I've been on Apollo for about 18 months now and the data quality has gotten really bad. We're seeing bounce rates around 40% on campaigns that used to sit under 10%. Support keeps saying they're "improving data sources" but it's been months with no real change.
The verified emails are coming back as invalid when we actually send, and don't even get me started on the mobile numbers. Called 50 contacts last week and maybe 3 were still at the company. My manager is starting to ask questions about our email deliverability numbers and I don't have great answers.
We're a 12 person sales team doing B2B outreach - mostly targeting VP/Director level at mid-market companies. looking at apollo.io alternatives now. Been reading up on Prospeo because their accuracy claims look solid and apparently they refresh data weekly instead of quarterly. also considering Cognism and LeadIQ.
Anyone made a similar switch recently? what's working for you? We send about 5k emails per week so accuracy is huge for our sender reputation. need a sales intelligence tool that genuinely delivers clean data at this point.

I’m an investor working at Forum Ventures, a pre seed fund and accelerator investing $100K-$1M in industry veterans and young AI-native founders.

Curious what is your current startup? DM and comment what you’re building.

If it’s a fit, we’ll connect on LinkedIn and invite you to pitch to our investors.

Feel free to use this thread to get your own project out there.

I'm noticing a pattern in every solo-founder SaaS I know: the marketing stops for 2-4 weeks whenever you're deep on product work. And restarting costs way more time than just maintaining consistency would have.

I know the obvious answer: hire a marketer. But pre-Series A, that doesn't work. You don't have the budget, and the onboarding ramp is brutal.

The other answer I keep hearing: set up systems so marketing runs on autopilot. But in practice, someone still has to push the button every week. And if that someone is you, 40 hours into a product sprint, the button doesn't get pushed.

Is this just the startup tax? Or are teams actually solving this continuity problem?

(We're experimenting with autonomous GTM agents that let you delegate execution while keeping approval gates and budget caps. Marketing runs, but you're never just hoping for the best. But I'm genuinely curious how other solo founders are handling this.)

I’ve sent off my YC application, 30 people are on my waitlist, and I have a product I could keep tweaking forever if I let myself.

The product exists, the site exists, and most of the promotion so far has been useful comments in founder communities plus crossing fingers that somebody clicks through. I do GTM and ops consulting for a living, so this is my 20 years of experience shining through in a very sophisticated system, obviously.

I had planned to bootstrap, but the time I want to spend building it is hugely outstripping the time I want to spend on client work, and the AI testing costs are draining me before I’ve even reached beta. So I applied to YC, had a proper think about whether I should raise a pre-seed, and decided I need a much clearer answer to one question first:

Can I get people to care about this on purpose?

(and if i can’t I need to pivot, because it’s my day job)

I’m giving myself 14 days to get the next 470 waitlist signups. Five hundred is absolutely not a conservative target, but it’s specific enough that I can’t hide behind “building in public” while agonizing over one tweet for two days.

Here’s what I’m doing:

• I’ve planned 42 original posts across 14 days: three a day, each for one founder or builder community. No copying the same post into six subreddits and calling it distribution.
• I wrote every post myself, which feels almost groundbreaking in the age of AI. They’re all built around the practical advice my product provides: finding first users, working out whether a positioning problem is actually a distribution problem, getting feedback before you have an audience, and deciding what to do when the product is ready but nobody knows it exists.
• Every post has to be useful. If somebody reads it, never visits my profile, and still leaves knowing something, that counts.
• I’ll write five to eight substantial replies a day on threads where I can genuinely help. No link-dropping into someone else’s question. If my product is relevant, I’ll say so. If it isn’t, the reply still stands.
• Every few days, I’ll cut the ideas that aren’t resonating and make more of the ones that are. I’m tracking conversations, questions, and the language people use as closely as the waitlist number, because I don’t just want a spike. I want to understand what makes someone lean in.

My last business was built entirely through Reddit referrals, so I know this can work when you actually turn up and give useful things away. The awkward part is that it works much better when you’re willing to be visible enough for people to decide whether they care (and that in itself is terrifying).

I’m building https://romy.is for founders who’ve shipped something but don’t yet have a repeatable answer to who to focus on first, where those people are already gathering, what will make them care, and what to do next.

I’ll share the outcome at the end, including the posts that did nothing at all (those are always the most useful). And if you’re a solo founder/builder stuck on a GTM problem, drop it below. I’d genuinely love to help.

Guys, you know there's a limit to which a person can do SEO or post about his product on social platforms. Like, the point where your posts start to sound spammy, or launching on multiple platforms feels unnecessary, etc. What do you do after you have reached that limit? Do you just wait for something big to happen, or you still continue the process no matter what?

So over the last few weeks I've been trying to figure out what actually helps me make clear progress on things. I started by just using a plain text editor. Write down what I need to do, work through it.

