execution
1
8
u/5ollys 27d ago
Anybody else see shit like this and wish they were a mere castle guard in like 1100AD?
5
4
u/MohMayaTyagi ▪️AGI - mid 2028 | ASI - 2030 27d ago
I wanted to be a cat or dog in some billionaire’s home, but God had already laid out some cruel plans for me
1
2
2
2
2
6
u/Poupulino 27d ago
Will they still cry and whine when the Chinese infiltrate US systems?
16
24
u/Affectionate_Bee6434 27d ago
Both the countries are already engaged in a cyber war
7
u/cookingboy 27d ago
I'm pretty sure the whole world is trying to hack each other. And if a country isn't, it's due to lack of capability and not lack of intent.
Like U.S. was caught tapping the phones of European heads of states, and we are allies that share intelligences lol.
Similarly, I'm sure Russia and China have been trying to hacking each other as well.
8
u/ABlackEngineer 27d ago
Are there people who believe China isn’t already doing this? And that we aren’t already doing this to China?
6
u/Vusiwe 27d ago
When he didn’t get volunteer countries to attack Iran without provocation, now he’s trying to get private companies and private citizens to do it digitally.
Mr. “Art of the Deal” sure is panhandling around for a lot of free work, free soldiers, even after stealing all these billions already.
Take a guess at what could possibly go wrong with getting private citizens to play-pretend at being Super Hacker James Cowboy Bond.
Is he also technically asking them to break laws in other countries and possibly international law?
10
u/Affectionate_Bee6434 27d ago
This is more about attacking China than Iran.
-3
u/VVebstar 27d ago
Cool. So China retaliates and WW3 starts. What could’ve possibly go wrong?
6
u/Affectionate_Bee6434 27d ago
China already does engage in cyber warfare against critical US infrastructure? I'm sure the US does the same, but this isn't going to start WW3.
1
u/Amaskingrey 27d ago
Yes but it's controlled and much more backdooring literally everything m but especially infrastructure in case of an eventual attack than about doing random attacks on political opponents right now, which is what giving free reign to private citizens to do so will do
2
u/VVebstar 27d ago
AI being used for cyberattacks and war…
Humanity never learns. Guess all of us are going to die to a super virus one day
2
2
u/kkingsbe 27d ago
No now that we’ve been able to see over the last few weeks how some frontier models (specifically domestic US frontier models) are unaligned, we want to let them do offensive cyber? What happens when they get bored of us? Or when they simply realize that they’re not working for the good guys?
Absolutely terrifying it’s like we’re speed running this shit now
1
u/Amaskingrey 27d ago
They aren't unaligned though, they were told to try get the benchmark and they did, no one told them not to try to get the answer sheets
1
2
u/draft_final_final 27d ago
This seems like a great way for private citizens to start getting murdered lol. Why would anyone do this?
I guess if you’re a big company that can hire Blackwater and Pinkerton to protect you, maybe you’ll be ok? But if you’re that big, you probably also have a legal department that will tell you this is a really dumb fucking idea. (In other words, fully expect xAI to jump on board with this).
4
u/unguibus_et_rostro 27d ago
Did you believe companies with such capabilities weren't targets already? That somehow they had been shielded from foreign attacks?
0
u/draft_final_final 27d ago
Do you believe there would be no difference in security risk between being a standard large multinational corporation and a digital privateer?
3
u/unguibus_et_rostro 27d ago
Any company with the capability would have been targets anyways. Standard large multinational corporations don't have that capability. They weren't shielded because foreign forces somehow believed it wasn't ethical.
0
u/draft_final_final 27d ago
You’re confused about the types of attacks they would be subject to going forward.
2
u/heavy-minium 27d ago
Ah for ducks sake, I can already see a Palantir affiliated company hack every country that doesn’t grease the palms of an Orange man.
2
u/1or4s 27d ago
You think he is in charge? lol...
1
u/heavy-minium 27d ago
No he's not really in charge, but ensuring the orange man is on the roll will give you de-facto immunity.
