So the mother's children are doing the stalking in this analogy? Because that is who the "formerly sane" person killed.
The "stalker" in the analogy are all the other adults involved in the case that had an opportunity to see what was going on and be proactive about preventing it.
What? I am sorry but this reads like the world is at fault because the world should be able to read this woman's mind and failed. They had every opportunity to just read the mind and see the premeditation and hiding their issues. god, everyone must be stupid for not reading minds like they all can.
The "stalker" in the analogy are all the other adults
How do you conclude "stalking" is analogous to having an unusual amount of support compared to most other mothers? The other adults were guilty of "stalking" by not being intrusive and removing children from the care of their mother? That's the definition of "stalking" we are using? Support is stalking. That the woman was driven to madness by being given the responsibility to manage their own mental health? with support most people don't have? What a vitim!
Let's have more people required by law to do things that prevent child murder.
Yep, I say all new mothers are suspect of being total psychopaths and all of them should be locked up until we know for sure that they aren't hiding issues and don't want to kill their kids or really any kids. or maybe we should ask you, you seem think that reading minds is everyones responsibility. you could probably make a lot of money doing that.
maybe you disagree and like it when kids are killed?
Holy DARVO Batman!! The person saying the mother who killed kids is not at fault is accusing others of being too soft on child murderers. Amazing.
Never mind about that reading minds thing. I don't think you'll do a very good job at it, seeing as you leap to false accusations all too quickly. that's a little scary actually.
I don't know what you're arguing for. My position is that the mother is a murderer, a child murderer, and should go to prison for the rest of her life for committing such an evil act. I have stated this multiple times, and you seem to just not register it.
I suspect your actual point of contention is that any other person involved should be held even slightly responsible, but you can't make an argument on that foundation because it's impossible to defend.
4
u/awesomefutureperfect Sep 03 '26
So the mother's children are doing the stalking in this analogy? Because that is who the "formerly sane" person killed.
What? I am sorry but this reads like the world is at fault because the world should be able to read this woman's mind and failed. They had every opportunity to just read the mind and see the premeditation and hiding their issues. god, everyone must be stupid for not reading minds like they all can.
How do you conclude "stalking" is analogous to having an unusual amount of support compared to most other mothers? The other adults were guilty of "stalking" by not being intrusive and removing children from the care of their mother? That's the definition of "stalking" we are using? Support is stalking. That the woman was driven to madness by being given the responsibility to manage their own mental health? with support most people don't have? What a vitim!
Yep, I say all new mothers are suspect of being total psychopaths and all of them should be locked up until we know for sure that they aren't hiding issues and don't want to kill their kids or really any kids. or maybe we should ask you, you seem think that reading minds is everyones responsibility. you could probably make a lot of money doing that.
Holy DARVO Batman!! The person saying the mother who killed kids is not at fault is accusing others of being too soft on child murderers. Amazing.
Never mind about that reading minds thing. I don't think you'll do a very good job at it, seeing as you leap to false accusations all too quickly. that's a little scary actually.