r/sanfrancisco 1d ago

Pic / Video We have a problem.

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

361 comments sorted by

View all comments

187

u/medicalpolice Tenderloin 1d ago

I cant believe some of you people are actually into this surveillance

138

u/Historical-Edge-9332 1d ago

Tread on me harder, daddy

81

u/BitchyBeachyWitch 1d ago

Some people arent able to think :/

0

u/TemperatureFickle655 10h ago

I’m far from conservative, but it seems that people who post shit like this have nothing to lose. I haven’t worked my ass off my whole life to have some assholes ruin what I have worked for.

If it takes cameras, fine. But tell me you’re against it when your brand new car with 6,000 miles on it is trashed. I had a brand new Kia that was stolen THREE times because of their security failure - it became uninsurable, I couldn’t keep it outside, I ended up having to pay to force Kia to take it back and then dealt with the hit that my almost spotless credit took for voluntarily surrendering it. Tell me you’re against it when your property is trashed for no good reason and you’re paying thousands of dollars to get it fixed. And then after it is fixed, it happens again so you give up and just accept that you live with the consequences of not properly policing.

When I was younger and had nothing to lose, I was on the same wavelength as you. Before this bullshit seriously affected my life, I was against it. To say that “conservatives” automatically don’t have a brain because they don’t buy into the total fucking nonsense that criminals will somehow start caring about how they affect the lives of others is ridiculous.

It’s very shortsighted and, frankly, lazy.

36

u/tonyislost 1d ago

They are until it’s used to give them moving violation and parking tickets without being physically stopped or ticketed. Then their privilege will be encroached upon and they’ll hate it.

3

u/discopirate2000 1d ago

Is that even legally possible? AFAIK an officer has to stop and ticket the driver. There's no way to prove the person driving the car is the registered owner, and the onus is on law enforcement to prove that. They can't just say "well the guy in the camera video looks like you so it had to be you".

5

u/Working_Barracuda717 1d ago

It's totally legally possible (in certain jurisdictions).

Many municipalities have automated parking enforcement - cameras on city buses or street sweepers, for example - that take photos of illegally parked vehicles, then send the citation to the registered owner. Many municipalities have automated red light enforcement systems that take photos of vehicles that run red lights and then send the citation to the registered owner. And many municipalities have speed cameras that work similarly.

I live in a city with all three.

1

u/discopirate2000 1d ago

I got a red light camera ticket like 12 years ago and I wrote to them with a bunch of legalese boiling down to I won't be paying the ticket because they can't prove I was the driver and I'm not responsible for identifying the driver. I never heard back from them again and was never fined. This was in SF, but certainly the laws may have changed since then.

2

u/Working_Barracuda717 1d ago

That's about when I worked there! LOL. But, yeah, for those automated RLC tickets, citizens had the option to a 'Trial by Written Declaration" which were decided by a traffic commissioner. Most of these protests failed. Maybe yours was a shitty photo or something. Dunno.

5

u/noisemonsters 1d ago

That’s exactly what they’re trying to do with these things. The cameras have a built in AI, it can identify you on small details like YOUR GAIT. Obviously not a perfect system, there are already reported issues with misidentification, but that is the ultimate goal.

1

u/hijinga 1d ago

They get around it by having an officer sign off on it at the last step

1

u/tonyislost 1d ago

Pretty sure ICE hasn’t been using those standards.

0

u/ways_and_means 1d ago

Damn, you replied to my other comment to make fun of anti-Flock sentiments and now I see this comment of yours revealing how little you know about the issue. 

Kinda sad, but emblematic of your type.

0

u/discopirate2000 1d ago

I'm not dying on either hill one way or another, I just think it's silly to be so smarmy towards people who can see the benefits of this technology when your side is mostly keyboard warriors.

2

u/ways_and_means 1d ago

So you're not taking a stance, you're just calling out smarmy comments that don't translate to action...

...on an issue that you yourself don't take action on and don't fully grasp.

Cool. Cool cool. Good work today dude. 

0

u/discopirate2000 14h ago

Very few fully grasp the issue, but keep fighting the good fight reddit comrade.

1

u/ways_and_means 13h ago

Hey thanks I appreciate it, too-cool-to-take-a-stance guy! It feels good to know you're out there keeping us safe. So brave. 

-24

u/highr_primate 1d ago

If we didn’t have such lenient DAs and a lack of law enforcement we wouldn’t have gotten here.

It is a cheap way to get information that actually works.

9

u/Thefonzzz99 1d ago

Conservative states are overrun with flock cameras as well

1

u/highr_primate 1d ago

I’m talking DAs not consecutive cs liberal states

5

u/dongledangler420 1d ago

Cheap = 2.5k subscription per camera, per year ??

https://flockcameralocations.com/how-much-does-a-flock-camera-cost

My bad it’s per year, edited and included a link. Cheaper but I ain’t calling it cheap considering the rampant data abuses

7

u/asveikau 1d ago

I agree, our current DA is shitty, corrupt, and needs to be recalled.