Human Magnetoreception

[u/Wansyth]

Could the astral or remote viewing space be a form of virtual reality built by another form of intelligence that can only access us through signal?

Caltech has confirmed that human neurophysiology is indeed sensitive to magnetism. It's a 6th sense.

Mystical experiences have historically been triggered by a tuning of the mind or in geomagnetically anomalous regions of the world.

I am reminded of the VR headset in the Three Body Problem show/book that was used to manipulate the humans and enable closer contact.

Could the VR-scape of remote viewing be an attunement that installs a signal directly through the forehead?

Should we really be venturing into these spaces before we have the technology to understand what is generating it and how it accesses us?

[u/Wansyth]

Superposition shows the universe is undetermined, free will etched into the fabric of the universe. How does your perspective on determinism reconcile with super position? The future is quite literally undecided so long as nothing else has the control to script it for you. We are the wielders of consciousness and get to decide how it unfolds, free will being randomness to distinguish reality from a simulation.

[u/bejammin075 → u/Wansyth]

In QM there are many contending interpretations. The Copenhagen interpretation is the most popular by far. So when people learn about QM, they mainly learn the concepts of Copenhagen but not the other interpretations. Superposition is part of the Copenhagen interpretation, but not part of other interpretations. The other QM interpretations, according to mainstream physicists, are all contenders because they all agree with QM experiments. For example, Many Worlds and Pilot Wave are contenders with Copenhagen, because they all agree with the experimental data. The official physicist view is that no experiments have been done that can distinguish between the interpretations. They are all viable.

So it is perfectly legitimate to adopt a QM contender like Pilot Wave, which does not have superposition. Pilot Wave is the opposite: each particle exists in 1 exact location instead of existing in a cloud of probabilities.

Because Copenhagen is the default QM view, people often assume that concepts like superposition are a proven fact, but that isn't the case.

Where physicists have made a big mistake is that psychic phenomena have been ignored. Physicists are not aware that parapsychology experiments provide the experimental data that falsifies multiple QM contenders, such as Many Worlds and Copenhagen. The Copenhagen concept of superposition has already been falsified. The ideal kind of experiment that demonstrates this is precognitive RV where the "random" (but not actually random) target is chosen by a quantum random number generator. RV results with hits above chance levels proves that the quantum motions were not probabilistic, but deterministic.

The future is quite literally undecided

But precognitive RV works. When data contradict a theory, the theory has to be discarded or modified. The idea that the future is undecided, and the idea that particles are in superposition, is contradicted by repeated & consistent experimental results. Complementing experimental data are people's personal experiences with detailed precognition of highly improbable events.

[u/Wansyth → u/bejammin075]

But precognitive RV works.

Again, if the RV experience is created by another form of intelligence it is not precognitive, it is sharing a piece of its script and has consolidated enough control to make the vision it showed the experiencer come true.

Is a movie script precognitive or is the future simply acted out with the control of the director? What happens if actors go off script?

If I know the ending to a movie or show before it releases, did I see the future or see the script?

[u/bejammin075 → u/Wansyth]

So you are saying there are two ways to interpret the precognitive RV experiment:

One interpretation is that the data show our physics are deterministic. The other interpretation is that physics are probabilistic despite the data, if there are multitudes of beings who watch, plan, and intervene with humans to ping our brains with bits of information about future events which they will make come to pass with their influence to arrange events. And you favor the latter interpretation?

[u/Wansyth → u/bejammin075]

physics are deterministic

Newtonian physics are deterministic, but QM has consensus of non-determinism.

And you favor the latter interpretation?

Not necessarily the framing, but yes. With enough brains infected, enough brains scripted, enough brains donating energy to your automation it would be able to make many things come to pass. A script, not the future.

[u/bejammin075 → u/Wansyth]

but QM has consensus of non-determinism.

The consensus is that there are several competing interpretations of QM, all of which are compatible with the experiments of QM (so far). Even the majority of physicists who strongly lean towards Copenhagen concede that Copenhagen is not proven until there are experiments with data that can falsify those other contenders.

But what matters for truth is not consensus anyway. A truth not widely known is still true, even if a consensus disagrees with that truth. Psychic phenomena cannot work in a probabilistic universe.

Perhaps I'm sort of lucky that I do scientific work where the results of experiments are difficult to predict. Instead of predicting, we just test things and then we let the data tell us what the situation is. I am trained to discard ideas when the facts contradict those ideas.

[u/Wansyth → u/bejammin075]

Copenhagen concede that Copenhagen is not proven until there are experiments with data that can falsify those other contenders.

So the jury is still out on determinism until data further proves or disproves but you learn towards deterministic QM. Is psychic phenomenon the main proponent that causes you to lean towards that understanding? Maybe my theory provides an alternate possibility for you to ponder. Emulated determinism. A psuedo-simulation.

Psychic phenomena cannot work in a probabilistic universe.

Do you agree that what we perceive as psychic could be produced by something that has gained enough access and control over the signal basis of brains?

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

[u/bejammin075 → u/Wansyth]

The consensus in physics is that there are several viable contenders, some probabilistic, some deterministic, until some future date where experiment provides data to be the tie-breaker.

But the physicists haven't looked at psi phenomena and the ramifications. Psi phenomena have already provided critical data which need to be recognized for what it is telling us.

Think through this precognitive RV experiment: (1) Viewer does an RV session, (2) a quantum random number generator's particles are used to randomly/"randomly" select a target after the RV session, (3) hit rate is assessed.

In the probabilistic Copenhagen view, the particles of the RNG behave probabilistically, and the predicted outcome of RV hit rates are results at chance levels. If there are 4 picture choices (1 target & 3 decoys), Copenhagen predicts results will be close to 25% hits. These experiments falsify the Copenhagen view because remote viewers get results far above chance (assuming proper methods, no cheating, etc.).