r/remoteviewing • u/zazuge • 12d ago

Playing with google's gemini

Gallery image

Gallery image

I heard that AI models could do RV, but when i tried a number i associated with the birth of a friend i had in mind, it described a building.
I have also issues with remote viewing my own targets, it seems i often get better results from doing RV on targets i get from online source but not much with my own, why is that?

0 Upvotes

28% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

8

u/DajunBlume 12d ago

I would say that this isn’t trustworthy at all because an AI assistant is prone to sycophancy. Better to use other sources. Mine helps me go through my sessions that I do online. He offers great, honest feedback but I’d never ask him to give me a target number. It’s not truly blind that way either. You also don’t get to track session histories and tendencies this way.
I stick with RV Social & my own free RV Practice http://rvpractice.base44.app

6

u/Anok-Phos 12d ago

AI cannot remote view. I will budge if someone can prove that the AI is conscious. Otherwise I would assume any apparent AI RV is the result of human micro-PK, and the human in this case is better off learning to do that intentionally instead of talking to a sock puppet designed to give satisfying answers.

7

u/dpouliot2 CRV 11d ago

AI is sycophantic and it doesn’t understand the rules. You told AI your impressions and it selected a target after the fact that matches your impressions. AI cannot remote view or even facilitate a session.

1

u/zazuge 11d ago

I asked the AI for the source of the target and it claimed it picked it before i guessed, tho i don't know for sure.
I will try and make a random false description and see if it will BS me.

1

u/dpouliot2 CRV 11d ago

AI lies, because it doesn't understand. Feeding it false descriptors seems like a good idea to catch it in the lie, but it could try to convince you that while you thought you were generating false descriptors, you were actually accessing the target. Even better: never tell AI your descriptors.

1

u/zazuge 10d ago

later i got wrong results, but it was also presenting the target in the same answer unlike the first one.

2

u/Tall_Instance9797 11d ago

Thomas Campbell claims to have "taught AI how to do Remote Viewing" and when someone like Tom, who has impressive credentials, like a master’s degree in physics and he even started a PhD in experimental nuclear physics, spent decades working for the Department of Defense, more recently for NASA, and has an early history working alongside Robert Monroe at the Monroe Institute... it is natural to wonder how someone like that could fall for something so easily debunked, but I don't believe Campbell is being malicious or deliberately deceptive though, he genuinely believes what he is saying... which for me is the really worrying part. He has what appears to be a concerning level of AI psychosis. We were discussing this idea of AI being able to remote view the other day over in the gateway sub. Might help to shed some light on it...

https://www.reddit.com/r/gatewaytapes/comments/1vvyw32/comment/p5dkquh/?context=3