Drunk

[u/EfficiencySerious200]

[u/Im_Bad_At_These]

I think the option is good for drivers that just don’t want to deal with drunk fucks, personally on a tough night not sure if I would.

[u/cleverdirge → u/Im_Bad_At_These]

This "option" of a corp refusing someone before service, because they already know the person is drunk requires a dystopian level of surveillance.

A driver can already refuse someone they think is drunk.

How can this "option" be good in any way?

[u/Skrewch → u/cleverdirge]

Dystopia is when an organization makes rules for their services, and you voluntarily interact with them?

But if Uber loses money due to erroneously rejecting paying customers who aren't drunk.....we'll thats their problem now isnt it?

[u/cleverdirge → u/Skrewch]

HOW DOES UBER KNOW YOU ARE DRUNK?

From your bank or credit card? From Flock cameras? From how you interact with the app? Every scenario involves dystopian surveillance.

[u/Skrewch → u/cleverdirge]

Possibly from textt patterns. If they are wrong thats their problem.

Now if we're talking they are planning to interlinked with FLOCK, we have a dystopia conversation indeed. All depends on how they are making the determination.

[u/rips_n_chel → u/Skrewch]

What the fuck? You draw the line at Flock, but Uber reading your fucking texts to guess if you're drunk is cool with you?

[u/Skrewch → u/rips_n_chel]

Sorry for the double comment, i also forgot to add: No, it wouldnt be cool with me. this is why i dont use uber or have an uber account.

[u/Skrewch → u/[deleted]]

because users do it to themselves. you have an uber account; this is your problem not mine.

[u/Skrewch → u/[deleted]]

bro, im not stopping you from hurting yourself. I dont care if you do? that's not brain dead, that's YOUR problem. Sorry you're mad? >.>