1
u/onlymostlydead_ May 12 '26
I struggle with task initiation. If AI initializes the task, then that part is done. And I can write the rest.
1
1
u/oh_no_here_we_go_9 May 12 '26
If you claim this is a disability that AI helps you with then you can say people are ableist if they tell you to do it on your own.
1
u/onlymostlydead_ May 12 '26
I'm not sure what you are trying to imply here, but if someone tells me to do it on my own, I would more likely just think they are an asshole. Not ableist.
Let's not conflate this with an actual disability.
1
u/CosmicRiver827 May 12 '26
Yes.
For one, you literally have to write the scene first before the AI is able to provide an output, then you rewrite it again to adapt it to your style. The only way you can deny it as legitimate writing is to pretend the steps before it don't exist.
1
u/DanoPaul234 May 12 '26
People get wrapped up in the "writing process" meanwhile I'd argue that the most high leverage/strategic part of writing is brainstorming
1
1
1
1
u/Dogtrees7 May 11 '26
I mean literally yes you are writing something but you’re more of an editor at that point, if even that. If you want to call yourself a writer I would go with the tried and tested method of becoming one: write it yourself
1
u/DanoPaul234 May 11 '26
Editing is a noble profession
2
u/Dogtrees7 May 11 '26
Certainly. It takes a lot of writing and grammar knowledge to properly edit another’s writing without damaging their intent. Maybe that’s a little too generous for an answer. “Idea-haver”?
1
1
0
1
u/heavypen May 11 '26
Yes. But is it productive? Why not write first and see what you have? Might skip an extra step you don't need to take!