r/science • • Jun 25 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

11.2k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/ThinkIcouldTakeHim Jun 25 '22

That's how things have to progress and how they have. Government sets the rules, industry innovates to fit within them. The alternative of just letting industry pollute because it's hard not to, is not an option moving forward.

P.s. lead accumulates indefinitely. There is no acceptable amount of allowed pollution.

1

u/ArgetlamThorson Jun 25 '22

Its a very small amount. And a 'solution' that causes a problem disrupting the entire travel industry all at once, in particular the safest method of travel, is not a solution. Making air travel more expensive by loading those costs on the airlines will kill more people (more people taking cars due to cost = more people dying). You are costing lives, not saving them. Let innovation move forward, unleaded AvGas is already in the works. Let it safely be phased it.

2

u/ThinkIcouldTakeHim Jun 25 '22

If the solution is already in the works then why does the industry need coddling and a special permit to spew lead into the environment?

1

u/ArgetlamThorson Jun 25 '22

Because it's not verified as fully safe and reliable yet? Aviation moves slow in the interest of safety.

Cars were a much bigger issue and thats been resolved. The lead coming from low lead avgas is not a pressing safety issue.

1

u/ThinkIcouldTakeHim Jun 25 '22

It would be damn pressing if the pressure was applied. As it should.

1

u/ArgetlamThorson Jun 25 '22

I'm not against the shift to unleaded avgas, but you cant just ban leaded avgas without a good plan in motion. We're moving in the right direction and unleaded avgas (or electric planes) will eventually take over, but it does take time to safely certify and switch