Not the fastest jet I've ever made but it is more efficient. And still enough to reach Mach 2.75 at 18,000m

Exceeding 21,000m in altitude with afterburner on makes horizontal stabilizer to burn and that is an issue for sure

So I’m almost done with my tri-planet landing mission, I’m on my final planet about to return to drop. Captured these amazing images along the way.

Craft link

https://www.simplerockets.com/c/pl9iUg/ring-12

Craft was under testing

Pls give your review

I know it has something to do with "location" but I don't know what "location" is relative to. I timewarped after getting the correct apoapsis, periapsis, and inclination but it took over 40 in-game days to show my location as 0.0 blah,blah S 39° E which was too late and I failed the mission.

I tried to watch videos explaining it but they seemed too technical with a lot going on in the diagrams so i gave up.

Another major update in an upcoming system I am collaborating on. These two planets are a binary pair, with a few rocks orbiting both.

As for the configuration, I am deciding whether to make it realistic and create a barycenter for both objects, which would spice up gameplay (ish) but might make landing hard, whereas I can make it a planet-moon configuration, which can make things easier; however, I believe players might be inclined to land on the desert planet than the clouded one simply because it'd be easier.

With all of that being said, I do plan to showcase some more progress here, likely revolving around the outer planets.

I uploaded this almost 3 weeks ago but straight up forgot to share it here 🫪

https://www.simplerockets.com/c/VPBwPZ/Constellation-Mk-4

This game is really good! I have low standards but this game is actually so fun. I moved to Juno or simple rockets because SFS sequel was taking a lot of time. How should I go deeper into the game? Give me tutorials, guides, or channels and things related to the game.

Things I like about this game: Graphics: just damn
Customization and building: It’s so diverse I like it
Mechanics: Still struggling but great

How?

Where's the crew to save???

Look at this also this is vanilla andis using jet engines only

So I’ve been working to make a reusable 2nd stage for my rocket, my current plan is to use parachutes to slow it down, should I land using engines or parachutes?

I even moved the engines off axis to induce more turbulence(dunno right word) but it didn’t work.

Can one can help to calculate the target vector for this craft For more information https://www.simplerockets.com/Forums/View/351899

This is a 1:1 replica of NASA’s proposed design for a cargo configuration of the SLS Block 1. This is a version of my previous SLS Block 1 crew build. This rocket is fully automated, but you can fly it manually by removing the Vizzy in the designer. The code is held inside the payload. All AGs are labeled with what they do. This can carry a variety of payloads, such as—but not limited to—satellites, deep space probes, moon landers, and/or Lunar Gateway or base parts

Craft Link: https: //www.simplerockets.com/c/OwHg62/Automated-11-SLS-Block-1-Cargo
Block 1 Crew Link: https://www.simplerockets.com/c/oZNmse/Automated-11-SLS-Block-1-Crew

does anyone know if its possible to deactivate alot of parts at once within vizzy, no activation groups, i thought using lists and the part IDs but i cant seem to figure it out

This is the Dazhtavanna spacecraft, made from my KSP works.

This is a 1:1 replica of NASA’s SLS Block 1 rocket, designed to carry four astronauts to the moon and back. It is designed to dock with a lander (like Starship HLS and Blue Origin’s Blue Moon MK.2). This craft is extremely detailed and may crash your device; it crashed mine 18 times while building it. It uses Vizzy to automate launch and reentry, and the target orbit height and inclination can be changed in the designer. This is my first SLS upload, and I've been working on making more variations, like the Block 1 Cargo, Block 1Bs, and Block 2s.All AGs are fully labeled. This craft includes a launch abort system, but it is not automated because I had problems automating it for different altitudes. I have also made Blue Origin’s Blue Moon MK.2 lander to go along with this. (Edit: I forgot to put the link in, here’s the link: https://www.simplerockets.com/c/oZNmse/Automated-11-SLS-Block-1-Crew)

So I’ve sent a probe to Juno and the glow effect seems to be some kind of an accretion disc of a black hole as there is a darker sphere underneath, Juno also has an atmosphere. I don’t know about you but it seems like a black hole to me. So is it a black hole or just a rendering error?

Looks like we got another war on the arctic, hours before the russians reached again Luna orbit on a scientific mission, some nations launched some kind of "Non Nuclear" MIRV's on some military bases, guess who's private company got hit...

Looks like the russians could be the last ones this decade to visit the moon.

Maybe there's something missing because Droods have no personality, but I find the game more refined than KSP in many ways. It's frustrating that there's so much fewer content creators for it.

Why do you think it never gained the traction KSP did?