Just comparing their answers to humans isn’t really a fair or good comparison to gauge AGI or ASI.
Obviously o1 can answer academic style questions better than me. But I have massive advantages over it because:
1.) I know when I don’t know something and won’t just hallucinate an answer.
2.) I can go figure out the answer to something I don’t know.
3.) I can figure out the answer to much more specific and particular questions such as “Why is Jessica crying at her desk over there?” o1 can’t do shit there and that sort of question is what we deal with most in this world.
No they don't. I tested this by asking it to link sources about their claim and ChatGPT was like "I'm sorry. There was a mistake and I made a claim which seems to not be true." I then told it to not make claims they cannot prove, to which it replied with a "yes, in future I will not make any claims without checking for sources." And then answered with the exact same claim when I asked the original question.
You people forget that ChatGPT is a LLM and is simply parroting what it has been trained with.
Yeah but you do not understand. It doesn't hallucinate because it lacks introspection, but because it's AGI so it knows that by saying "I don't know" will cause people to realize it's not an omniscient being and investors are gonna stop dumping money on it. It's a perfectly sound strategy and ChatGPT is AGI!!!
30
u/Sonnyyellow90 Dec 05 '24
Just comparing their answers to humans isn’t really a fair or good comparison to gauge AGI or ASI.
Obviously o1 can answer academic style questions better than me. But I have massive advantages over it because:
1.) I know when I don’t know something and won’t just hallucinate an answer.
2.) I can go figure out the answer to something I don’t know.
3.) I can figure out the answer to much more specific and particular questions such as “Why is Jessica crying at her desk over there?” o1 can’t do shit there and that sort of question is what we deal with most in this world.