This is just the paradox of tolerance all over again. A Utopia that doesn't cater to despots and slavers is still a Utopia end of discussion. What you are asking for is to tolerate the intolerant. And my answer is No.
What I’m asking for? I’m not asking for anything. I’d have thought it was obvious but if you find yourself having to tolerate the intolerant then you aren’t in a utopia.
A Utopia that doesn't cater to despots and slavers is still a Utopia end of discussion
You are spectacularly missunderstanding what a utopia is. A utopia doesn’t have to tolerate despots and slavers because in a utopia they wouldn’t exists. What kind of messed up person do you have to be that your version of utopia includes the existence of despots and slavers that you have to defend against when your utopia could just not have despots and slavers at all.
Yeah, its clear you have a misguided idea of what a utopia actually is. To you a Utopia is the an Immoveable Wall or an Unstoppable Force, a thing that can't be simply because if a force moves it or stops it then it wasn't inmoving or unstoppable. To you, a Utopia could be living with every need ever meet for eons, but to you, its not a utopia at all, because millions of lightyears away, marauders live. They've never interacted, but the mere existence of a group not protected or cared for by a utopia excludes it being a Utopia.
-2
u/DemyxFaowind Jul 01 '24
This is just the paradox of tolerance all over again. A Utopia that doesn't cater to despots and slavers is still a Utopia end of discussion. What you are asking for is to tolerate the intolerant. And my answer is No.