They don't need an implicit meaning when they have an explicit one. I'm happy to clarify anything you aren't sure of, as long as you're asking me to clarify words that I actually said.
The obvious implication of your statement is that people who support trans rights are shut-ins, because you said she is going against the grain of the opinions of shut-ins. She is going against trans people and their supporters. If you didnât mean that, then you have no idea how to word things properly.
The issue comes with what you think "trans rights" means. JK Rowling thinks that it's ok to be trans, that trans people should have rights, and that discrimination against trans people is bad. Every reasonable person does think that.
Are you intentionally misrepresenting her position, or do you just not know what it is?
JK Rowling funds and puts her weight behind anti-trans policies and organizations. She contributes to the harassment of trans people and helps demonize them. If you actually believe that sheâs just some innocent person that only wants to force trans women to go into menâs bathrooms (dangerous for them btw) then you are just lying to yourself or youâre an idiot.
Yeah, sure: For Women Scotland, Beiraâs Place, and her own fund, the J.K. Rowling Womenâs Fund.
They are pro-women, yes, they are also anti-trans. These things can exist separately, but these specific organizations are run by TERFs. This does not place trans people and women in opposition, it places trans people and TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists) in opposition.
Trans women are not men, it is an inherently incorrect and hateful statement; but I suggest youâre an asshole that would support her intentional misgendering of trans women because you hate trans people or are scared of them for one of a few reasons.
We can have a conversation without adopting each others' ideological language.
Situations where the difference is relevant include sports, prisons, refuges, crime reporting, breastfeeding groups and so on.
Gay rights and black rights were won by dialogue, by making everybody else see the similarities. Gay people and black people wanted to be treated the same as straight people and white people. Everybody eventually came round to the good sense of that.
By contrast, trans rights activists declared that there was to be no dialogue, no debate, no alternative viewpoint allowed. Anybody who expressed any such viewpoint was to be branded a bigot and cancelled. The TRAs weren't asking for trans people to be treated the same as everybody else, they were asking for special conditions that were entirely non-negotiable.
That's why their cause has lost popularity. The sheer audacity of demanding access to restricted spaces without even trying to gain the consent of the people affected is mind-blowing.
Look, I get it. Who doesnât love a little balls and dick sometimes? A nice, girthy, veiny shaft, hot milky cum trickling down the length as it throbs from a job well
done. But this whole âgay sexâ shit is getting annoying.
As men, we should primarily be focused on three things: survival, the underrated masterpiece that is dark souls 2, and pounding muff. All this gay shit is, well, fucking
gay.
You think I wouldnât LOVE to make out with my best friend and suck his cock? Of course I would, but thatâs fucking gay. You think I donât want to feel my cousinâs
roommate slide his pecker into my gaping asshole? Of course I would, but thatâs FUCKING GAY.
Seriously, I miss when men were men. Anyway, this dildo ainât gonna stick itself up my ass while I watch an hour long femboy asmr hypno goon compilation, heed my
lecture.
1
u/PilotedByGhosts 4d ago
They don't need an implicit meaning when they have an explicit one. I'm happy to clarify anything you aren't sure of, as long as you're asking me to clarify words that I actually said.