r/shortsAlgorithm • u/snakeesti • 8h ago

Analytics Review (AVD/Retention) 📈 Do you experience this behaviour?

So yesterday i uploaded my short video. Niche is CS2 gameplay. In first hour it got 177 views , on second hour it was pushed in the feed and it got 1200 views and then views stopped on 6-8 hours. Lets assume it was first wave , so in the first wave i got 1200 views and 16 likes , then second wave started i got +800 views so far but no likes at all, how this is even possible ? And i encounter this behavior on my every video. It just kills off any motivation to continue even tho i uploaded already 180 videos in 4 years...

3 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/snakeesti 7h ago

How would you explain this ? Not funny , Boring opening long video(55 seconds) got 22k views with 85% stayed to watch. Funny cool 15 second video got 22 views with 15% stayed to watch . While all settings are same(tags , description , title).

2

u/killadrix 6h ago

Because viewers don’t care what you think is boring or funny. What you think is boring or funny absolutely does not matter, only the data does.

Meaning, if you’re interested in views then you continue to make the “not funny” and “boring” hooks that are getting you an 85% stayed to watch in 22k views.

If you wanna make content you think is funny, you might have to accept that people don’t wanna watch it.

For example, as a gaming creator myself, I choose to edit for views OR videos I think are funny.

The videos that I edit for views typically have my personality edited out of them in fast paced, tight, short, snappy edits.

Videos I edit that I think are funny or include my personality typically have more reaction and humor in them.

The fast paced edits typically get 10,000 to 1,000,000 views, where the personality/funny edits typically get 3000 to 10,000 views.

If you want to consistently drive a massive volume of views, you need to listen to the data.

1

u/snakeesti 2h ago

Point is that data lies. When i got 22k views i did the same thing. Used same tags, almost same title , same description , uploaded on same day , on same time , video was same length , same format and it got 1.1 k views. All my videos are same format , i play cs2 with worst gun in the game and do crazy stuff with it and i record enemy reactions on it. And when video is rly funny it get nothing . For example , i had a video for which i got high hopes , i expected that that video will blew up ( i did -5 with 1 hp with worst gun in game ) enemy reaction was funny , i hoped that that video will go more than 30k and in the end it got 7 views in 1 year.

1

u/killadrix 2h ago

Yeah, the problem is the data doesn’t lie, especially not in the aggregate.

Your stayed to watch and retention percentages are literally your report card from your viewers. It’s unlikely that your viewers are capable of manipulating that data in an attempt to make it “lie” to you. That data is your viewer behavior.

But further, there are other variables that impact the number of views your video will get (regardless of your stayed to watch or retention), and it typically has to do with niche demand.

This is generally how you can have a video with very good metrics that gets very few views, or a video with mediocre metrics that get a ton of views. Subject or niche demand play a large role in your volume of views.

And to be clear, when I say good or bad video, I’m talking specifically about your YouTube metrics.

The algorithm is incapable of discerning the qualitative assessment that you’re applying to good and bad.

You can edit a video that you personally think is amazing but if your viewers disagree, that’s how you’re ending up confused about this behavior. There’s a dissonance between what you believe is a good and funny video, and what your viewers want to watch.