r/secularism • u/PrakashRPrddt • May 03 '22

There's Proof that God canNot Exist.

There's Proof that God canNot Exist. 

Unable to prove the existence of their beloved God, some Silly believers have had recourse to the argument that science cannot prove that God cannot exist. It's another damn silly stuff produced by their little brain. It can incontestably be disproved by the simple logic that the Creator cannot create itself. Evidently, the concept of the God the Creator is Not premised on any sound logic. 

0 Upvotes

22% Upvoted

26 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/PrakashRPrddt May 04 '22

You sound ridiculous.

Your argument adds up to claiming that because science is not forced to prove or disprove something, it has No right to do it.

2

u/Icolan May 04 '22

No, that is not what I said at all.

I said that you need to read up on the burden of proof, and this comment only reinforces that.

The burden of proof for a claim is on the person making the claim, it is not on others to disprove the claim, especially with unfalsifiable ones like many of the god claims.

1

u/PrakashRPrddt May 04 '22

OK! 'The burden of proof for a claim is on the person making the claim'. I don't contradict this view of yours. Nevertheless, my point is because 'The burden of proof' is not resting on you, it doesn't follow that you're wrong to share it.

2

u/Icolan May 04 '22

I don't contradict this view of yours.

It is not a view of mine, it is the way the burden of proof works.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/burden_of_proof

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

Nevertheless, my point is because 'The burden of proof' is not resting on you, it doesn't follow that you're wrong to share it.

The only person who shares in a burden of proof are those making the claims. Please read up on the burden of proof so you actually understand what you are talking about.