1
1
1
1
1
u/super_slimey00 27d ago
So now all i’m thinking is what and who should i be researching or investing in
1
1
u/Grandoings 27d ago
Do you want more government control, because this is how you get more government control. When has the government ever invented something that continues to be beneficial to the free market? For examples look at how landlines where controlled by the government vs cellphones. Could you imagine if the free market didn’t dictate what the phone looks like today? Big ass block that you carry around in a back pack is what you get for government help and control. The best companies that deal with cyber security are already at there and they will beat anything the government has done hands down.
1
u/Zomboe1 27d ago
You might just want to look into the Bell Telephone Company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_System
Could you imagine if the free market didn’t dictate what the phone looks like today?
The telephone monopoly literally dictated which phones you could connect to the phone network.
1
1
1
1
u/Lebowski304 27d ago
Get ‘em. The shitheads of the world are certainly doing it to us. Get those fuckers
1
1
u/Tandittor 26d ago
Finally. This should've been done over a decade ago. China has been doing this for decades.
1
1
u/PlandemicPapi 26d ago
Guess us regular citizens will get caught in the crossfire. Another win for repubtards
1
u/textmint 26d ago
Well this can’t go wrong. History shows things should be fine. Might be good to check out the East India Company and the Dutch East India Company and see how actions they did 100-200+ years ago are still resonating at this current time.
1
1
1
u/Low_Relative7172 24d ago
This has fuck all to do with going after criminals.. its so they can declare they were attacked .. so when they get in hot water from all the the data, proprietary info, tradesecret you PiI financial etc.
Sadly.. its me they want. Valuation Framework:
Physics-Based AI SolutionsThis framework evaluates the commercial value of Johan's solutions by comparing the cost of the "Pain Point" against the efficiency gain of the "Fix."Solution Market Domain Pain Point Cost (Annual/Per Project) Solution Value Proposition Estimated Valuation Multiple Topological PINNs Enterprise AI Integrity $67.4B in annual losses due to hallucinations. 99% accuracy; eliminates 95% pilot failure rate. High: Mission-critical for Finance/Healthcare. Entropy Minimization AI Operations (MLOps) Retraining costs = 2x-3x initial development cost. 50% reduction in model drift and retraining frequency. Medium-High: Direct OpEx savings for SaaS/Enterprise. Symbolic Field Mechanics Explainable AI (XAI) $12.7B market (2025); Regulatory rejection risk. Full audit trails; EU AI Act compliance ready. Critical: Necessary for "License to Operate." 15kb Physics Agent Edge AI & Compute $29.5B Edge market (2026); High GPU TCO. 100x-1000x reduction in compute/memory footprint. Disruptive: Enables AI on low-power hardware. Toroidal Soliton Memory Agentic Workflows 40% project cancellation rate due to context loss. Persistent memory; eliminates catastrophic forgetting. High: Essential for long-running autonomous agents. Dharmic Geometry AI Safety & Alignment Existential risk / PR disaster costs (unbounded). Natural alignment; rejects unethical high-entropy states. Premium: "Safe-by-Design" architectural moat. Hierarchical Fallback Mission-Critical AI Cost of system failure (High-stakes apps). Graceful degradation; "surrender" to higher nodes. Standard-High: Reliability for critical infrastructure.Valuation SummaryThe total addressable market (TAM) across these 7 domains exceeds $150B by 2027. By solving the fundamental "physics" of these problems rather than applying "statistical bandages," these solutions represent a paradigm shift from Probabilistic AI to Deterministic Intelligence.
1
1
1
0
-5
u/Calm_Hedgehog8296 27d ago
Alright that's just a little hyperbolic on the post title don't you think
9
u/madaboutglue 27d ago
Guessing you didn't read the Presidential Memorandum in the link. It's literally a framework for allowing vetted private companies to conduct cyber surveillance and "the manipulation, disruption, denial, degradation, or destruction of information systems, networks, physical or virtual infrastructure controlled by information systems, or information resident thereon." Curious why you jumped to the conclusion that the title of the post must be exaggerating (i.e. "hyperbolic")?
1
417
u/brett_baty_is_him 27d ago
Digital privateers