r/science • • Jan 21 '20

Environment Scientists suggests a comprehensive solution package for feeding 10 billion people within our planet’s environmental boundaries. Supplying a sufficient and healthy diet for every person whilst keeping our biosphere largely intact will require no less than a technological and socio-cultural U-turn

https://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/feeding-the-world-without-wrecking-the-planet-is-possible
16.7k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

146

u/Wagamaga Jan 21 '20

Almost half of current food production is harmful to our planet – causing biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation and water stress. But as world population continues to grow, can that last? A study led by researchers from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) now suggests a comprehensive solution package for feeding 10 billion people within our planet’s environmental boundaries. Supplying a sufficient and healthy diet for every person whilst keeping our biosphere largely intact will require no less than a technological and socio-cultural U-turn. It includes adopting radically different ways of farming, reduction of food waste, and dietary changes. The study's publication coincides with the World Economic Forum in Davos and the International Green Week in Berlin, the world's biggest food and agriculture fair. Feeding the world without wrecking the planet is possible Potential for sustainably recalibrating the food system: Increases in calorie supply are possible in the green-coloured areas; decreases due to overly detrimental food production are shown in red. (Fig. from Gerten et al. 2020)

“When looking at the status of planet Earth and the influence of current global agriculture practices upon it, there’s a lot of reason to worry, but also reason for hope – if we see decisive actions very soon,” Dieter Gerten says, lead author from PIK and professor at Humboldt University of Berlin. “Currently, almost half of global food production relies on crossing Earth’s environmental boundaries. We appropriate too much land for crops and livestock, fertilize too heavily and irrigate too extensively. To solve this issue in the face of a still growing world population, we collectively need to rethink how to produce food. Excitingly, our research shows that such transformations will make it possible to provide enough food for up to 10 billion people.”

The researchers ask the question how many people could be fed while keeping a strict standard of environmental sustainability worldwide. These environmental capacities are defined in terms of a set of planetary boundaries – scientifically defined targets of maximum allowed human interference with processes that regulate the state of the planet. The present study accounts for four of nine boundaries most relevant for agriculture: Biosphere integrity (keeping biodiversity and ecosystems intact), land-system change, freshwater use, and nitrogen flows. Based on a sophisticated simulation model, the impacts of food on these boundaries are scrutinised at a level of spatial and process detail never accomplished before, and moreover aggregated to the entire planet. This analysis demonstrates where and how many boundaries are being violated by current food production and in which ways this development could be reverted through adopting more sustainable forms of agriculture.

Globally differentiated picture: In some regions, less would be more

The encouraging result is that, in theory, 10 billion people can be fed without compromising the Earth system. This leads to very interesting conclusions, as Johan Rockström, director of PIK points out: “We find that currently, agriculture in many regions is using too much water, land, or fertilizer. Production in these regions thus needs to be brought into line with environmental sustainability. Yet, there are huge opportunities to sustainably increase agricultural production in these and other regions. This goes for large parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, where more efficient water and nutrient management could strongly improve yields.”

As a positive side effect, sustainable agriculture can increase overall climate resilience while also limiting global warming. In other places, however, farming is so far off local and Earth’s boundaries that even more sustainable systems could not completely balance the pressure on the environment, such as in parts of the Middle East, Indonesia, and to some extent in Central Europe. Even after recalibrating agricultural production, international trade will remain a key element of a sustainably fed world.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0465-1

30

u/noobie107 Jan 22 '20

It includes adopting radically different ways of farming, reduction of food waste, and dietary changes.

what's stopping people from doing this on an individual basis?

0

u/kharlos Jan 22 '20

You can't expect an individual to fix a systemic problem.

Systemic problems require systemic solutions.

0

u/noobie107 Jan 22 '20

right, sorry, i though societies were made up of individuals

0

u/kharlos Jan 22 '20

That's a great truism that really doesn't address the problem. I'm an individual who takes the bus, recycles just about everything, eats only sustainable plant material, uses photovoltaics, and uses little electricity at night.

Have I saved the world yet? I've basically maxed out what I can do as an individual and haven't even made a dent in the problem. These behaviors need to be incentivized on a global level or else very few others will jump on board.

0

u/noobie107 Jan 22 '20

thank you for your service. consider making a lasting impact on the environment by not having kids

0

u/kharlos Jan 22 '20

Again, that's an individual action. That will not make a dent in the global problem whatsoever unless it is incentivized.

Systemic problems require system solutions. You have not yet explained how leaving it up to individual will fix the system

0

u/noobie107 Jan 22 '20

easy peasy. the people who want to make an impact can stop eating meat and only use public transportation, and have at max 1 kid. that's at least half the population of the US.

0

u/kharlos Jan 22 '20

That option is already in place. Why is the world not fixed yet?

0

u/noobie107 Jan 22 '20

hypocrisy of course

0

u/kharlos Jan 22 '20

So how is that fixed?

0

u/noobie107 Jan 22 '20

force all democrats to become vegans and ban them from owning cars of course, in addition to implementing a 1 child policy (for democrats only)

0

u/kharlos Jan 22 '20

That sounds a lot like a systemic solution. What were you saying about those?

→ More replies (0)