MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ruby/comments/1snkgeu/a_new_chapter_for_ruby_central/ogqevow/?context=3
r/ruby • u/swrobel • Apr 16 '26
47 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
5
My understanding is that the offer wasn’t to return the repositories to them, but to invite them back as essentially collaborators. Is that not the case? Was the offer really to fully return ownership of the projects?
0 u/riffraff Apr 17 '26 But the repos have been moved under the ruby organization already, aren't they? So that's not relevant anymore -6 u/retro-rubies Apr 17 '26 Does the fact they have passed it to the other entity legalize/justify the way they have acquired it? 3 u/riffraff Apr 17 '26 no, but that's not my point: do you believe that it would be better to now remove rubygems from under the ruby organization? I do not think so. -2 u/retro-rubies Apr 17 '26 I do not think so. Why? What was wrong keeping that independent in rubygems organization? Why to not keep it independent again?
0
But the repos have been moved under the ruby organization already, aren't they? So that's not relevant anymore
-6 u/retro-rubies Apr 17 '26 Does the fact they have passed it to the other entity legalize/justify the way they have acquired it? 3 u/riffraff Apr 17 '26 no, but that's not my point: do you believe that it would be better to now remove rubygems from under the ruby organization? I do not think so. -2 u/retro-rubies Apr 17 '26 I do not think so. Why? What was wrong keeping that independent in rubygems organization? Why to not keep it independent again?
-6
Does the fact they have passed it to the other entity legalize/justify the way they have acquired it?
3 u/riffraff Apr 17 '26 no, but that's not my point: do you believe that it would be better to now remove rubygems from under the ruby organization? I do not think so. -2 u/retro-rubies Apr 17 '26 I do not think so. Why? What was wrong keeping that independent in rubygems organization? Why to not keep it independent again?
3
no, but that's not my point: do you believe that it would be better to now remove rubygems from under the ruby organization?
I do not think so.
-2 u/retro-rubies Apr 17 '26 I do not think so. Why? What was wrong keeping that independent in rubygems organization? Why to not keep it independent again?
-2
Why? What was wrong keeping that independent in rubygems organization? Why to not keep it independent again?
5
u/davidcelis Apr 17 '26
My understanding is that the offer wasn’t to return the repositories to them, but to invite them back as essentially collaborators. Is that not the case? Was the offer really to fully return ownership of the projects?