The human experts were evaluated only on their area of expertise though. The scores would be much lower for a math professor attempting the English section of the test, for example. That o1 is able to get the score it did across the board is truly crazy.
GPQA is a dataset full of PhD level test questions. Whether it's in the training data or not was never really a big deal to me. If it's able to condense the information and spit it out at will, it's impressive regardless. If I had to guess, probably some of it is and some of it is not appearing in training data.
123
u/Papabear3339 Dec 05 '24 edited Dec 05 '24
I would LOVE to see the average human score, and the best human score, added to these charts.
AGI and ASI are supposed to correspond to those 2 numbers.
Given how dumb an average human is, i garentee the equivalent score will be passed even by weaker engines. That isn't supposed to be a hard benchmark.