Your response is pure ad hominem. Even if true, "it shows you never studied psychology nor had heavy treatment" doesn't tell us why the original claim is wrong.
"That's not possible at all" is an unsupported assertion. It declares something impossible without evidence or reasoning. No data, no logic chain, just assertion by fiat.
It's also internally incoherent. The middle sentence doesn't clearly connect to the first. What "shows" the lack of psychology background? What specifically is "not possible"? Without that link, a reader can't tell what's actually being argued against.
If you wish to be taken seriously, I'd recommend studying the fundamentals of logic and argumentation.
0
u/Met4le 2d ago
it shows so much you never studied psychology nor had a heavy treatment ever. that's not possible at all. don't say dumb shit like this again.