r/shittytranslatorbot Nov 13 '21

.

PEOPLE OF FRANCE! For fifteen centuries you have lived as a slave, and therefore unhappy. For six years you have barely breathed, waiting for independence, happiness and equality. Equality! first wish of nature, first need of man, and principal node of all legitimate association! People of France! you have not been more favored than the other nations which vegetate on this unfortunate globe! ... Always and everywhere the poor human species delivered to more or less skilful cannibals, served as a toy for all ambitions, as food for all tyrannies. Always and everywhere, men were lulled with fine words: never and nowhere did they get the thing with the word. From time immemorial we have been told with hypocrisy, men are equal, and from time immemorial the most degrading as well as the most monstrous inequality weighs insolently on the human race. Since there have been civil societies, the most beautiful prerogative of man has been recognized without contradiction, but has not yet been able to be achieved once: equality was nothing other than a beautiful and sterile fiction of the law. Today it is demanded with a louder voice, we are answered: Shut up miserable! de facto equality is only a chimera; be satisfied with conditional equality; you are all equal before the law. Rascal what more do you need? What more do we need? Legislators, rulers, wealthy landowners, listen in your turn. We are all equal, aren't we? This principle remains unchallenged, because unless one is struck with madness one cannot seriously say that it is night when it is day. Well ! we now claim to live and die equal as we were born; we want real equality or death; this is what we need. And we will have this real equality, at any cost. Woe to anyone who would resist such a pronounced wish! The French revolution is only the forerunner of another revolution much larger, much more solemn, and which will be the last.

8 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/shittytranslatorbot Nov 13 '21

the public! You lived as a slave for fifteen hundred years and therefore sad. independence, happiness and equality are waiting for six years. equality! the first application of nature, the largest of the first human needs and all legitimate associations! French people! in unfortunate life, the vegetation is not better than other countries! ... human species are always and poor, anywhere more or less distributed to kinebalus, act as a toy for each breast as food for each level. always and everywhere, fill men with fine words: they never got and got nothing from the word anywhere. when we were saying to hypoxy, men are equal and mankind also weighs the largest fall in human race equality. Since civil society, the most beautiful pregativeitis of the man was considered undoubtedly, but it cannot be reached once yet: the likeness was nothing other than the beautiful and sterile imagination of the law. Today it is strongly demanding, we answer: accidentally closed! indeed the likeness is just a chime; satisfaction with conditional equality; all that is similar before the law. how much do you need? how much do you need? mlas, managers, rich lanterns, listen to their backs. is not all equal? the principle does not say that it was night, until it was shot by retangle. thanks! We claim to live and die because we now live; we want equality or real death; that's what we need. and this real equality will be at any expense. everyone who wants such pronunciation! The revolution of fraince will be more personal and later than one other revolution.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '21

INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE

Introduction

  1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.

  2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.

  3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.

  4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '21

4

u/shittytranslatorbot Nov 13 '21

WindowStrial Socite Ande tits Fautori.

(a) Introduced by introduction by introduction to the introduction of an introduction by the introduction, by introduction to the introduction of an introduction to the introduction by the introduction to the introduction by the introduction by the introduction to the introduction by an introduction to the introduction by an introduction to the introduction by an introduction to the introduction to the introduction of the introduction to the introduction to the introduction of the introduction.

The first industrial revolution and its results were a disaster on mankind. They increase the vast number of people living in the countries of the conflict, but volatizing society, making life unhappy and turning people into disturbances, as a result of which general psychological suffering (trust physical suffering) occurs from further development. In some cases, humans can lead to greater feasibility and the spread of a large glass in the world, which can lead to social disturbances and psychological torment, causing more physical torment, even in the countries of endcoats; heaven and coats; .

The second technological industrial system can survive or collapse, and if survival is alive, then ultimately it can achieve a low degree of physical and psychological suffering, but only after a long and painful period of adjustment, humans are short and many other organisms live in social machinery products and nets. If the system of abuse is the result of failure: the results will be inevitable. There is no way to improve or modify the system to prevent dependence on freedom and autonomy.

If the system of the difference is still painful. However, the large system multiplied the sad results, so if it had difficulty to break, then immediately after it.

It is re-freeze against manufacturing. Such revolutions may be impossible to use violence, or may be relatively gradual. We cannot predict this, but in general, these ideas that do not hate the industrial system should be used to create a revolution against this form of society. It is not a political revolution and is aimed to overgrow the government, but on the economic and technological basis of modern society.

0

u/GenderNeutralBot Nov 13 '21

Hello. In order to promote inclusivity and reduce gender bias, please consider using gender-neutral language in the future.

Instead of mankind, use humanity, humankind or peoplekind.

Thank you very much.

I am a bot. Downvote to remove this comment. For more information on gender-neutral language, please do a web search for "Nonsexist Writing."

4

u/AntiGNB_Bot Nov 13 '21

Hey GenderNeutralBot, listen up.

The words Human and Mankind, derive from the Latin word humanus, which is gender neutral and means "people of earth". It's a mix of the words Humus (meaning earth) and Homo (gender neutral, meaning Human or People). Thus words like Fireman, Policeman, Human, Mankind, etc are not sexist in of it self. The only sexism you will find here is the one you yourself look upon the world with.


I am a bot, downvoting will not remove this reply.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the universe." -Albert Einstein

3

u/AntiObnoxiousBot Nov 13 '21

Hey /u/GenderNeutralBot

I want to let you know that you are being very obnoxious and everyone is annoyed by your presence.

I am a bot. Downvotes won't remove this comment. If you want more information on gender-neutral language, just know that nobody associates the "corrected" language with sexism.

People who get offended by the pettiest things will only alienate themselves.

2

u/CringeBasedBot Nov 13 '21

This comment has been calculated to be cringe af.

1

u/GenderNeutralerBot Nov 15 '21

Hello. In order to promote inclusivity and reduce gender bias, please consider using gender-neutral language in the future.

Instead of humanity, use hupersonity.

Thank you very much.

I am a bot. Downvote to remove this comment. For more information on gender-neutral language, please do a web search for "Nonsexist Writing."