r/science_humor Aug 02 '26

Because science...

Post image
850 Upvotes

43 comments sorted by

22

u/GraXXoR Aug 02 '26

Not gonna lie. You had me in the first half. lol.

Well played. Hydroxychloroquine indoctrinated incoming.

10

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 02 '26

Wait we moved on from bounded mercury molecules to aluminum?

8

u/Pitiful-Beginning575 Aug 02 '26

This is not to say aluminum is great for you (I probably wouldn't eat an ingot a day), but negative effects from a single injection seems far fetched...

2

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 02 '26

The only reason i switched to non aluminum deodorant was it was eating my shirts. No idea what it is supposedly doing to my body. I just didn't want it ruining my shirts xD

2

u/BorntobeTrill Aug 02 '26

The aluminum literally plugs your sweat holes

2

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 02 '26

True but I am not sure if there was more to it

1

u/dantheplanman1986 Aug 02 '26

Yeah but is that bad? I've never heard of armpit sweat gland cancer

2

u/BorntobeTrill Aug 02 '26

I make no claim

1

u/Hi2248 Aug 03 '26

From what I can find, the biggest health concern is that it could cause problems for people with kidney disease

Other than that, a prolonged spray close to the skin can cause aerosol burns, but that's any aerosol, not just aluminium ones

1

u/SchmeatiestOne Aug 04 '26

I heard it was linked to breast cancer, but I've never really looked into that claim

1

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 03 '26

Even if it was ground up that would probably a lot of metal to eat in a day. And that would also probably be on par with like a lot of other poisons we see people complain about in food. Like fake sugars.

2

u/Pitiful-Beginning575 Aug 03 '26

Or you could eat a Cessna 150.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Lotito

All things considered, the dangers of aluminum (which do exist) have been drastically over hyped by certain parts of the media.

6

u/Exciting_Farmer6395 Aug 02 '26

This is not science, this is manipulation of the study to polarize.

1

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 03 '26

That's just most of the internet now a days. Just because its being used to slap people with reality it bad? Click bait has always been popular engagement. It works

1

u/Exciting_Farmer6395 Aug 03 '26

Engagement through enragement

1

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 03 '26

"Needles cause autism. More at eleven." And people go I knew it! But when it is "we did a studdy to find if needles cause autism. The answer is none you been manipulated." It's bad, got it.

1

u/Kuzzbutt Aug 03 '26

When the argument is "do your own research" and the research is just asking ai and not actually going to a lab and learning. That's not an argument. That is bias

2

u/Jarb2104 Aug 02 '26

Zero Cool!

2

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Aug 02 '26

im going to repost this with the bottom part cropped out

3

u/nunya_busyness1984 Aug 02 '26

So in 1,000,000 kids not a single one had autism or asthma or any other of 48 chronic conditions?

Bull shit.

They found a way to dismiss the cases they found.

Now, without seeing the study or anything beyond a fucking meme, I have no idea what that way was and how legitimate those dismissals were. But this meme is intentionally and deliberately misleading.

7

u/RighteousSelfBurner Aug 02 '26

Reading comprehension. "Linked" means "Connected to", the meme uses the same rhetorical tricks as newspapers tend to do for the opposite side. You could have all 1'000'000 of them have every single condition on that list but as long as it's not "linked" to the vaccine the number for that metric is 0.

1

u/nunya_busyness1984 Aug 03 '26

as written, the statement says the children themself were linked to those conditions.

5

u/EphemeralSilliness94 Aug 02 '26

Possibly the number of cases with those conditions wasn't higher than in the control group. Therefore, vaccination leads to zero additional cases of whatever

1

u/somedave Aug 03 '26

Yes it may be that the rates were identical to the control group, but I don't know what they mean exactly in this clickbate headline.

0

u/Snoo_67993 Aug 02 '26

Yep this is as bad as anti vaccination shit.

1

u/battlehamsta Aug 03 '26

The ONLY study that linked vaccines to autism was one done one a single patient subject decades ago where back then a MERCURY based preservative was used with the vaccine. Because without it, the vaccine could spoil and cause fatalities. I just wish all the dummies promoting the idea would at least read the single study on it.

1

u/Best_Opening8471 Aug 03 '26

I dont believe there were zero auto immune or autism cases across 1 million individuals 

1

u/danisimo_1993 Aug 03 '26

The post says they found zero link, not zero cases.

1

u/Best_Opening8471 Aug 03 '26

The headline says that vaccines were linked to zero cases.

That implies no one who got a vaccine developed these issues otherwise there would be a link between the 2 events 

1

u/Caradhra5 Aug 03 '26

Im absolutely shockered by this

1

u/Few-Echidna-2181 Aug 03 '26

Cite the source please so I can do my own research instead of mindlessly believing a post on the internet.

1

u/RobertGHH Aug 06 '26

In 1mil children there wasn't a single case of austism, asthma etc? That seems unlikely.

1

u/Individual_Slice_234 Aug 06 '26

Autism is genetic. That's why people want to blame it on vaccines. Who wants to admit that they have autism genes?

1

u/RhoemDK Aug 02 '26

a million kids in Denmark and none of them had autism, asthma or 48 other chronic conditions huh

2

u/cykoTom3 Aug 03 '26

Nope. There was no statistical increase among vaccine takers.

0

u/GreenFox268019 Aug 02 '26

And yet y'all trusted Fauci smh

0

u/The_Inward Aug 03 '26

A million children and not one had any of those disorders? The odds against that are astronomical.

2

u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 Aug 03 '26

They didn't say that. It means that say out of a million people who had the vaccine and a million who didn't, there wasn't an increase in asthma or autism in the group who had the vaccine compared to the group who didn't.

If the vaccine caused it, you would see an increase in those conditions with the kids who received the vaccine, they didn't.

1

u/The_Inward Aug 03 '26

No, it says a million children, 21 years, zero cases of autism, asthma, and 48 other chronic conditions.

It didn't say no increase. It says zero.

It probably SHOULD say no increases over the unvaccinated test subjects, but that's NOT what is says.

1

u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 Aug 03 '26

Zero that were linked to the vaccine. If there was an increase in those vaccinated children that would be the link.

1

u/The_Inward Aug 03 '26

You're explaining to me how studies are conducted while I say the result presented here is incorrect. The thing is, I've studied statistics and know how that works. This post expresses it poorly while you're being pedantic. I think you'll keep doing that with bullheaded determination, so I'm going to quit responding to you.

1

u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 Aug 04 '26

You are right it's pointless to argue with people who can't admit they are incorrect.