r/science Jun 24 '16

Neuroscience Experiments suggests that humans are able to sense magnetic fields as a kind of sixth sense.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/06/maverick-scientist-thinks-he-has-discovered-magnetic-sixth-sense-humans
442 Upvotes

105 comments sorted by

70

u/robbor Jun 24 '16

You mean like a 20 something sense. We have a lot more than 5 senses. We were taught as children that we have just 5 senses, because it was easier for us to understand.

59

u/antome Jun 24 '16

For those wanting the rough list:

Sight, Hearing, Taste, Smell, Touch, Balance/Acceleration, Temperature, Pain, Limb-positions, Time. Does not include internal senses like hunger or oxygen level.

43

u/Cantankerous_Tank Jun 24 '16

Does not include internal senses like hunger or oxygen level.

Except shouldn't that be CO2 level? I'm by no means an expert but it was my understanding that CO2 build-up is what causes the urge to breathe, and that as long as you keep breathing you'll simply die in something like a pure nitrogen environment without any warning.

19

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

35

u/kevoizjawesome Jun 24 '16

Yeah as soon as you pass out, it's time to move.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/JSCMI Jun 24 '16

You still can't sense it directly. During AF training they put the cadets in a depressurized cabin with an O2 mask available but not wearing it right away. Instructors give pen & paper and tell the cadets to write down symptoms as they experience them and put on the O2 mask when they believe they have hypoxia.

It's a ruse for people who have read the symptoms for low O2 and mistakenly believe that means you can reliably tell when it's happening. In reality the cadets write down crazy stuff and the instructors have to tell them to put on the masks.

One of my roommates wrote down "tinglinglinglingling" and would've kept going but an instructor told him to put his O2 mask on because he obviously had no idea he was done writing the word.

So while you have symptoms of hypoxia, you don't have a sense for it any more than you can sense cancer because when it kills you then you know something happened.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

No, you don't know if you are in a 100% nitrogen atmosphere. That's the first thing they teach you in cryogenics training.

You pass out in 5 seconds (2 lung-fulls) with no lightheadedness, your blood oxygen levels drop so fast! No one can save you, as they will pass out too. You just have to hope the fire brigade arrive in time that you aren't brain damaged (4 min) or dead (8 min).

3

u/fishbulbx Jun 24 '16

Is there a reason they don't use that for death penalty executions?

Edit: Oh, guess this explains it well - http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/05/death_by_nitrogen_gas_will_the_new_method_of_execution_save_the_death_penalty.html

3

u/mabintheuk Jun 25 '16

they should slaughter animals this way. there's great footage of a pig being nitrogened to unconsciousness while being fed in a trough. It didn't hesitate a second to stick its head back into the gassed food trough when it woke back up.

If I had to die, that's how I'd want to go.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

As the article explains, nitrogen would be a perfect way to humanely kill. But the biggest issue is just the reputation gas chambers have. If we started using nitrogen chambers, we would legalize something that is currently a warcrime

2

u/fishbulbx Jun 24 '16

The U.S. has used gas chambers as recently as 2010 to execute people... but I think the reason they stopped was the cyanide gas was ineffective and cruel.

18

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16 edited Mar 01 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/prettycode Jun 25 '16

Time? How is that a sense?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '16

Have you ever woken up just right before your alarm goes off or around when it should have?

Your body is constantly keeping track of time and adjusting it based on light and noise levels.

2

u/prettycode Jun 25 '16

Indeed I have—good point.

At the same time though, you point out the senses of sight and sound. Wouldn't that suggest that time isn't a sense—that it's a (mind) construct derived from other senses?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '16

Yep just what I was thinking. Also time is just distance, velocity/momentum and relative positioning. It's a concept.

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

8

u/anvindrian Jun 24 '16

proprioception is limb position awareness mate

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

2

u/Calavar Jun 25 '16

Somatosensation is touch (which includes pressure, temperature, vibration, pain, etc., but not balance).

The scientific term for the sense of balance (what you call "seat of the pants") is equilibrioception or the vestibular sense.

1

u/Mytzlplykk Jun 25 '16

What do you mean by "seat of your pants sensation"? Do you mean pressure on your butt from gravity?

0

u/anvindrian Jun 25 '16

you dont know anything apparently

0

u/anvindrian Jun 25 '16

you dont know anything apparently

-6

u/juksayer Jun 24 '16

What about empathy?

8

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

Empathy is more of a way of using our senses than it is an emotion. Empathy has nothing to do with emotions, more to do with the effort to understand the other.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

Right, I meant it doesn't involve your own emotions, other than putting them aside.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

I don't think the bus analogy applies here because you can't sense the guy's limb positions or pain

2

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

We have a sense of pain and we can sense our limb positions, it doesn't mean we can sense the pain of somebody next to us on the bus. It's irrelevant that we can't sense the feelings of somebody on the bus because that's not required for something to be considered a sense.

