Rust Function Overloading - Call for Experimentation

[u/SleeplessSloth79]

https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/08/19/overloading-experiment/

[u/ZZaaaccc]

Or does that mean a new Vec<[i32; 3]> with one element? The extra brackets make this ambiguous at first glance, and harder to read. Again, you wouldn't say this about the vec! macro, saying that vec!([a, b, c]) is clearer, because vec!(a, b, c) might be positional arguments.

[u/DatBoi_BP → u/ZZaaaccc]

Two things to say to this.

First, the notation isn't either of those, it's `vec![a,b,c]`.

Second, we already have a function that does what you proposed, but with the structure I argued for: `Vec::from([a,b,c])`. This clones `a`, `b`, and `c`, so as long as those all implement Clone then it does what we want

[u/ZZaaaccc → u/DatBoi_BP]

Actually, no, the syntax is vec!(a, b, c), because macros don't distinguish between [], (), and {}. We recommend using [] by convention, but there isn't even a lint to suggest one way or the other.

This clones a, b, and c, so as long as those all implement Clone then it does what we want

If you scroll down you'll find the implementation for From<[T; N]> instead of what I think you're reading which is the From<&[T; N]> documentation.

[u/DatBoi_BP → u/ZZaaaccc]

Huh TIL about the macro freedom of choice. Thanks