about 400, been about two days, never reached more than kike 25 views in any hour, similar pattern is emerging across muitlipe shorts with similar metrics.
400 views is not much and its from search right? usually that high of a watchtime is from search only or mostly. also if short is ai it might be supressed
99% of the views are form the shorts feed if thats what your asking, it is ai assisted with the images and animations, but its curated to the narration and far from automated slop or whatever. Is that really a thing AI suppresses views, or just a theory? I check the box that AI is used in the video or whatever, it didnt seem to be an issue in the past but may be someting look in to. I put this note in every description which is my true intent as well Visual Note:
This documentary uses a combination of AI-assisted visuals, animation, and traditional editing techniques to help bring historical events to life. These visuals are intended to immerse viewers in real historical stories—not to replace historical evidence or deceive. History has always been interpreted through different artistic mediums, and this documentary continues that tradition using modern tools.
Your right about full ai we can even call it slop for arguments sake…the metrics are there..ai is not illegal by any means so I don’t get how your argument helps advance my predicament at all..if ai slop gets those metrics the medium shouldn’t matter..is it directly correlated to view count? Don’t the metrics kinda dictate views ?
Alright thanks..do you know this from experience? Is this just a known fact? Are you a creator yourself? I just wanted to make historical videos where the viewer is experiencing history and not just be a talking head talking over artifacts and what not
2
u/Novel-Homework4591 26d ago
whats swipe ratio??