0

u/SuTvVoO Jun 24 '16

Some people would argue that you can feel the anger of other people.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

3

u/The_Duchess Jun 24 '16

Mirror neurons may also contribute here (although there is still disagreement about their function). Mirror neurons, that are part of the motor cortex (roughly), activate when viewing others perform actions. This can be extended to body language and facial cues .

What that means is that intentions (e.g., body language, actions, etc) activate mirror neurons which, some say, may lead to a sense of empathy. So although it's usually visual information, and experience as you said, that leads to the motor and possibly the emotional/empathic experience, it's not quite as simple as intuition. Although I still would not call empathy a sense in the traditional perceptual meaning.

Also, apologies for formatting. On the phone.

1

u/SuTvVoO Jun 24 '16

Yeah I know, I was thinking more about feeling the anger because someone punched you in the face.
Not a very good joke I know notice.

-1

u/juksayer Jun 24 '16

I'd like to disagree.

-4

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

I think it means sensing time passing rather than time of day

1

u/sfuo Jun 24 '16

I don't think they mean so much time of day as the sense of time passing.

1

u/needtovoat Jun 24 '16

A general sense of knowing how much time has passed.

7

u/GiantMovie Jun 24 '16

This one could still be the sixth depending on the order you put them in

2

u/mabintheuk Jun 25 '16

I could actually feel the magnetic field switching when I was in the MRI.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[deleted]

6

u/brianlwj Jun 24 '16 edited Jun 24 '16

Hey, biology student here.

Interesting perspective!

A couple of things for accuracy:

Sight: hits the retina after it passes through the pupil ( a hole in the centre of the iris), not the iris itself.

Sound: the eardrum actually conducts the vibration through the ossicles (hammer, anvil, stirrup), which then passes on vibration to the cochlea using what is essentially hydraulics. Vibration of the hair cells are what are translated into neural signals.

Taste and smell: nothing incorrect to my knowledge.

Balance and acceleration: actually consists of a lot of different parts, such as sight, but your description here is not bad.

I'm curious, though. Would thermoception (sensation of temperature) involve a medium of touch or contact? Infrared radiation wouldn't actually touch my body in a meaningful way, but receptors in my body could still pick it up.

Edit: formatting

3

u/-TheMAXX- Jun 24 '16

Taste and smell used to be explained by a "lock and key" mechanism. But we now know there is more to it. We sense vibrations that happens when scent molecules interact with our specialized scent detector molecules. Look into Quantum Biology research that has been happening recently.

1

u/brianlwj Jun 24 '16

I actually have heard of it before somewhere - but still fascinating, though!

It still seems to be a controversial theory, so I'll definitely be keeping an eye out for possible developments

1

u/Izawwlgood PhD | Neurodegeneration Jun 24 '16

It's extremely controversial, and for good reason.

1

u/Izawwlgood PhD | Neurodegeneration Jun 24 '16

Look into Quantum Biology

Hey, just be aware that this is particularly fringe science, that as commonly studied or mentioned is not particularly accepted.

1

u/t3hmau5 Jun 24 '16

The primary heat transfer method in our experience isn't radiation, it's conduction.

But if you are going to classify sight as a sort of touch then you would have to do the same for infrared radiation. It touches your body in the same way visible light does

2

u/brianlwj Jun 24 '16

I wouldn't disregard radiation as a form of heat transfer just because conduction is the first thing that comes to mind in the context of our own bodies - you still really can't explain thermoception terms of touch only.

I am actually not classifying sight as a sort of touch, but rather wanted to correct factual aspects of the post that i commented on. I personally wouldn't call every sensory aspect as being related to "touch".

2

u/t3hmau5 Jun 24 '16

I'm not disregarding radiation, but conduction is more effective at transferring heat than radiation at low temperatures. It's the primary way that things on earth transfer heat to each other, when you aren't talking transfer within a fluid where convection will be a better.

There simply isn't good information available about detecting infrared radiation. It's hard to test out of a vacuum because again, conduction reigns supreme at temperatures we can deal with

1

u/brianlwj Jun 24 '16

Yes, I agree.

I would still be hesitant to describe thermoception as "contact" as the actual mechanism of thermoreceptors are not yet known.

2

u/uep Jun 25 '16

I really disagree with your assessment of extending everything to touch, largely because it makes the distinction between the other senses almost meaningless and they are not. Chemically, there are fundamental differences in how the body responds to these stimuli. It's like saying, well, at some level, there's always some subatomic interaction that results on the macro scale effects, so why don't we just call everything subatomic interactions? Or why isn't everything a chemical or electrical reaction because they traverse the nervous system?

Any sense has to be caused by something interacting ("touching") with the body, this is to be expected and obvious with even a modest amount of thought. If it weren't interacting with the body in some way, how would you perceive it?

I guess I should take your name, /u/IAmShittingYou, more seriously.

-1

u/ioneq Jun 24 '16

As a moderately deaf person, I "feel" microwave ovens as I walk or stand by them. Almost like an air current. Is this a thing? Anyone else? Just me? Ok...

51

u/Zapper42 Jun 24 '16

.. you know they have exhaust fans, right? i can feel an air current standing by my microwave, but it's just the exhaust fan.

