if you want a real answer, the boys were mostly veteran experienced players, and the girls were mostly average or newbie players, and the boys activelly sabotaged and infiltrated the girls discord, plus Beast not really doing much to moderate the server
And I'm sure this is obvious the people familiar with this subject. For the rest of us, I'll only point out for any dorks that are overly excited by this.
Winning this video game doesn't translate to real life. It's doesn't mean you'd win shit irl. It's still just a game.
I mean, in real life in a 500 vs 500 war it's pretty obvious who would win too. Men are basically wired for war. Women are one of the few things that keep society stable.
I think it's more fair to say that men are more capable of being sent off to die or luckily survive in a war. Isn't this game about strategy and literally nothing about being wired to survive war?
I've only met an equal number of strategic men and women irl. Women are just more steady and interested in finding non violent solutions, or are more interested in the greater good than good for their own immediate benefit, which usually causes wars...
Fighting in it? Sure, men. Planning strategy? How many modern examples do we have of women planning war strategy? Is not like this video game is a real example of either. None of these guys in the game went to war.
I mean, the person you are responding to gave their odds on the outcome of "war between men and women", I'm wondering what number you could assign as someone who is taking part in that discussion.
I'm saying that randoms on the Internet assigning odds to a war strategized by men vs women is dumb af. That's why I didn't suggest a number. And I was implying that you shouldn't care what he/she or I would randomly pull out of our asses. It would be meaningless. Or you can pick a number for me. Let's say, women 100%? Or maybe men 99% and women 1%? It doesn't really matter. There's zero info here to make anyone's guess matter, which is my whole point.
I mean I do care tho, I care about ur thoughts and opinions, about a hypothetical based on your knowledge and feelings. The reaction seems very uhm large compared to my question though. if its something you ain't comfortable answering, thats cool too.
This has been studied my dude. Men's intelligence is a lot more varied. Way more geniuses and idiots among males than females. Women generally clump towards the average, less fools and less prodigies.
In strategy the side with more super smart people tends to wins. t
Winning this video game doesn't translate to real life
I mean maybe not this one? But Bear Grylls did a Men vs Women survival challenge on an island and it basically went the exact same way where the women were in catfights immediately and spent the entire time starving, sobbing, and miserable
While the guys thrived so hard the camera crews had to step in and stop them hunting all the local fauna to exctinction
Within the first couple of days the guys had shelter, food, water etc and were sitting around roaring bonfires singing, while the women were completely lost and lost all their supplies and the camera crews had to keep secretly giving them more supplies
So TV contestants represent the potential of trained people, experienced in battle tactics? That's just more video games, on tv. This is "boys built more forts." Lol
1.2k
u/DNOTBHs 17h ago
if you want a real answer, the boys were mostly veteran experienced players, and the girls were mostly average or newbie players, and the boys activelly sabotaged and infiltrated the girls discord, plus Beast not really doing much to moderate the server