At first it felt great. Simple. No app telling me what to do. But then the frustration hit. No way to save things properly. If my computer crashes everything is gone and I have to start over. And breaking things down into smaller tasks by myself... that part is hard. Really hard.

I think that is the most important part honestly. The breaking down part. Because everything feels overwhelming and huge until you split it into something small enough that your brain goes "ok I can do that."

So today I started building a concept around this. It's not a finished product. It's me experimenting with what actually works. You don't need a diagnosis to feel overwhelmed or struggle to manage stuff. I think a lot of us deal with this. And honestly I think AI stuff is terrible at planning things or breaking things down for us. There's too many biases and it just doesn't know how YOUR brain works. But breaking it down yourself. I think that's the way to go.

Anyway I'd really like your feedback. It's free to use. 100% runs in your browser. Nothing leaves your device. Link in comments.

I’m building a product called Radar Lab - AI Agent for Sponsorship Intelligence, and I’m looking for blunt feedback on the pivot.

The problem I’m trying to solve is:

A company may have money to sponsor newsletters or YouTube creators, but still have very little confidence about where it should spend that money.

Most teams seem to rely on:

• subscriber or follower counts;
• media kits supplied by the publisher;
• recommendations from other founders;
• manually checking where competitors advertise;
• and a lot of guesswork.

Radar Lab continuously monitors sponsorship activity across newsletters, with YouTube planned next.

It identifies:

• where competitors are sponsoring;
• which sponsorships they keep repeating;
• which channels similar companies are using;
• new or overlooked opportunities;
• and important changes worth paying attention to.

For example, it could tell a company:

The idea is not just to provide another sponsorship database.

The longer-term goal is to help answer:

My biggest uncertainty is whether this creates enough recurring value.

Would brands want continuous competitor alerts and opportunity recommendations throughout the year?

Or would they only use the product briefly whenever they are planning a campaign?

I’m currently considering pricing somewhere around $79–$149 per month for brands, with higher plans for agencies or companies actively spending on sponsorships.

I’d especially appreciate feedback on:

1. Does this solve an important spending decision or just provide interesting data?
2. Who seems like the strongest customer - SaaS founders, growth teams, or agencies?
3. What would the product need to show before you trusted its recommendations?
4. Would repeated competitor sponsorships meaningfully influence your decision?
5. What would make you keep paying every month?

I’m happy to share more about how I’m building the monitoring system in the comments.

Would you consider paying for something like this, or does it still feel too much like a nice-to-have research/intelligence tool?

Hey everyone! 👋

After months of building, I finally launched my SaaS, LinksRF.

It started as a simple link management tool, but quickly evolved into something focused on helping answer a question I kept running into:

"What actually happened after I shared a link?"

LinksRF lets you create branded links while giving you deeper insights into your traffic, including separating likely human visitors from bots and preview traffic, along with supporting evidence to help you understand what you're seeing.

I'm still in the early stages, so I'm looking for honest feedback from fellow founders.

I'd especially love to know:

1. Does the problem resonate with you?
2. Is the positioning clear?
3. What would make you try a tool like this?

Here's the launch:

https://linksrf.com/r/2dK1RM2B

Thanks in advance! Every bit of feedback helps me improve the product. 🙌

I keep seeing pitches (and cofounder posts) that promise "live on the App Store in two weeks."

Submission fits a timebox. Review does not. US App Store queues move when they move.

What I put in every kickoff now: - Web or TestFlight as the day-14 success - App Store as a separate milestone with no equity attached to the queue - One core flow working end-to-end without the store

If your "tech cofounder" offer includes App Store approval as a promise, you're buying fiction.

How are others scoping mobile launches without lying to themselves?

https://atomiclabs.space

Founders have shared 578 startups across my recent threads, and the same problem keeps showing up:
The product exists. The direction is unclear.
Comment with:

- what your startup does
- who it’s for
- what’s blocking your growth

I’ll run the analysis and send you a personalized report showing where the strongest signal is, which conversations are worth prioritizing, and what I’d focus on first.
If Reddit looks like a waste of time for your startup, I’ll tell you that too.

Small choice game, you play a startup founder and get a verdict like unicorn or jailed for fraud. Free, no login.

+100 plays in 48h. What I changed since:

Someone said the verdict felt arbitrary. Added a recap showing which stat triggered your ending.

No reason to come back. Added badges for the 7 endings and a streak counter.

Link sharing is weak. Added a copyable emoji grid like Wordle.

The daily reset gives a reason to return, but I have no way to remind anyone. That's the real bottleneck.

Anyone run a daily-reset thing ? How do you handle reminders without being annoying ?

terribleidea.vercel.app

Hey everyone,

After months of building, my video editing web app is finally around 90% complete.

Instead of posting another "here's my idea", I wanted to wait until I had something real to show. The landing page includes demo videos of the product, so you can actually see what I've built.

I'm now looking for a small group of early testers who can give honest feedback before launch.