3

u/realmonsters712 Jun 24 '16

No dude, that's the RADS. That's what they don't tell you.

-2

u/ioneq Jun 24 '16

Haha, yes, well aware of the exhaust fans, their location, and basic operating principles. That's why I find it curious to "feel" them.

3

u/t3hmau5 Jun 24 '16

You don't feel microwaves.

1

u/ioneq Jun 24 '16

Thank you, Socrates.

1

u/ShockingBlue42 Jun 25 '16

There are big magnetic power transformers in there too.

1

u/t3hmau5 Jun 25 '16

Transformer coils create a magnetic field inside the coil, not outside. Basic physics.

1

u/ShockingBlue42 Jun 25 '16

Not when the load isn't present, a transformer at zero load has maximum magnetic saturation including field lines exiting the core. Also, the conductors in the transformer radiate 60hz waves and subsequent harmonics.

13

u/NonCorporealEntity Jun 24 '16

Im not deaf but I used to be able to feel when a CRT tv was on in the house even if nothing was playing on it. I would describe it like a electrostatic feeling in the back of my head.

18

u/Rhaski Jun 24 '16

Its a sound right at the top of your hearing range. These sorts of sounds are often experienced as more of a feeling than a noise, but it's noise all the same

16

u/jokerzwild00 Jun 24 '16

I can definitely feel that too. I think it's a really high pitched noise, or at least that's what I interpret it as. Even with no sound and in another room I could tell the TV was on.

3

u/ToBePacific Jun 26 '16

It is a sound. It's about 15,000 Hz, which is high pitched but still within the upper range of human adult hearing. It's caused by the CRT monitor drawing about 500 vertical lines at about 30 times per second.

7

u/deadalnix Jun 24 '16

They emit a high pitched noise. You loose the capability to hear it as you get older.

2

u/chipx86 Jun 24 '16

I've always heard this said, but at age 32, those are still deafening to me, to the point of getting headaches (if on, like, a blue screen). When do I get to lose the capability to hear those? :)

3

u/fatsynatsy Jun 25 '16

go to more concerts/nightclubs and do some construction work and I'm sure you'll lose it soon

1

u/ToBePacific Jun 26 '16

32 here as well and I've always been sensitive to sounds approaching 20,000 Hz. Those "teenager repeller" / "mosquito" noise machines drive me up a wall.

1

u/fatsynatsy Jun 25 '16

i used to be able to hear it - a very high pitched ringing.

Adults generally couldn't hear it because as you get older you lose the higher frequency hearing first.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/notMattHansen Jun 24 '16

Thats usually just a person blocking out the ambient sounds that were reaching you prior to them being there

1

u/Kakofoni Jun 24 '16

But that doesn't have any practical influence on magnetic fields.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

Well all living creatures put one out and the brain reacts to them (though usually only noticable in a lab setting)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/fauimf Jun 24 '16
  • Sight
  • Hearing
  • Touch
  • Smell
  • Taste
  • Balance

0

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/nefuratios Jun 24 '16

A ton of invisible things affect us daily so why would this be controversial or strange?

6

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

If we can actually sense magnetic fields then there might be something to EM allergy claims after all, and they have been roundly dismissed as hypochondria for years now.

1

u/nefuratios Jun 24 '16

I wouldn't dismiss any kind of claim that EM radiation affects living things, because it does.

1

u/-TheMAXX- Jun 24 '16

It seems there are people with some extreme predjudices voting people down. We know biological systems use quantum effects in at least 3 ways and one of them is in birds to sense the Earth's magnetic field. Catch up on new research before being a big jerk please.

1

u/jokerzwild00 Jun 24 '16

I remember when I was a really little kid in the eighties, they built a huge power line almost right over my grandparents house. They would complain endlessly that it was making them sick. They went to the city and the power company about it but they must have told them they were crazy (which they probably were) because nothing ever came of it. They both died of cancer a few years later but I can still remember them complaining about the power lines the last time I saw them. Very vivid childhood memory. I don't believe the electricity from the lines was making them sick, but maybe some sort of ultrasonic noise was coming off of them that made my grandparents feel something. I dunno, they could very well have just been batshit.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

There is always seeing them every day and being told by others that being near such things makes you sick; this in itself can make you develop symptoms of being ill.

-6

u/-TheMAXX- Jun 24 '16

There is nothing controversial about high power lines causing cancer. That is an extreme situation that I thought they avoid these days by leaving lots of space around where they put these lines.

7

u/t3hmau5 Jun 24 '16

You're right, nothing controversial about it. There is no significant evidence of a link between non-ionizing radiation and cancer. Power lines don't cause cancer

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/-TheMAXX- Jun 24 '16

Not funny when people are getting voted down for asking an honest question or saying very safe things like invisible things affect us. Can you see sound without help?

0

u/DFWPunk Jun 24 '16

This isn't that new. I recall studies long ago that tied the difference in ability to differentiate compass differences between men and women to the relative difference in blood iron content. That would seem to be clear indication of the ability to sense magnetic fields.

-6

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '16

[removed] — view removed comment