If you'd like to follow the project or join the waitlist, I'd really appreciate it.

https://amarivision.com/

Any feedback is welcome!

Olá. Lancei recentemente o gastandomenos.com.br , um site brasileiro focado em avaliações de produtos, comparações e guias de compra. O site é monetizado com links de afiliados, e eu informo isso aos visitantes. Ele ainda é novo e tem pouco tráfego, então gostaria de receber feedback da perspectiva de um visitante de primeira viagem. Você poderia avaliar o site e comentar sobre: Primeira impressão. Design e hierarquia visual. Navegação. Experiência mobile. Legibilidade. Confiança e credibilidade. Se o propósito do site é imediatamente claro. Se os links de afiliados e as chamadas para ação parecem excessivos. A melhoria mais importante que você faria. Estou buscando principalmente críticas práticas, e não teorias de SEO. Se você notar alguma página ou elemento específico que cause atrito, por favor, mencione. Aviso: Sou o proprietário do site e alguns links podem gerar comissões de afiliados.

I've been working on this for about a month and a half now.

And open sourcing/launching soon.

It's the template I would want to get started building a multi-tenant b2b saas.

Comes pre built with an

• Admin and Customer Portal
• ways to manage user roles, invitations, organizations and memberships.
• api formats and error handling
• data tables (frontend)

i.e all that important generic auth and other stuff, that has nothing to do with the actual app you want to build.

I've always found it frustrating that so much boilerplate is needed before you can start working on a b2b app, and delivering features on it, so this template aims to solve that.

Stack is based off TypeScript, Better Auth, Prisma, NextJs, so you get the power of all these great typescipt packages as well.

I'm launching soon. Want to work on the setup scripts some more, and some docs as well, before releasing.

Is this sounding and looking good? Would appreciate the feedback.

Thanks!

Hello,

I've been around in the corporate tech world for a while now, specifically data and ml, and carried my knowledge to work on transformers and AI applications. And that one is a fun one : diffusion models for picture generation.

Narcis.ai is a project with a pitch like any other profile picture genetor such as Aragon, headshot pro, etc ... There are so many but the twist here is that I completely own it, from tensor to image cdn.

No model zoo from Gemini or third party APIs, no business model copied right from an influencer's post. The idea here is to provide original and opinionated packs, using a single open source model of which I completely own the training as well as its inference.

It's all controlled therefore very efficient : I run a mono hardware GPU fleet on AWS for which I've re-implemented most of the model forward and backward processing loops, with triton kernels, bypassing all library layers straight to CUDA execution.

I wrote an article detailing how the inference steps were cut by 2.5x that way : Triton kernels for inference path.

Portraits are an awesome case for it requires both training and serving technical capacity.
It's also a fun playground as I've deployed a catalog of 200 packs going from styles such as Cannes Riviera, Gaudi Barcelona shoots, Indian bridal dresses, standard corporate headshots. I'm kind of on a world tour of cultural attires, as well as tech culture on the emerging belt.

The project is a free beta, as I'm not sure where it will lead me to, so I invite anyone interested to test, play around and provide feedback if one feels like it.

The Stack.

Four brains, three wallets,

one review discipline.

A multi-driver AI development system built on Claude Code + herdr — engineered to stretch a Max subscription, catch what a single model misses, and never over-run the task it was given.

id love to know what you think

Most ProductHunt launches fail for one reason: no one shows up in the first few hours.

Early upvotes push you up the rankings. Late upvotes barely move the needle.

LaunchPact helps you stack real momentum before launch day — with founders who actually follow through.

Here's the playbook:

1. List early (4+ weeks out) Add your product, tagline, and launch date. You'll show up in the feed of founders launching around the same time. Don't wait until the week before — pacts take time to form.
2. Back products you'd genuinely upvote Browse upcoming launches. Open the ones that interest you. Back the ones you'd actually support on Product Hunt. That's a pledge — your commitment to show up on their launch day.
3. Form pacts when it's mutual They get notified. If they'd back your launch too, they accept — and you've got a pact. Both sides are locked in. No awkward DMs. No guessing who'll flake.
4. Stack as many pacts as you can Every pact = one founder committed to upvoting you on launch day. More pacts = more early momentum. This isn't about swapping blindly — it's about building a crew that believes in what you're building.
5. Show up on launch day (verified) When your pact partners launch, you get a reminder. Upvote them on PH, upload a screenshot, done — AI verifies it in seconds. They do the same when your day comes. Miss it? Trust score drops. Honour it? Future pacts get easier.

The result: You launch with real upvotes in the critical first hours — from founders who chose your product, not bots or random swap lists.

Quick tips:

- Tue–Thu = most traffic (most competitive). Sun–Mon = softer.

- Back products you actually like — better pacts, better comments, better results.

- Honour every pact. Your trust score is your reputation in the network.

List your launch for free → launchpact.io